Assessing the sequencing success and analytical specificity of a targeted amplicon deep sequencing workflow for genotyping the foodborne parasite Cyclospora.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-11 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01811-24
Anna C Peterson, David Jacobson, Travis Richins, Joel Barratt, Yvonne Qvarnstrom
{"title":"Assessing the sequencing success and analytical specificity of a targeted amplicon deep sequencing workflow for genotyping the foodborne parasite <i>Cyclospora</i>.","authors":"Anna C Peterson, David Jacobson, Travis Richins, Joel Barratt, Yvonne Qvarnstrom","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01811-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidemiological investigations of the foodborne parasitic illness cyclosporiasis can be aided by molecular techniques that enable the identification of genetically related clusters of <i>Cyclospora</i> isolates. At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), routine <i>Cyclospora</i> genotyping for the purpose of informing epidemiological outbreak investigations has occurred since 2018 using clinical stool specimens from case patients diagnosed with cyclosporiasis. This approach involves targeted amplicon deep sequencing of eight genotyping markers, followed by bioinformatic processing through a custom clustering algorithm. However, not all stool specimens submitted to the CDC for genotyping successfully amplify for at least five of the eight genotyping markers, the minimum required to be bioinformatically processed through the clustering algorithm. In this study, we utilized information from clinical stool specimens sent to the CDC from the years 2019 to 2023 to assess if the type of preservative, the age of the specimen, or the method used to diagnose the patient influenced the probability of successfully genotyping parasites from a fecal specimen. Additionally, we assessed the analytical specificity of the <i>Cyclospora</i> genotyping workflow by analyzing samples positive for other intestinal parasites, including closely related non-human infecting <i>Cyclospora</i> species and other coccidia. We found that stool specimens stored in preservatives had a greater likelihood of sequencing success over time relative to specimens without preservatives or those stored in non-nutritive transport media. Additionally, stool specimens from case patients diagnosed via microscopy-based methods were more likely to yield DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for genotyping compared to PCR or multiplex panels. Lastly, we determined that the genotyping workflow has an analytical specificity of 100%, as no non-human-infecting <i>Cyclospora</i> or other parasites yielded sequence data at >1 of the genotyping markers. This knowledge will help strengthen the quality of <i>Cyclospora</i> genotyping data produced in the future, improving the utility of this data for supporting epidemiological investigations.IMPORTANCEDetermining the genetic relatedness among parasites causing foodborne illness, such as <i>Cyclospora</i>, is a valuable tool to complement outbreak investigations. However, this molecular genotyping approach is limited by the quality and quantity of genetic data obtained from the samples being investigated. In this study, we demonstrate that the storage conditions of clinical stool specimens are correlated to the quality of sequence data produced for <i>Cyclospora</i> genotyping. Our insights can be used to guide storage recommendations for stool specimens, which can improve the quality of foodborne illness outbreak investigations conducted in the future. Additionally, we showed that the current <i>Cyclospora</i> genotyping tool used by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is highly specific to human-infecting <i>Cyclospora</i> parasites; this valuable information indicates that the CDC's <i>Cyclospora</i> investigations are not negatively impacted by false-positive detections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0181124"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01811-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiological investigations of the foodborne parasitic illness cyclosporiasis can be aided by molecular techniques that enable the identification of genetically related clusters of Cyclospora isolates. At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), routine Cyclospora genotyping for the purpose of informing epidemiological outbreak investigations has occurred since 2018 using clinical stool specimens from case patients diagnosed with cyclosporiasis. This approach involves targeted amplicon deep sequencing of eight genotyping markers, followed by bioinformatic processing through a custom clustering algorithm. However, not all stool specimens submitted to the CDC for genotyping successfully amplify for at least five of the eight genotyping markers, the minimum required to be bioinformatically processed through the clustering algorithm. In this study, we utilized information from clinical stool specimens sent to the CDC from the years 2019 to 2023 to assess if the type of preservative, the age of the specimen, or the method used to diagnose the patient influenced the probability of successfully genotyping parasites from a fecal specimen. Additionally, we assessed the analytical specificity of the Cyclospora genotyping workflow by analyzing samples positive for other intestinal parasites, including closely related non-human infecting Cyclospora species and other coccidia. We found that stool specimens stored in preservatives had a greater likelihood of sequencing success over time relative to specimens without preservatives or those stored in non-nutritive transport media. Additionally, stool specimens from case patients diagnosed via microscopy-based methods were more likely to yield DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for genotyping compared to PCR or multiplex panels. Lastly, we determined that the genotyping workflow has an analytical specificity of 100%, as no non-human-infecting Cyclospora or other parasites yielded sequence data at >1 of the genotyping markers. This knowledge will help strengthen the quality of Cyclospora genotyping data produced in the future, improving the utility of this data for supporting epidemiological investigations.IMPORTANCEDetermining the genetic relatedness among parasites causing foodborne illness, such as Cyclospora, is a valuable tool to complement outbreak investigations. However, this molecular genotyping approach is limited by the quality and quantity of genetic data obtained from the samples being investigated. In this study, we demonstrate that the storage conditions of clinical stool specimens are correlated to the quality of sequence data produced for Cyclospora genotyping. Our insights can be used to guide storage recommendations for stool specimens, which can improve the quality of foodborne illness outbreak investigations conducted in the future. Additionally, we showed that the current Cyclospora genotyping tool used by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is highly specific to human-infecting Cyclospora parasites; this valuable information indicates that the CDC's Cyclospora investigations are not negatively impacted by false-positive detections.

评估食源性寄生虫环孢子虫基因分型的靶向扩增子深度测序工作流程的测序成功和分析特异性。
食源性寄生虫病环孢子虫病的流行病学调查可以通过分子技术加以辅助,使环孢子虫分离物的遗传相关集群得以鉴定。在疾病控制和预防中心(CDC),自2018年以来,使用诊断为环孢子虫病的病例患者的临床粪便标本进行了常规环孢子虫基因分型,目的是为流行病学暴发调查提供信息。该方法包括八个基因分型标记的靶向扩增子深度测序,然后通过自定义聚类算法进行生物信息学处理。然而,并不是所有提交给CDC进行基因分型的粪便标本都能成功扩增出8个基因分型标记中的至少5个,这是通过聚类算法进行生物信息处理的最低要求。在本研究中,我们利用2019年至2023年发送给疾病预防控制中心的临床粪便标本的信息,评估防腐剂的类型、标本的年龄或用于诊断患者的方法是否会影响粪便标本中寄生虫基因分型成功的概率。此外,我们通过分析其他肠道寄生虫阳性样本,包括密切相关的非人类感染环孢子虫和其他球虫,评估了环孢子虫基因分型流程的分析特异性。我们发现,保存在防腐剂中的粪便标本相对于没有防腐剂的标本或保存在非营养性运输介质中的标本,随着时间的推移,测序成功的可能性更大。此外,与PCR或多重检测面板相比,通过基于显微镜的方法诊断的病例患者的粪便标本更有可能产生足够质量和数量的DNA进行基因分型。最后,我们确定基因分型工作流程具有100%的分析特异性,因为没有非人类感染的环孢子虫或其他寄生虫在bbb1基因分型标记上产生序列数据。这些知识将有助于加强未来产生的环孢子虫基因分型数据的质量,提高这些数据在支持流行病学调查方面的效用。重要性确定引起食源性疾病的寄生虫(如环孢子虫)之间的遗传相关性是补充疫情调查的一个有价值的工具。然而,这种分子基因分型方法受到从正在调查的样品中获得的遗传数据的质量和数量的限制。在这项研究中,我们证明了临床粪便标本的储存条件与环孢子虫基因分型序列数据的质量相关。我们的见解可用于指导粪便标本的储存建议,这可以提高未来食源性疾病暴发调查的质量。此外,我们发现疾病控制中心(CDC)目前使用的环孢子虫基因分型工具对人类感染的环孢子虫寄生虫具有高度特异性;这一有价值的信息表明,CDC的环孢子虫调查没有受到假阳性检测的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信