Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Wen-Feng Du, Tang-Shuai Liang, Zong-Fei Guo, Jian-Jun Li, Cheng-Gang Yang
{"title":"Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.","authors":"Wen-Feng Du, Tang-Shuai Liang, Zong-Fei Guo, Jian-Jun Li, Cheng-Gang Yang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.100476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colon cancer is a significant health issue in China, with high incidence and mortality rates. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment, with the introduction of complete mesocolic excision in 2009 improving precision and outcomes. Laparoscopic techniques, including laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy (LARH) and total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (TLRH), have further advanced colon cancer treatment by reducing trauma, blood loss, and recovery time. While TLRH offers additional benefits such as faster recovery and fewer complications, its adoption has been limited by longer operative times and technical challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the short-term outcomes of TLRH and LARH for the treatment of right -sided colon cancer and explore the advantages and feasibility of TLRH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 109 right-sided colon cancer patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into an observation group (TLRH, <i>n</i> = 50) and a control group (LARH, <i>n</i> = 59). Study variables were operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stays, length of surgical specimen, number of lymph nodes dissected, and postoperative inflammatory factor levels of the two groups of patients. The postoperative complications were analyzed and compared, and survival, recurrence, and remote metastasis rates of the two groups were compared during a 2-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TLRH group showed the advantages of reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery. Lymph node dissection outcomes were comparable, and postoperative inflammatory markers were lower in the TLRH group. Complication rates were similar. Short-term follow-up (2 years) revealed no significant differences in recurrence, metastasis, or survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to LARH, TLRH offers significant advantages in terms of reducing surgical trauma, lowering postoperative inflammatory factor levels, and mitigating the impact on intestinal function. This approach contributes to a shorter hospital stay and promotes postoperative recovery in patients. The study suggests that TLRH may offer favorable outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"100476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.100476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colon cancer is a significant health issue in China, with high incidence and mortality rates. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment, with the introduction of complete mesocolic excision in 2009 improving precision and outcomes. Laparoscopic techniques, including laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy (LARH) and total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (TLRH), have further advanced colon cancer treatment by reducing trauma, blood loss, and recovery time. While TLRH offers additional benefits such as faster recovery and fewer complications, its adoption has been limited by longer operative times and technical challenges.

Aim: To compare the short-term outcomes of TLRH and LARH for the treatment of right -sided colon cancer and explore the advantages and feasibility of TLRH.

Methods: Clinical data from 109 right-sided colon cancer patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into an observation group (TLRH, n = 50) and a control group (LARH, n = 59). Study variables were operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stays, length of surgical specimen, number of lymph nodes dissected, and postoperative inflammatory factor levels of the two groups of patients. The postoperative complications were analyzed and compared, and survival, recurrence, and remote metastasis rates of the two groups were compared during a 2-year follow-up period.

Results: The TLRH group showed the advantages of reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery. Lymph node dissection outcomes were comparable, and postoperative inflammatory markers were lower in the TLRH group. Complication rates were similar. Short-term follow-up (2 years) revealed no significant differences in recurrence, metastasis, or survival rates.

Conclusion: Compared to LARH, TLRH offers significant advantages in terms of reducing surgical trauma, lowering postoperative inflammatory factor levels, and mitigating the impact on intestinal function. This approach contributes to a shorter hospital stay and promotes postoperative recovery in patients. The study suggests that TLRH may offer favorable outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

腹腔镜辅助与全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的疗效比较。
背景:在中国,结肠癌是一个重要的健康问题,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。手术切除仍然是主要的治疗方法,2009年引入的全肠系膜切除术提高了准确性和预后。腹腔镜技术,包括腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术(LARH)和全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(TLRH),通过减少创伤、失血和恢复时间,进一步推进了结肠癌的治疗。虽然TLRH具有更快的恢复速度和更少的并发症等其他优点,但其采用受到手术时间长和技术挑战的限制。目的:比较TLRH与LARH治疗右侧结肠癌的近期疗效,探讨TLRH的优势和可行性。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年5月收治的109例右侧结肠癌患者的临床资料。患者分为观察组(TLRH, n = 50)和对照组(LARH, n = 59)。研究变量为两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、手术标本长度、淋巴结清扫数、术后炎症因子水平。分析比较两组患者术后并发症,并在2年随访期间比较两组患者的生存率、复发率和远处转移率。结果:TLRH组术中出血少,住院时间短,恢复快。淋巴结清扫结果具有可比性,TLRH组术后炎症标志物较低。并发症发生率相似。短期随访(2年)显示复发、转移或生存率无显著差异。结论:与LARH相比,TLRH在减少手术创伤、降低术后炎症因子水平、减轻肠道功能影响等方面具有显著优势。这种方法有助于缩短住院时间,促进患者术后恢复。该研究表明,TLRH可能为结直肠癌患者提供有利的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信