Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) With IOTA Simple Rules and ADNEX Model for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Head-To-Head Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) With IOTA Simple Rules and ADNEX Model for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Head-To-Head Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gisela Almeida, Mar Bort, Juan Luis Alcázar","doi":"10.1002/jcu.24048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of O-RADS (Ovarian Reporting and Data System) and IOTA (international Ovarian Tumor Analysis group) simple rules (SR) and ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) model for discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of studies comparing O-RADS with SR and/or ADNEX in the same set of patients with an adnexal mass was performed in Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 2020 to September 2023. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles comprising 3924 women (3979 adnexal masses) were ultimately included after exclusions. Three studies compared O-RADS versus SR, three studies compared O-RADS versus ADNEX, and three studies compared all three methods. The risk of bias was high for patient selection in QUADAS-2 in all studies. Six studies compared O-RADS versus SR; no significant differences were found (pooled sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS and IOTA SR were 94.0% and 77.0%, and 91.0% and 87.0%, respectively. p = 0.2204). Six studies compared O-RADS versus ADNEX; no significant differences were found (pooled sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS classification system and ADNEX were 95.0% and 79.0%, and 91.0% and 88.0%, respectively. p = 0.2307).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>O-RADS classification has a similar diagnostic performance to IOTA SR and ADNEX for discriminating benign and malignant adnexal masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of O-RADS (Ovarian Reporting and Data System) and IOTA (international Ovarian Tumor Analysis group) simple rules (SR) and ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) model for discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses using meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic search of studies comparing O-RADS with SR and/or ADNEX in the same set of patients with an adnexal mass was performed in Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 2020 to September 2023. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed.
Results: Nine articles comprising 3924 women (3979 adnexal masses) were ultimately included after exclusions. Three studies compared O-RADS versus SR, three studies compared O-RADS versus ADNEX, and three studies compared all three methods. The risk of bias was high for patient selection in QUADAS-2 in all studies. Six studies compared O-RADS versus SR; no significant differences were found (pooled sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS and IOTA SR were 94.0% and 77.0%, and 91.0% and 87.0%, respectively. p = 0.2204). Six studies compared O-RADS versus ADNEX; no significant differences were found (pooled sensitivity and specificity of O-RADS classification system and ADNEX were 95.0% and 79.0%, and 91.0% and 88.0%, respectively. p = 0.2307).
Conclusion: O-RADS classification has a similar diagnostic performance to IOTA SR and ADNEX for discriminating benign and malignant adnexal masses.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
