Clinical and subclinical mastitis incidence in pasture-based dairy cows.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
S McDougall, J Williamson, J Lacy-Hulbert, N Steele, C Eastwood
{"title":"Clinical and subclinical mastitis incidence in pasture-based dairy cows.","authors":"S McDougall, J Williamson, J Lacy-Hulbert, N Steele, C Eastwood","doi":"10.1080/00480169.2025.2487672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate prevalence and incidence of intramammary infections (IMI) using herd test somatic cell counts (SCC) or quarter-level microbiology in a single pasture-based, seasonal calving dairy herd.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over four seasons (2010/11-2013/14) milk samples were collected for microbiology from quarters of all cows at four times; calving, MID1 (mean 116 (SD 21) days in milk (DIM)), MID2 (mean 204 (SD 21) DIM), and at drying off (DO; mean 266 (SD 30) DIM). SCC was determined every 1-4 (median = 2) weeks. Quarters were defined as having a new IMI if a bacterium was isolated that was not present at the preceding milk sampling and a cow was defined as having a new IMI where one or more quarters had a new IMI. Cows were defined as having a new high SCC where SCC increased to ≥ 200,000 cells/mL. Binary logistic regression and Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence and incidence rate (IR) of new infections. Cow-level IR estimates from bacteriology and SCC were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> analyses, and the sensitivity and specificity were estimated for SCC to estimate IR, assuming bacteriology was the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of cows with a high SCC was 12.7 (95% CI = 12.3-13.1)% and quarter-level prevalence of IMI was 10.7 (95% CI = 10.2-11.1)%. The unadjusted IR for a new cow-level high SCC was 2.2 (95% CI = 2.0-2.4)/1,000 cow-days and for a new quarter-level IMI was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71-0.95)/1,000 quarter-days at risk. Prevalence and IR were associated with DIM (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), and season (p < 0.001). The agreement between the IR based on herd test SCC and microbiology at cow-level was 77.1% (p < 0.001), with the level of agreement highest in mid-lactation. The sensitivity and specificity of an increase in SCC were 29.8% and 88.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prevalence and IR varied by season, age and DIM. While the IR estimates differed between estimates based on a high SCC at the cow-level, and quarter-level microbiology, the level of agreement was 77% suggesting utility of cow-composite SCC data as a mastitis monitoring tool. However, the sensitivity of incidence based on elevated SCC was only approximately 30% relative to quarter-level microbiology as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides the first estimates of prevalence and incidence of IMI in pasture-based dairy cows.<b>Abbreviations:</b> DIM: Days in milk; DO: Dry Off; EMM: Estimated marginal mean; IMI: Intramammary infection; IR: Incidence rate; NAS: Non-aureus staphylococci; SCC: Somatic cell count; TAR: Time at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19322,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand veterinary journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2025.2487672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To estimate prevalence and incidence of intramammary infections (IMI) using herd test somatic cell counts (SCC) or quarter-level microbiology in a single pasture-based, seasonal calving dairy herd.

Methods: Over four seasons (2010/11-2013/14) milk samples were collected for microbiology from quarters of all cows at four times; calving, MID1 (mean 116 (SD 21) days in milk (DIM)), MID2 (mean 204 (SD 21) DIM), and at drying off (DO; mean 266 (SD 30) DIM). SCC was determined every 1-4 (median = 2) weeks. Quarters were defined as having a new IMI if a bacterium was isolated that was not present at the preceding milk sampling and a cow was defined as having a new IMI where one or more quarters had a new IMI. Cows were defined as having a new high SCC where SCC increased to ≥ 200,000 cells/mL. Binary logistic regression and Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence and incidence rate (IR) of new infections. Cow-level IR estimates from bacteriology and SCC were compared using χ2 analyses, and the sensitivity and specificity were estimated for SCC to estimate IR, assuming bacteriology was the gold standard.

Results: The prevalence of cows with a high SCC was 12.7 (95% CI = 12.3-13.1)% and quarter-level prevalence of IMI was 10.7 (95% CI = 10.2-11.1)%. The unadjusted IR for a new cow-level high SCC was 2.2 (95% CI = 2.0-2.4)/1,000 cow-days and for a new quarter-level IMI was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71-0.95)/1,000 quarter-days at risk. Prevalence and IR were associated with DIM (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), and season (p < 0.001). The agreement between the IR based on herd test SCC and microbiology at cow-level was 77.1% (p < 0.001), with the level of agreement highest in mid-lactation. The sensitivity and specificity of an increase in SCC were 29.8% and 88.9%, respectively.

Conclusions: Prevalence and IR varied by season, age and DIM. While the IR estimates differed between estimates based on a high SCC at the cow-level, and quarter-level microbiology, the level of agreement was 77% suggesting utility of cow-composite SCC data as a mastitis monitoring tool. However, the sensitivity of incidence based on elevated SCC was only approximately 30% relative to quarter-level microbiology as the gold standard.

Clinical relevance: This study provides the first estimates of prevalence and incidence of IMI in pasture-based dairy cows.Abbreviations: DIM: Days in milk; DO: Dry Off; EMM: Estimated marginal mean; IMI: Intramammary infection; IR: Incidence rate; NAS: Non-aureus staphylococci; SCC: Somatic cell count; TAR: Time at risk.

放牧奶牛的临床和亚临床乳腺炎发病率。
目的:利用群体试验体细胞计数(SCC)或四分之一水平微生物学在单一牧场季节性产犊奶牛群体中估计乳腺内感染(IMI)的患病率和发病率。方法:在4个季节(2010/11-2013/14)中,4次在所有奶牛的舍内采集乳样进行微生物学检测;产犊、MID1(平均116天(SD 21))、MID2(平均204天(SD 21))和干燥(DO;平均266 (SD 30) DIM)。每1-4周(中位数= 2周)检测一次SCC。如果在之前的牛奶取样中分离出一种细菌,则将其定义为有新的IMI;如果一个或多个季度有新的IMI,则将奶牛定义为有新的IMI。当SCC增加到≥200,000细胞/mL时,定义为具有新的高SCC。采用二元logistic回归和泊松模型估计新发感染的患病率和发病率(IR)。采用χ2分析比较细菌学和SCC的牛水平IR估计值,并假设细菌学是金标准,估计SCC估计IR的敏感性和特异性。结果:高SCC奶牛的患病率为12.7% (95% CI = 12.3-13.1)%, IMI的四分之一水平患病率为10.7 (95% CI = 10.2-11.1)%。新牛水平高SCC的未调整IR为2.2 (95% CI = 2.0-2.4)/1,000牛天,新1 / 4水平IMI的未调整IR为0.82 (95% CI = 0.71-0.95)/1,000牛天。结论:流行率和IR随季节、年龄和DIM而变化。虽然IR估计在基于奶牛水平的高SCC和四分之一水平微生物学的估计之间存在差异,但一致性水平为77%,表明奶牛复合SCC数据可作为乳腺炎监测工具。然而,与四分之一水平微生物学作为金标准相比,基于SCC升高的发生率敏感性仅为约30%。临床相关性:本研究首次估计了牧场奶牛中IMI的患病率和发病率。DIM:牛奶中的天数;正确做法:擦干;EMM:估计边际平均值;IMI:乳腺内感染;IR:发病率;NAS:非金黄色葡萄球菌;SCC:体细胞计数;TAR:有时间风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Zealand veterinary journal
New Zealand veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Veterinary Journal (NZVJ) is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed articles covering all aspects of veterinary science, including clinical practice, animal welfare and animal health. The NZVJ publishes original research findings, clinical communications (including novel case reports and case series), rapid communications, correspondence and review articles, originating from New Zealand and internationally. Topics should be relevant to, but not limited to, New Zealand veterinary and animal science communities, and include the disciplines of infectious disease, medicine, surgery and the health, management and welfare of production and companion animals, horses and New Zealand wildlife. All submissions are expected to meet the highest ethical and welfare standards, as detailed in the Journal’s instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信