A qualitative study of abortion decision-making trajectories among pregnant women at their first antenatal care visit in Kampala, Uganda.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Blake Erhardt-Ohren, Alison M El Ayadi, Hadija Nalubwama, Carol S Camlin, Dilys Walker, Josaphat Byamugisha, Alexander C Tsai, Umar Senoga, Paul J Krezanoski, Cynthia C Harper, Alison B Comfort
{"title":"A qualitative study of abortion decision-making trajectories among pregnant women at their first antenatal care visit in Kampala, Uganda.","authors":"Blake Erhardt-Ohren, Alison M El Ayadi, Hadija Nalubwama, Carol S Camlin, Dilys Walker, Josaphat Byamugisha, Alexander C Tsai, Umar Senoga, Paul J Krezanoski, Cynthia C Harper, Alison B Comfort","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Uganda, only about half of women who want to avoid pregnancy are using modern contraceptives, leading to high numbers of unintended pregnancies and elevated maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to learn more about women's abortion decision-making before continuing to carry a pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilised a qualitative study design and interviewed 31 purposively selected single and partnered pregnant women aged ≥18 years at their first antenatal care visit at Kawempe National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted the interviews in Luganda or English, transcribed them, and then translated them into English, as needed, for analysis. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. Deductive codes were based on social networks, social support, and health behaviour theories, and inductive codes were derived from interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the study participants (n = 13) considered an induced abortion before deciding to continue carrying their pregnancy. The most commonly stated reasons they considered abortion included anticipated interruptions to work and education, exhaustion related to child-rearing, and lack of social support. Other participants (n = 9) reported not considering abortion due to anticipated social support for their pregnancy, concerns about abortion-related morbidity and mortality, late confirmation of pregnancy, and religious beliefs. No participants discussed Uganda's restrictive abortion policies as a reason not to consider abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results point to opportunities for continued reproductive health education and improved access to reproductive health services to allow pregnant women to meet their reproductive needs, seek out family planning, antenatal care, and safe abortion services when desired, and create support networks for pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Uganda, only about half of women who want to avoid pregnancy are using modern contraceptives, leading to high numbers of unintended pregnancies and elevated maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to learn more about women's abortion decision-making before continuing to carry a pregnancy.

Methods: We utilised a qualitative study design and interviewed 31 purposively selected single and partnered pregnant women aged ≥18 years at their first antenatal care visit at Kawempe National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted the interviews in Luganda or English, transcribed them, and then translated them into English, as needed, for analysis. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. Deductive codes were based on social networks, social support, and health behaviour theories, and inductive codes were derived from interview transcripts.

Results: Almost half of the study participants (n = 13) considered an induced abortion before deciding to continue carrying their pregnancy. The most commonly stated reasons they considered abortion included anticipated interruptions to work and education, exhaustion related to child-rearing, and lack of social support. Other participants (n = 9) reported not considering abortion due to anticipated social support for their pregnancy, concerns about abortion-related morbidity and mortality, late confirmation of pregnancy, and religious beliefs. No participants discussed Uganda's restrictive abortion policies as a reason not to consider abortion.

Conclusions: Our results point to opportunities for continued reproductive health education and improved access to reproductive health services to allow pregnant women to meet their reproductive needs, seek out family planning, antenatal care, and safe abortion services when desired, and create support networks for pregnant women.

在坎帕拉,乌干达的孕妇在他们的第一次产前保健访问堕胎决策轨迹的定性研究。
背景:在乌干达,只有大约一半希望避免怀孕的妇女使用现代避孕药具,导致大量意外怀孕,孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率升高。在这项研究中,我们旨在了解更多关于妇女在继续怀孕前的堕胎决策。方法:我们采用定性研究设计,在乌干达坎帕拉的Kawempe国家转诊医院首次进行产前检查时,有意选择31名年龄≥18岁的单身和伴侣孕妇进行访谈。我们用卢甘达语或英语进行采访,将其转录,然后根据需要将其翻译成英语,以供分析。我们使用主题分析来分析数据。演绎代码基于社会网络、社会支持和健康行为理论,归纳代码来源于访谈记录。结果:几乎一半的研究参与者(n = 13)在决定继续怀孕之前考虑过人工流产。他们考虑堕胎的最常见原因包括预期的工作和教育中断、抚养孩子的疲惫以及缺乏社会支持。其他参与者(n = 9)报告说,由于预期社会对其怀孕的支持、对堕胎相关发病率和死亡率的担忧、怀孕确认较晚以及宗教信仰,他们没有考虑堕胎。没有与会者讨论乌干达的限制性堕胎政策是不考虑堕胎的理由。结论:我们的研究结果表明,有机会继续进行生殖健康教育,改善获得生殖健康服务的机会,使孕妇能够满足其生殖需求,在需要时寻求计划生育、产前护理和安全堕胎服务,并为孕妇建立支持网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信