Attitudes of undergraduate medical students towards end-of-life decisions: a systematic review of influencing factors.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julia S Grundnig, Marlen A Roehe, Carmen Trost, Anahit Anvari-Pirsch, Anita Holzinger
{"title":"Attitudes of undergraduate medical students towards end-of-life decisions: a systematic review of influencing factors.","authors":"Julia S Grundnig, Marlen A Roehe, Carmen Trost, Anahit Anvari-Pirsch, Anita Holzinger","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07077-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical end-of-life decisions, including voluntary active euthanasia (lethal injection), (physician-)assisted dying (prescribing lethal substances), passive euthanasia (refraining from or ceasing life-sustaining treatments), palliative sedation (administering sedatives to alleviate suffering, possibly leading to unintended life-shortening), and treatment withdrawal/withholding, have become prevalent in modern medical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aims to analyse international data on undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards (physician-) assisted dying, palliative sedation, treatment withdrawal/withholding, active and passive euthanasia. The objectives are to assess approval rates over the past 24 years and to identify factors influencing these attitudes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) was conducted. The review encompasses studies from 2000-2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria (43 surveys, 6 qualitative studies, 1 mixed-method study). The studies were globally distributed: Europe (27), Asia (10), America (8), Africa (3), and Australia (1). Predictors such as age, clinical vs. pre-clinical status, religious aspects, sex, and ethnicity were investigated. Age and gender had limited influence, whereas religion was a significant factor. Compared with pre-clinical students, clinical students showed more support for end-of-life practices. Geographic locations and socioeconomic status also affect attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical students' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions are influenced by clinical experience, religious beliefs, and geographic location. The acceptance rates for euthanasia and (physician-)assisted dying vary significantly across regions, reflecting diverse cultural and educational backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07077-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical end-of-life decisions, including voluntary active euthanasia (lethal injection), (physician-)assisted dying (prescribing lethal substances), passive euthanasia (refraining from or ceasing life-sustaining treatments), palliative sedation (administering sedatives to alleviate suffering, possibly leading to unintended life-shortening), and treatment withdrawal/withholding, have become prevalent in modern medical practice.

Aim: This systematic review aims to analyse international data on undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards (physician-) assisted dying, palliative sedation, treatment withdrawal/withholding, active and passive euthanasia. The objectives are to assess approval rates over the past 24 years and to identify factors influencing these attitudes.

Design: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) was conducted. The review encompasses studies from 2000-2024.

Results: Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria (43 surveys, 6 qualitative studies, 1 mixed-method study). The studies were globally distributed: Europe (27), Asia (10), America (8), Africa (3), and Australia (1). Predictors such as age, clinical vs. pre-clinical status, religious aspects, sex, and ethnicity were investigated. Age and gender had limited influence, whereas religion was a significant factor. Compared with pre-clinical students, clinical students showed more support for end-of-life practices. Geographic locations and socioeconomic status also affect attitudes.

Conclusion: Medical students' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions are influenced by clinical experience, religious beliefs, and geographic location. The acceptance rates for euthanasia and (physician-)assisted dying vary significantly across regions, reflecting diverse cultural and educational backgrounds.

医大学生对临终决定的态度:影响因素的系统回顾。
背景:医疗临终决定,包括自愿主动安乐死(致命注射)、(医生)协助死亡(处方致命物质)、被动安乐死(避免或停止维持生命的治疗)、缓和镇静(给予镇静剂以减轻痛苦,可能导致意外缩短生命)和治疗退出/停止,在现代医疗实践中已变得普遍。目的:本系统综述旨在分析国际上医科本科生对(医生)协助死亡、姑息性镇静、停/停治疗、主动和被动安乐死的态度。目的是评估过去24年的赞成率,并查明影响这些态度的因素。设计:按照PRISMA指南,系统检索6个电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、ERIC、PsycINFO和Web of Science)。该综述涵盖了2000年至2024年的研究。结果:49项研究符合纳入标准(43项调查,6项定性研究,1项混合方法研究)。这些研究分布于全球:欧洲(27)、亚洲(10)、美洲(8)、非洲(3)和澳大利亚(1)。预测因素,如年龄,临床与临床前状态,宗教方面,性别和种族进行了调查。年龄和性别的影响有限,而宗教是重要因素。与临床预科生相比,临床生对临终实践的支持程度更高。地理位置和社会经济地位也会影响态度。结论:医学生对临终决定的态度受临床经验、宗教信仰和地理位置的影响。安乐死和(医生)协助死亡的接受率在不同地区差异很大,反映了不同的文化和教育背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信