Understanding the gap: a balanced multi-perspective approach to defining essential digital health competencies for medical graduates.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brett Sumner, Rachelle Martin, Tehmina Gladman, Tim J Wilkinson, Rebecca Grainger
{"title":"Understanding the gap: a balanced multi-perspective approach to defining essential digital health competencies for medical graduates.","authors":"Brett Sumner, Rachelle Martin, Tehmina Gladman, Tim J Wilkinson, Rebecca Grainger","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07194-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid technological advancements have left medical graduates potentially underprepared for the digital healthcare environment. Despite the importance of digital health education, consensus on essential primary medical degree content is lacking. Focusing on core competence domains can address critical skills while minimising additions to an already demanding curriculum. This study identifies the minimum essential digital health competency domains from the perspectives of learners, teachers, and content experts aiming to provide a framework for integrating digital health education into medical curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted focus groups with students (n = 17), and semi-structured interviews with medical educators (n = 12) and digital sector experts (n = 11) using video conferencing. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. The data were analysed using framework analysis and inductive thematic analysis to identify common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four core themes and eleven sub-themes were identified and aggregated into four essential competency domains: \"Understand the Local Digital Health Ecosystem and Landscape\", \"Safe, Secure and Ethical Information Literacy and Management\", \"Proficiency in Digital Health Tools and Associated Technologies\" and \"Scholarly Research and Evidence-based Practice\". Medical educator and digital sector expert participants provided the greatest source of data for curriculum content consideration. Students demonstrated varying levels of aptitude, confidence, and interest in technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our balanced engagement with learners, educators, and digital health experts enabled the identification of a context-relevant framework for the minimum essential digital health competence domains for graduating medical students. The identification of focused, clinically relevant core competencies makes them amenable to integration into an existing curriculum tailored to local contexts. This approach addresses limitations of restricted curricular space and accommodates varying student interests, confidence and aptitude in technology. The delivery approach should consider a student-centred adaptive modality that takes advantage of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) as an effective pedagogical tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"682"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07194-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid technological advancements have left medical graduates potentially underprepared for the digital healthcare environment. Despite the importance of digital health education, consensus on essential primary medical degree content is lacking. Focusing on core competence domains can address critical skills while minimising additions to an already demanding curriculum. This study identifies the minimum essential digital health competency domains from the perspectives of learners, teachers, and content experts aiming to provide a framework for integrating digital health education into medical curricula.

Methods: We conducted focus groups with students (n = 17), and semi-structured interviews with medical educators (n = 12) and digital sector experts (n = 11) using video conferencing. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling. The data were analysed using framework analysis and inductive thematic analysis to identify common themes.

Results: Four core themes and eleven sub-themes were identified and aggregated into four essential competency domains: "Understand the Local Digital Health Ecosystem and Landscape", "Safe, Secure and Ethical Information Literacy and Management", "Proficiency in Digital Health Tools and Associated Technologies" and "Scholarly Research and Evidence-based Practice". Medical educator and digital sector expert participants provided the greatest source of data for curriculum content consideration. Students demonstrated varying levels of aptitude, confidence, and interest in technology.

Conclusion: Our balanced engagement with learners, educators, and digital health experts enabled the identification of a context-relevant framework for the minimum essential digital health competence domains for graduating medical students. The identification of focused, clinically relevant core competencies makes them amenable to integration into an existing curriculum tailored to local contexts. This approach addresses limitations of restricted curricular space and accommodates varying student interests, confidence and aptitude in technology. The delivery approach should consider a student-centred adaptive modality that takes advantage of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) as an effective pedagogical tool.

理解差距:一种平衡的多视角方法来定义医学毕业生的基本数字健康能力。
背景:快速的技术进步使医学毕业生可能对数字医疗环境准备不足。尽管数字健康教育很重要,但对基本医学学位内容缺乏共识。专注于核心能力领域可以解决关键技能,同时最大限度地减少对已经要求很高的课程的补充。本研究从学习者、教师和内容专家的角度确定了最低必要的数字健康能力领域,旨在为将数字健康教育整合到医学课程中提供一个框架。方法:我们对学生(n = 17)进行了焦点小组讨论,并利用视频会议对医学教育者(n = 12)和数字领域专家(n = 11)进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是通过有目的的抽样来招募的。采用框架分析法和归纳主题性分析法对数据进行分析,找出共同的主题性。结果:确定了四个核心主题和十一个子主题,并将其汇总为四个基本能力领域:“了解当地数字健康生态系统和景观”,“安全,可靠和道德的信息素养和管理”,“精通数字健康工具和相关技术”和“学术研究和循证实践”。医学教育工作者和数字部门专家与会者为课程内容审议提供了最大的数据来源。学生们表现出不同程度的天赋、信心和对技术的兴趣。结论:我们与学习者、教育者和数字健康专家的平衡参与,能够为即将毕业的医学生确定一个与上下文相关的最低基本数字健康能力领域框架。确定重点突出的临床相关核心能力,使其能够融入根据当地情况量身定制的现有课程。这种方法解决了有限的课程空间的局限性,并适应了学生在技术方面的不同兴趣、信心和能力。交付方法应考虑以学生为中心的自适应模式,利用人工智能(AI)的进步作为有效的教学工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信