A Cross-Sectional Online Study of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Research as Perceived by Nursing Students.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251330866
Abdullah Algunmeeyn, Majd T Mrayyan
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Online Study of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Research as Perceived by Nursing Students.","authors":"Abdullah Algunmeeyn, Majd T Mrayyan","doi":"10.1177/23779608251330866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare in general and scientific research in particular has become increasingly prevalent as it holds great promise for optimizing research processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study described predictors and differences in students' perceptions of the risks and benefits related to using AI in nursing research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative transverse study was implemented utilizing a convenient sample of 434 nursing students from a governmental university. Data were analyzed using many descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing students perceived AI in nursing research positively, with an overall mean score of 3.24/5 (SE = .024). Their feelings about AI were generally positive (Mean = 3.54/5; SE = .049; 95% CI = 3.45-3.64). Perceived risks of using AI in research were high (Mean = 1.59/2, SE = .016), especially concerning liability issues (Mean = 3.50/5, SE = .031), communication barriers (Mean = 3.48, SE = .035), unregulated standards (Mean = 3.37, SE = .034), privacy concerns (Mean = 3.37, SE = .034), social biases (Mean = 3.33, SE = .033), performance anxiety (Mean = 3.31, SE = .034), and mistrust in AI mechanisms (Mean = 3.28, SE = .032). The perceived benefits were also high (Mean = 3.46, SE = .030), with a strong intention to use AI-based tools (Mean = 3.52, SE = .033). Key predictors were high GPA and training in public hospitals. hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI in nursing research has many benefits; however, it comes with risks that need immediate management. Nursing students' GPAs and the hospitals where they received their training were often the key factors that shaped how well they understood the use of AI in nursing research. High-achieving students who were trained in public and teaching hospitals tend to be better users of AI in nursing research.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251330866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251330866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare in general and scientific research in particular has become increasingly prevalent as it holds great promise for optimizing research processes and outcomes.

Aims: This study described predictors and differences in students' perceptions of the risks and benefits related to using AI in nursing research.

Methods: A quantitative transverse study was implemented utilizing a convenient sample of 434 nursing students from a governmental university. Data were analyzed using many descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Nursing students perceived AI in nursing research positively, with an overall mean score of 3.24/5 (SE = .024). Their feelings about AI were generally positive (Mean = 3.54/5; SE = .049; 95% CI = 3.45-3.64). Perceived risks of using AI in research were high (Mean = 1.59/2, SE = .016), especially concerning liability issues (Mean = 3.50/5, SE = .031), communication barriers (Mean = 3.48, SE = .035), unregulated standards (Mean = 3.37, SE = .034), privacy concerns (Mean = 3.37, SE = .034), social biases (Mean = 3.33, SE = .033), performance anxiety (Mean = 3.31, SE = .034), and mistrust in AI mechanisms (Mean = 3.28, SE = .032). The perceived benefits were also high (Mean = 3.46, SE = .030), with a strong intention to use AI-based tools (Mean = 3.52, SE = .033). Key predictors were high GPA and training in public hospitals. hospitals.

Conclusion: AI in nursing research has many benefits; however, it comes with risks that need immediate management. Nursing students' GPAs and the hospitals where they received their training were often the key factors that shaped how well they understood the use of AI in nursing research. High-achieving students who were trained in public and teaching hospitals tend to be better users of AI in nursing research.

护理学生在护理研究中使用人工智能的横断面在线研究。
背景:人工智能(AI)在医疗保健和科学研究中的应用越来越普遍,因为它对优化研究过程和结果有很大的希望。目的:本研究描述了学生对在护理研究中使用人工智能的风险和收益的感知的预测因素和差异。方法:选取一所公立大学护理专业学生434名方便样本进行定量横向研究。数据分析使用许多描述性和推断性统计。结果:护生对人工智能在护理研究中的应用持肯定态度,总体平均得分为3.24/5 (SE = 0.024)。他们对人工智能的感觉总体是积极的(均值= 3.54/5;se = .049;95% ci = 3.45-3.64)。在研究中使用人工智能的感知风险很高(均值= 1.59/2,SE = 0.016),特别是在责任问题(均值= 3.50/5,SE = 0.031)、沟通障碍(均值= 3.48,SE = 0.035)、不规范的标准(均值= 3.37,SE = 0.034)、隐私问题(均值= 3.37,SE = 0.034)、社会偏见(均值= 3.33,SE = 0.033)、表现焦虑(均值= 3.31,SE = 0.034)和对人工智能机制的不信任(均值= 3.28,SE = 0.032)方面。感知到的益处也很高(Mean = 3.46, SE = 0.030),使用基于人工智能的工具的意愿很强(Mean = 3.52, SE = 0.033)。主要的预测因素是高GPA和在公立医院的培训。医院。结论:人工智能在护理研究中有诸多益处;然而,它带来了需要立即管理的风险。护理专业学生的gpa和他们接受培训的医院通常是影响他们对人工智能在护理研究中的应用的理解程度的关键因素。在公立医院和教学医院接受培训的成绩优异的学生往往是人工智能在护理研究中的更好使用者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信