Comparison of Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop with NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II to diagnose color-vision deficiency.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kumiko Mokuno, Hiroki Kaneko, Hirotaka Ito, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tetsushi Yasuma
{"title":"Comparison of Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop with NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II to diagnose color-vision deficiency.","authors":"Kumiko Mokuno, Hiroki Kaneko, Hirotaka Ito, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tetsushi Yasuma","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01198-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the degree of agreement between the results of the Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop (HMC) and NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II (OT-II).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 53 patients who underwent color-vision testing at Kariya Toyota General Hospital between March 2019 and April 2022. The participants included 2 patients with normal color vision, 10 with protanopia, 3 with protanomaly, 22 with deuteranopia, and 16 with deuteranomaly. Color-vision testing was performed using the Ishihara Test for Colour Deficiency, Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates Part 1, Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness Panel-15, HMC, and OT-II. An agreement was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values of the equal values obtained from HMC and OT-II were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICCs between the results of HMC and OT-II were 0.979, 0.979, and 0.985, for the minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and 0.943, 0.755, and 0.919 for the yellow monochromatic values, respectively (p < 0.0001 in all). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the differences were mostly within the limits of agreement. Fixed errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and minimum yellow monochromatic values. Proportional errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HMC and OT-II showed high agreement for all values in the ICC and Bland-Altman analyses. In the Bland-Altman analysis, systemic errors were observed in the maximum red-green mixture value and the minimum and maximum yellow monochromatic values.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01198-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the degree of agreement between the results of the Heidelberg Multi-Color Anomaloskop (HMC) and NEITZ anomaloscope OT-II (OT-II).

Study design: Retrospective.

Methods: The study included 53 patients who underwent color-vision testing at Kariya Toyota General Hospital between March 2019 and April 2022. The participants included 2 patients with normal color vision, 10 with protanopia, 3 with protanomaly, 22 with deuteranopia, and 16 with deuteranomaly. Color-vision testing was performed using the Ishihara Test for Colour Deficiency, Standard Pseudoisochromatic Plates Part 1, Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness Panel-15, HMC, and OT-II. An agreement was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values of the equal values obtained from HMC and OT-II were examined.

Results: The ICCs between the results of HMC and OT-II were 0.979, 0.979, and 0.985, for the minimum, median, and maximum red-green mixture and 0.943, 0.755, and 0.919 for the yellow monochromatic values, respectively (p < 0.0001 in all). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the differences were mostly within the limits of agreement. Fixed errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and minimum yellow monochromatic values. Proportional errors were observed for the maximum red-green mixture and yellow monochromatic values.

Conclusions: HMC and OT-II showed high agreement for all values in the ICC and Bland-Altman analyses. In the Bland-Altman analysis, systemic errors were observed in the maximum red-green mixture value and the minimum and maximum yellow monochromatic values.

海德堡多色异常仪与NEITZ异常镜OT-II诊断色觉缺陷的比较。
目的:确定Heidelberg多色异常表(HMC)与NEITZ异常镜OT-II (OT-II)结果的吻合程度。研究设计:回顾性。方法:该研究包括53名患者,他们于2019年3月至2022年4月在Kariya Toyota总医院接受了色视力测试。色觉正常2例,原色盲10例,原色盲异常3例,后色盲22例,后色盲异常16例。色觉测试采用石原色觉缺陷测试、标准假等色板第1部分、范斯沃斯色盲二分类测试Panel-15、HMC和OT-II。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析来确定一致性。对HMC和OT-II获得的等值的最小、中位数和最大红绿混合值和黄色单色值进行检测。结果:HMC和OT-II的最小、中位和最大红绿混合物的ICCs分别为0.979、0.979和0.985,黄色单色值的ICCs分别为0.943、0.755和0.919 (p)。结论:HMC和OT-II在ICC和Bland-Altman分析中显示出高度一致的所有值。在Bland-Altman分析中,在最大红绿混合值以及最小和最大黄单色值中观察到系统误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信