[Risk Assessment of Soil Heavy Metal Sources in the Lower Reaches of the Jinling River Based on PMF Model and Geodetector].

Q2 Environmental Science
Yu-Ru Li, Wei-Jie Duan, Jia-Zhen Dong, Jun Zhang
{"title":"[Risk Assessment of Soil Heavy Metal Sources in the Lower Reaches of the Jinling River Based on PMF Model and Geodetector].","authors":"Yu-Ru Li, Wei-Jie Duan, Jia-Zhen Dong, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202404001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To understand the pollution characteristics and sources of heavy metals in the soil of the lower reaches of the Jinling River, 41 samples of surface soil in the lower reaches of the Jinling River were collected, and the contents of eight heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) were determined by high-precision X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (HDXRF). Correlation analysis and positive matrix factorization model (PMF) were used to analyze the sources of heavy metals in the soil. The potential ecological risk assessment model based on source was used to analyze the potential ecological risk under different pollution sources, and the influencing factors of ecological risk of each pollution source were analyzed by means of geographical detector. The results showed that: ① The average values of eight heavy metal elements in soil were lower than the risk screening values of soil pollution but higher than the soil background values of Shaanxi Province. The spatial variability of Zn, Cd, and Pb was large, which was mainly affected by human activities. ② The heavy metals in the soil of the study area were mainly from industrial sources, traffic sources, natural sources, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources, and the contribution rates of each pollution source were 16.51%, 23.68%, 51.08%, and 8.73%, respectively. Based on the source-based potential ecological risk assessment, the potential ecological risk index (RI) of industrial sources, traffic sources, natural sources, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources were 34.11, 85.03, 16.76, and 21.19, respectively. Cd was the priority control element, and traffic sources were the priority control sources. ③ The distance from key enterprises, the distance from highway, sand content, and land use type were the main influencing factors of the industrial source, traffic source, natural source, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources, respectively. The results of this study can provide scientific basis for environmental management and pollution control of heavy metals in soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 4","pages":"2512-2524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand the pollution characteristics and sources of heavy metals in the soil of the lower reaches of the Jinling River, 41 samples of surface soil in the lower reaches of the Jinling River were collected, and the contents of eight heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) were determined by high-precision X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (HDXRF). Correlation analysis and positive matrix factorization model (PMF) were used to analyze the sources of heavy metals in the soil. The potential ecological risk assessment model based on source was used to analyze the potential ecological risk under different pollution sources, and the influencing factors of ecological risk of each pollution source were analyzed by means of geographical detector. The results showed that: ① The average values of eight heavy metal elements in soil were lower than the risk screening values of soil pollution but higher than the soil background values of Shaanxi Province. The spatial variability of Zn, Cd, and Pb was large, which was mainly affected by human activities. ② The heavy metals in the soil of the study area were mainly from industrial sources, traffic sources, natural sources, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources, and the contribution rates of each pollution source were 16.51%, 23.68%, 51.08%, and 8.73%, respectively. Based on the source-based potential ecological risk assessment, the potential ecological risk index (RI) of industrial sources, traffic sources, natural sources, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources were 34.11, 85.03, 16.76, and 21.19, respectively. Cd was the priority control element, and traffic sources were the priority control sources. ③ The distance from key enterprises, the distance from highway, sand content, and land use type were the main influencing factors of the industrial source, traffic source, natural source, and agricultural-industrial mixed sources, respectively. The results of this study can provide scientific basis for environmental management and pollution control of heavy metals in soil.

基于PMF模型和地理探测器的金陵江下游土壤重金属源风险评价[j]。
为了解金陵江下游土壤重金属污染特征及来源,采集了41个金陵江下游表层土壤样品,采用高精度x射线荧光光谱仪(HDXRF)测定了8种重金属(Cr、Mn、Ni、Cu、Zn、As、Cd、Pb)的含量。采用相关分析和正矩阵分解模型(PMF)对土壤中重金属的来源进行分析。采用基于污染源的潜在生态风险评价模型,分析了不同污染源下的潜在生态风险,并通过地理探测器对各污染源的生态风险影响因素进行了分析。结果表明:①土壤中8种重金属元素的平均值低于土壤污染风险筛选值,高于陕西省土壤背景值;Zn、Cd和Pb的空间变异性较大,主要受人类活动的影响。②研究区土壤重金属主要来自工业源、交通源、自然源和农工混合源,各污染源的贡献率分别为16.51%、23.68%、51.08%和8.73%。基于源的潜在生态风险评价结果显示,工业源、交通源、自然源和农工混合源的潜在生态风险指数(RI)分别为34.11、85.03、16.76和21.19。Cd为优先控制元素,流量源为优先控制源。③与重点企业的距离、与公路的距离、含沙量和土地利用类型分别是工业源、交通源、自然源和农工混合源的主要影响因素。研究结果可为土壤重金属环境管理和污染控制提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信