Rewinding the clock on positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: does it predict prognosis in low-risk disease?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Diletta Fumagalli, Emilia Palmieri, Giuseppe Caruso, Luigi A De Vitis, Ilaria Capasso, Benoit Guillot, Giulia Pappalettera, Tommaso Occhiali, Angela J Fought, Michaela E McGree, Carrie Langstraat, Evelyn Reynolds, Andrea Mariani, Gretchen E Glaser
{"title":"Rewinding the clock on positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: does it predict prognosis in low-risk disease?","authors":"Diletta Fumagalli, Emilia Palmieri, Giuseppe Caruso, Luigi A De Vitis, Ilaria Capasso, Benoit Guillot, Giulia Pappalettera, Tommaso Occhiali, Angela J Fought, Michaela E McGree, Carrie Langstraat, Evelyn Reynolds, Andrea Mariani, Gretchen E Glaser","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer is a known risk factor for worse oncologic outcomes but is not used for staging purposes or to guide adjuvant treatment. Additionally, its prognostic impact on low-risk patients remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and focused on low-risk disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for endometrial cancer at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2021. The role of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in the entire cohort and in 2 subgroups: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to NCCN guidelines (endometrioid, grade 1-2, stage IA) and the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines (as NCCN, plus no lymphovascular space invasion). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of positive peritoneal cytology with recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in all groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3517 patients were included, 1911 in the NCCN low-risk group and 1832 in the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group. Positive peritoneal cytology was found in 15.9% of the entire cohort (559/3517), 8.1% of the NCCN low-risk group (154/1911), and 7.9% of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group (145/1832). In both low-risk groups, 5-year recurrence-free survival was worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively), but there was no difference in overall survival. On univariate analysis, age, tumor grade, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant predictors of recurrence in both subgroups. After multivariable analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained independently associated with recurrence (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive peritoneal cytology was an independent predictor of recurrence and was associated with worse recurrence-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. However, overall survival was not impacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101814"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer is a known risk factor for worse oncologic outcomes but is not used for staging purposes or to guide adjuvant treatment. Additionally, its prognostic impact on low-risk patients remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and focused on low-risk disease.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for endometrial cancer at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2021. The role of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in the entire cohort and in 2 subgroups: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to NCCN guidelines (endometrioid, grade 1-2, stage IA) and the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines (as NCCN, plus no lymphovascular space invasion). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of positive peritoneal cytology with recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in all groups.

Results: A total of 3517 patients were included, 1911 in the NCCN low-risk group and 1832 in the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group. Positive peritoneal cytology was found in 15.9% of the entire cohort (559/3517), 8.1% of the NCCN low-risk group (154/1911), and 7.9% of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group (145/1832). In both low-risk groups, 5-year recurrence-free survival was worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively), but there was no difference in overall survival. On univariate analysis, age, tumor grade, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant predictors of recurrence in both subgroups. After multivariable analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained independently associated with recurrence (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively).

Conclusions: Positive peritoneal cytology was an independent predictor of recurrence and was associated with worse recurrence-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. However, overall survival was not impacted.

子宫内膜癌腹膜细胞学阳性的时钟倒转:它能预测低风险疾病的预后吗?
目的:子宫内膜癌腹膜细胞学阳性是已知的恶性肿瘤预后的危险因素,但不用于分期目的或指导辅助治疗。此外,其对低危患者的预后影响尚不清楚。因此,我们研究了腹膜细胞学阳性在子宫内膜癌患者中的作用,并重点关注低风险疾病。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括1999年至2021年在梅奥诊所接受子宫内膜癌初次手术的所有连续患者。在整个队列和2个亚组中研究腹膜细胞学阳性的作用:国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)低危组,包括按照NCCN指南的低危患者(子宫内膜样,1-2级,IA期)和欧洲妇科肿瘤学会/欧洲放射与肿瘤学会/欧洲病理学会(ESGO/ESTRO/ESP)低危组,包括按照ESGO/ESTRO/ESP指南的低危患者(作为NCCN,加上无淋巴血管间隙侵犯)。采用单因素和多因素分析评估腹膜细胞学阳性与术后5年内复发的关系,并对所有组进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析。结果:共纳入3517例患者,其中NCCN低危组1911例,ESGO/ESTRO/ESP低危组1832例。腹膜细胞学阳性在整个队列中占15.9%(559/3517),在NCCN低危组中占8.1%(154/1911),在ESGO/ESTRO/ESP低危组中占7.9%(145/1832)。在两个低危组中,腹膜细胞学阳性患者的5年无复发生存率较差(p < 0.01和p = 0.03),但总生存率无差异。在单因素分析中,年龄、肿瘤分级和腹膜细胞学阳性是两个亚组复发的重要预测因素。多变量分析后,腹膜细胞学阳性仍与复发独立相关(分别p < 0.01和p = 0.03)。结论:腹膜细胞学阳性是复发的独立预测因子,与低风险子宫内膜癌患者较差的无复发生存相关。然而,总体生存没有受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信