Influence of sex and aerobic fitness on blood pressure during maximal treadmill exercise in young healthy adults.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00056.2025
Sydney E Hilton, Johan S Thiessen, Alise D Rycroft, Natalie I Miners, Julian C Bommarito, Tanvir S Matharu, Pardeep K Khangura, Rileigh K Stapleton, Leilani C Rocha, Massimo Nardone, Philip J Millar
{"title":"Influence of sex and aerobic fitness on blood pressure during maximal treadmill exercise in young healthy adults.","authors":"Sydney E Hilton, Johan S Thiessen, Alise D Rycroft, Natalie I Miners, Julian C Bommarito, Tanvir S Matharu, Pardeep K Khangura, Rileigh K Stapleton, Leilani C Rocha, Massimo Nardone, Philip J Millar","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00056.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of future hypertension but commonly observed in athletes despite their reduced cardiovascular risk. Normalizing exercise BP to metabolic or mechanical work may provide better discrimination between physiological and pathological responses. This study investigated the effects of sex and aerobic fitness on peak systolic BP (SBP) and peak SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope). One hundred and eleven healthy adults (22 ± 5 years; 51 female) performed a graded maximal treadmill exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with brachial BP measured using automated auscultation (Tango M2, SunTech Medical). Peak oxygen uptake rate (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Males had a higher relative V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01) but not V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> percentile (<i>P</i> = 0.16). Peak SBP was higher in males (208 ± 26 vs. 182 ± 23 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.01), while the SBP/MET slope did not differ between sexes (6.5 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 mmHg/MET, <i>P</i> = 0.60). Adjustment for differences in body mass index and V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> did not alter these results. The SBP-V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> regression slope did not differ between sexes (<i>P</i> = 0.92), with both slopes not different from zero (both, <i>P</i> > 0.47). The SBP/MET-V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> regression slope did not differ between sexes (<i>P</i> = 0.43), but both slopes were different from zero (both, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The present cohort demonstrated sex differences in peak SBP but not the SBP/MET slope. The SBP/MET slope was lower in individuals with higher aerobic fitness, but the influence of V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> did not differ between sexes. Using the SBP/MET slope in cross-sectional studies can reduce the confounding effects of sex on peak SBP, but differences in participant aerobic fitness should be considered.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Higher peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise is linked with an increased risk of developing hypertension. It has been suggested that exercise SBP should be normalized to mechanical or metabolic work to account for differences in aerobic fitness. We found that the influence of aerobic fitness on peak SBP or SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope) does not differ between sexes but that the SBP/MET slope is lower in participants with higher aerobic fitness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1321-1326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00056.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of future hypertension but commonly observed in athletes despite their reduced cardiovascular risk. Normalizing exercise BP to metabolic or mechanical work may provide better discrimination between physiological and pathological responses. This study investigated the effects of sex and aerobic fitness on peak systolic BP (SBP) and peak SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope). One hundred and eleven healthy adults (22 ± 5 years; 51 female) performed a graded maximal treadmill exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with brachial BP measured using automated auscultation (Tango M2, SunTech Medical). Peak oxygen uptake rate (V̇o2peak) was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Males had a higher relative V̇o2peak (P < 0.01) but not V̇o2peak percentile (P = 0.16). Peak SBP was higher in males (208 ± 26 vs. 182 ± 23 mmHg, P < 0.01), while the SBP/MET slope did not differ between sexes (6.5 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 mmHg/MET, P = 0.60). Adjustment for differences in body mass index and V̇o2peak did not alter these results. The SBP-V̇o2peak regression slope did not differ between sexes (P = 0.92), with both slopes not different from zero (both, P > 0.47). The SBP/MET-V̇o2peak regression slope did not differ between sexes (P = 0.43), but both slopes were different from zero (both, P < 0.001). The present cohort demonstrated sex differences in peak SBP but not the SBP/MET slope. The SBP/MET slope was lower in individuals with higher aerobic fitness, but the influence of V̇o2peak did not differ between sexes. Using the SBP/MET slope in cross-sectional studies can reduce the confounding effects of sex on peak SBP, but differences in participant aerobic fitness should be considered.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Higher peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise is linked with an increased risk of developing hypertension. It has been suggested that exercise SBP should be normalized to mechanical or metabolic work to account for differences in aerobic fitness. We found that the influence of aerobic fitness on peak SBP or SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope) does not differ between sexes but that the SBP/MET slope is lower in participants with higher aerobic fitness.

性别和有氧适能对年轻健康成人最大跑步机运动时血压的影响。
过高的运动血压(BP)是未来高血压的一个预测指标,但在运动员中很常见,尽管他们的心血管风险降低了。使运动血压与代谢或机械功的关系正常化可以更好地区分生理和病理反应。本研究探讨了性别和有氧适应度对峰值收缩压(SBP)和每代谢当量峰值收缩压(SBP/MET斜率)的影响。健康成人111例(22±5岁);51名女性)进行了最大限度的跑步机运动(改进的Bruce方案),并使用自动听诊测量了肱BP (Tango M2, SunTech Medical)。采用间接量热法测定峰值摄氧量(⩒O2peak)。男性相对⩒O2peak (P2peak百分位数)较高(P=0.16)。男性收缩压峰值较高(208±26比182±23 mmHg, PP=0.60)。调整体重指数和⩒o2峰值的差异并没有改变这些结果。SBP-⩒o2峰回归斜率在两性之间没有差异(P=0.92),两个斜率都接近于零(P均为0.47)。SBP/MET-⩒o2峰回归斜率在两性间无显著差异(P=0.43),但斜率均不为零(两者,p2峰在两性间无显著差异)。在横断面研究中使用收缩压/MET斜率可以减少性别对收缩压峰值的混淆影响,但应考虑参与者有氧适能的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信