Sydney E Hilton, Johan S Thiessen, Alise D Rycroft, Natalie I Miners, Julian C Bommarito, Tanvir S Matharu, Pardeep K Khangura, Rileigh K Stapleton, Leilani C Rocha, Massimo Nardone, Philip J Millar
{"title":"Influence of sex and aerobic fitness on blood pressure during maximal treadmill exercise in young healthy adults.","authors":"Sydney E Hilton, Johan S Thiessen, Alise D Rycroft, Natalie I Miners, Julian C Bommarito, Tanvir S Matharu, Pardeep K Khangura, Rileigh K Stapleton, Leilani C Rocha, Massimo Nardone, Philip J Millar","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00056.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of future hypertension but commonly observed in athletes despite their reduced cardiovascular risk. Normalizing exercise BP to metabolic or mechanical work may provide better discrimination between physiological and pathological responses. This study investigated the effects of sex and aerobic fitness on peak systolic BP (SBP) and peak SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope). One hundred and eleven healthy adults (22 ± 5 years; 51 female) performed a graded maximal treadmill exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with brachial BP measured using automated auscultation (Tango M2, SunTech Medical). Peak oxygen uptake rate (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Males had a higher relative V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01) but not V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> percentile (<i>P</i> = 0.16). Peak SBP was higher in males (208 ± 26 vs. 182 ± 23 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.01), while the SBP/MET slope did not differ between sexes (6.5 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 mmHg/MET, <i>P</i> = 0.60). Adjustment for differences in body mass index and V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> did not alter these results. The SBP-V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> regression slope did not differ between sexes (<i>P</i> = 0.92), with both slopes not different from zero (both, <i>P</i> > 0.47). The SBP/MET-V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> regression slope did not differ between sexes (<i>P</i> = 0.43), but both slopes were different from zero (both, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The present cohort demonstrated sex differences in peak SBP but not the SBP/MET slope. The SBP/MET slope was lower in individuals with higher aerobic fitness, but the influence of V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> did not differ between sexes. Using the SBP/MET slope in cross-sectional studies can reduce the confounding effects of sex on peak SBP, but differences in participant aerobic fitness should be considered.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Higher peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise is linked with an increased risk of developing hypertension. It has been suggested that exercise SBP should be normalized to mechanical or metabolic work to account for differences in aerobic fitness. We found that the influence of aerobic fitness on peak SBP or SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope) does not differ between sexes but that the SBP/MET slope is lower in participants with higher aerobic fitness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1321-1326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00056.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of future hypertension but commonly observed in athletes despite their reduced cardiovascular risk. Normalizing exercise BP to metabolic or mechanical work may provide better discrimination between physiological and pathological responses. This study investigated the effects of sex and aerobic fitness on peak systolic BP (SBP) and peak SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope). One hundred and eleven healthy adults (22 ± 5 years; 51 female) performed a graded maximal treadmill exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with brachial BP measured using automated auscultation (Tango M2, SunTech Medical). Peak oxygen uptake rate (V̇o2peak) was assessed using indirect calorimetry. Males had a higher relative V̇o2peak (P < 0.01) but not V̇o2peak percentile (P = 0.16). Peak SBP was higher in males (208 ± 26 vs. 182 ± 23 mmHg, P < 0.01), while the SBP/MET slope did not differ between sexes (6.5 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 2.6 mmHg/MET, P = 0.60). Adjustment for differences in body mass index and V̇o2peak did not alter these results. The SBP-V̇o2peak regression slope did not differ between sexes (P = 0.92), with both slopes not different from zero (both, P > 0.47). The SBP/MET-V̇o2peak regression slope did not differ between sexes (P = 0.43), but both slopes were different from zero (both, P < 0.001). The present cohort demonstrated sex differences in peak SBP but not the SBP/MET slope. The SBP/MET slope was lower in individuals with higher aerobic fitness, but the influence of V̇o2peak did not differ between sexes. Using the SBP/MET slope in cross-sectional studies can reduce the confounding effects of sex on peak SBP, but differences in participant aerobic fitness should be considered.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Higher peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise is linked with an increased risk of developing hypertension. It has been suggested that exercise SBP should be normalized to mechanical or metabolic work to account for differences in aerobic fitness. We found that the influence of aerobic fitness on peak SBP or SBP per metabolic equivalent (SBP/MET slope) does not differ between sexes but that the SBP/MET slope is lower in participants with higher aerobic fitness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.