Factors influencing mask use and physical distancing for COVID-19: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i2.614
Dachi I Arikpo, Okwu A Onyema, Afiong O Oku, Chibueze Meremikwu, Hannah Hamilton-Hurwitz, João P Toledo, Kathleen Dunn, April Baller, Helen J Smith, Martin M Meremikwu
{"title":"Factors influencing mask use and physical distancing for COVID-19: A qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Dachi I Arikpo, Okwu A Onyema, Afiong O Oku, Chibueze Meremikwu, Hannah Hamilton-Hurwitz, João P Toledo, Kathleen Dunn, April Baller, Helen J Smith, Martin M Meremikwu","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i2.614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a bundle of precautions to reduce community transmission of COVID-19, including mask use and physical distancing. However, there is evidence that suggests poor adherence to these health measures community settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarise qualitative research evidence on the perceptions and factors influencing masks use and physical distancing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We included studies conducted in community settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted using search terms derived from the inclusion criteria and combined in a peer-reviewed search strategy. Thirty studies were sampled. Qualitative data analysis was performed using the thematic synthesis approach. The confidence in each review finding was ascertained using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations - Confidence in the evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten analytical themes of low to high confidence were identified. Values, belief systems and cultural norms shaped the perception and uptake of mask use and physical distancing. Key barriers included the cost of masks, limited infrastructure for spatial separation and inconsistent political or government messaging, while visual cues and social responsibility facilitated adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personal values and preferences influenced individuals' adherence to these public health measures. Political or government messaging is important to aid understanding and adherence.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Insights provided by this synthesis can support future emergency preparedness and response to outbreaks of acute respiratory infections by providing policy makers with information needed to make contextually relevant recommendations to enhance adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 2","pages":"614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i2.614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a bundle of precautions to reduce community transmission of COVID-19, including mask use and physical distancing. However, there is evidence that suggests poor adherence to these health measures community settings.

Aim: To summarise qualitative research evidence on the perceptions and factors influencing masks use and physical distancing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Setting: We included studies conducted in community settings.

Method: An electronic database search was conducted using search terms derived from the inclusion criteria and combined in a peer-reviewed search strategy. Thirty studies were sampled. Qualitative data analysis was performed using the thematic synthesis approach. The confidence in each review finding was ascertained using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations - Confidence in the evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.

Results: Ten analytical themes of low to high confidence were identified. Values, belief systems and cultural norms shaped the perception and uptake of mask use and physical distancing. Key barriers included the cost of masks, limited infrastructure for spatial separation and inconsistent political or government messaging, while visual cues and social responsibility facilitated adherence.

Conclusion: Personal values and preferences influenced individuals' adherence to these public health measures. Political or government messaging is important to aid understanding and adherence.

Contribution: Insights provided by this synthesis can support future emergency preparedness and response to outbreaks of acute respiratory infections by providing policy makers with information needed to make contextually relevant recommendations to enhance adherence.

影响COVID-19口罩使用和保持身体距离的因素:定性证据综合
背景:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议采取一系列预防措施,包括使用口罩和保持身体距离,以减少COVID-19的社区传播。然而,有证据表明,社区环境对这些卫生措施的依从性较差。目的:总结新冠肺炎大流行背景下影响口罩使用和保持身体距离的认知和因素的定性研究证据。环境:我们纳入了在社区环境中进行的研究。方法:使用从纳入标准中衍生的搜索词并结合同行评审搜索策略进行电子数据库搜索。30个研究样本。采用专题综合方法进行定性数据分析。使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级-定性研究综述证据的置信度(GRADE-CERQual)方法确定每个综述发现的置信度。结果:确定了十个低至高置信度的分析主题。价值观、信仰体系和文化规范塑造了人们对使用口罩和保持身体距离的看法和接受程度。主要障碍包括口罩的成本、空间隔离基础设施有限以及政治或政府信息不一致,而视觉提示和社会责任则有助于遵守规定。结论:个人价值观和偏好影响个人对这些公共卫生措施的依从性。政治或政府信息对于帮助理解和遵守很重要。贡献:本综合报告提供的见解可为决策者提供必要信息,以提出与具体情况相关的建议,加强依从性,从而支持未来对急性呼吸道感染暴发的应急准备和应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信