A heretical point of view in masonry structures dynamics.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241148
Mario Argenziano, Enrico Babilio, Yoshiki Ikeda, Massimiliano Fraldi
{"title":"A <i>heretical</i> point of view in masonry structures dynamics.","authors":"Mario Argenziano, Enrico Babilio, Yoshiki Ikeda, Massimiliano Fraldi","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protection from static and dynamic actions is an urgent matter for masonry buildings, which constitute the majority of the world's architectural heritage. For this reason, the search for best strategies to analyse the mechanical responses of such structures under both dead and seismic loads has been at the centre of a vivid debate within the scientific community for decades. Although many different approaches and computational methods have been proposed in the literature over the years, most of them make reference to no-tension materials, starting from the pioneering work by Heyman in the framework of limit analysis. However, implementing the hypothesis of masonry walls made by rigid blocks interacting through no-tension interfaces often leads to inconsistent results due to possible interpenetrating elements. In dynamic simulations, undesired blocks' interpenetration forces algorithms to continuously check the compatibility and to eventually stop and restart the analysis with somehow arbitrary initial conditions. By introducing well-established hyperelastic and friction laws at bricks' interfaces, we propose a <i>heretical</i> strategy that overcomes some difficulties of the above-mentioned approaches, recovering physical consistency and avoiding any interpenetrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 4","pages":"241148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protection from static and dynamic actions is an urgent matter for masonry buildings, which constitute the majority of the world's architectural heritage. For this reason, the search for best strategies to analyse the mechanical responses of such structures under both dead and seismic loads has been at the centre of a vivid debate within the scientific community for decades. Although many different approaches and computational methods have been proposed in the literature over the years, most of them make reference to no-tension materials, starting from the pioneering work by Heyman in the framework of limit analysis. However, implementing the hypothesis of masonry walls made by rigid blocks interacting through no-tension interfaces often leads to inconsistent results due to possible interpenetrating elements. In dynamic simulations, undesired blocks' interpenetration forces algorithms to continuously check the compatibility and to eventually stop and restart the analysis with somehow arbitrary initial conditions. By introducing well-established hyperelastic and friction laws at bricks' interfaces, we propose a heretical strategy that overcomes some difficulties of the above-mentioned approaches, recovering physical consistency and avoiding any interpenetrations.

砖石结构动力学的异教观点。
砖石建筑构成了世界建筑遗产的绝大部分,保护砖石建筑不受静动力作用的影响是当务之急。由于这个原因,寻找最佳策略来分析这种结构在死亡和地震载荷下的机械反应,几十年来一直是科学界激烈辩论的中心。虽然多年来在文献中提出了许多不同的方法和计算方法,但大多数都是参考无张力材料,从海曼在极限分析框架下的开创性工作开始。然而,实施刚性砌块通过无张力界面相互作用的砌体墙假设,由于可能存在互穿元素,结果往往不一致。在动态模拟中,不希望的块的相互渗透迫使算法不断检查兼容性,并最终在某种任意初始条件下停止和重新开始分析。通过在砖的界面上引入成熟的超弹性和摩擦定律,我们提出了一种非常规的策略,克服了上述方法的一些困难,恢复了物理一致性并避免了任何相互渗透。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信