Evolving Indications, Challenges, and Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Temidayo A Abe, Endurance O Evbayekha, Larry R Jackson, Sana M Al-Khatib, Sabra C Lewsey, Khadijah Breathett
{"title":"Evolving Indications, Challenges, and Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure.","authors":"Temidayo A Abe, Endurance O Evbayekha, Larry R Jackson, Sana M Al-Khatib, Sabra C Lewsey, Khadijah Breathett","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing has markedly improved heart failure outcomes over the past two decades. However, some patients show no clinical improvement or evidence of reverse remodeling following device implantation. Challenges include suboptimal patient selection, limitations in the characterization of conduction disease (especially nonspecific interventricular conduction delays), procedural constraints, inappropriate device programming, and delayed referral. Moreover, there remains no formal consensus on evaluating and characterizing CRT efficacy. Underutilization persists among women and minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Targeted research addressing unmet needs has led to evolving guideline indications. Novel electrocardiographic and imaging techniques are continually being developed to improve patient selection and alternate pacing strategies have emerged. Conduction system pacing may allow for a more physiologic approach to CRT. Observational studies and small clinical trials have shown comparable or superior efficacy of conduction system pacing over traditional biventricular pacing; however, more studies are needed. LAY SUMMARY: Cardiac resynchronization therapy via biventricular pacing has transformed heart failure management over the past two decades. This review examines persistent challenges in clinical practice and evolving guideline recommendations. Key issues, including refining patient selection, better characterizing conduction abnormalities, and optimizing device programming, were highlighted. Emerging evidence suggests conduction system pacing as a physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing, with early studies showing promising outcomes. However, rigorous clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and guide future practice. Advancing CRT necessitates continued innovation and strategies to improve equity and access across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing has markedly improved heart failure outcomes over the past two decades. However, some patients show no clinical improvement or evidence of reverse remodeling following device implantation. Challenges include suboptimal patient selection, limitations in the characterization of conduction disease (especially nonspecific interventricular conduction delays), procedural constraints, inappropriate device programming, and delayed referral. Moreover, there remains no formal consensus on evaluating and characterizing CRT efficacy. Underutilization persists among women and minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Targeted research addressing unmet needs has led to evolving guideline indications. Novel electrocardiographic and imaging techniques are continually being developed to improve patient selection and alternate pacing strategies have emerged. Conduction system pacing may allow for a more physiologic approach to CRT. Observational studies and small clinical trials have shown comparable or superior efficacy of conduction system pacing over traditional biventricular pacing; however, more studies are needed. LAY SUMMARY: Cardiac resynchronization therapy via biventricular pacing has transformed heart failure management over the past two decades. This review examines persistent challenges in clinical practice and evolving guideline recommendations. Key issues, including refining patient selection, better characterizing conduction abnormalities, and optimizing device programming, were highlighted. Emerging evidence suggests conduction system pacing as a physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing, with early studies showing promising outcomes. However, rigorous clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and guide future practice. Advancing CRT necessitates continued innovation and strategies to improve equity and access across diverse populations.

心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭的适应症、挑战和进展。
在过去的二十年中,通过双心室起搏的心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)显著改善了心力衰竭的预后。然而,一些患者在植入器械后没有表现出临床改善或反向重塑的迹象。挑战包括不理想的患者选择,传导疾病表征的局限性(特别是非特异性室间传导延迟),程序限制,不适当的设备规划和延迟转诊。此外,在评价和表征CRT疗效方面仍没有正式的共识。妇女和少数民族种族和族裔群体仍然没有充分利用资源。针对未满足需求的针对性研究导致了指南适应症的不断发展。新的心电图和成像技术不断发展,以改善患者的选择和替代起搏策略已经出现。传导系统起搏可能允许更生理的方法来CRT。观察性研究和小型临床试验表明,传导系统起搏与传统双心室起搏的疗效相当或更好;然而,还需要更多的研究。摘要:在过去的二十年中,通过双心室起搏的心脏再同步化治疗已经改变了心力衰竭的治疗方法。本综述探讨了临床实践中持续存在的挑战和不断发展的指南建议。重点强调了关键问题,包括改进患者选择,更好地表征传导异常和优化设备编程。新出现的证据表明,传导系统起搏是双心室起搏的生理替代,早期研究显示出有希望的结果。然而,需要严格的临床试验来证实这些发现并指导未来的实践。推进CRT需要持续的创新和战略,以改善不同人群的公平和获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信