Online Open Book Examination as a Tool for Revision in Forensic Medicine.

Q4 Medicine
Pragnesh Parmar, Divya Reddy, S Yadukul, Prashanth Mada
{"title":"Online Open Book Examination as a Tool for Revision in Forensic Medicine.","authors":"Pragnesh Parmar, Divya Reddy, S Yadukul, Prashanth Mada","doi":"10.1177/19253621251333196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Students find it difficult to retain knowledge given during lectures. Tests should be given frequently to increase retention of information. An open book examination is one where the students can give answers using their textbooks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 'Exam Derived Learning' in the form of an 'Online Open Book Examination' as a revision tool in the subject of Forensic Medicine among second-year MBBS students at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. <b>Materials and methods:</b> An online open book examination was conducted in the form of pretested and validated MCQs after the regular interactive lecture classes on the topic of drowning but before the revision exercise on the same. Feedback from the students was taken on an online open book examination via pretested and validated Likert-scale-type perceptions. The median score of the online open book test was calculated. The perceptions of students' toward online open book examination were assessed via the median score. <b>Results:</b> The median score of the online open book test was nine out of 10, 34.7% of the students secured full marks, and 97.4% of the students secured more than 50% of the score. Students gave favorable feedback for the online open book examination. <b>Conclusion:</b> Open-book tests must be practiced as one of the assessment modules in medical education to enhance retention of knowledge and encourage critical thinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"19253621251333196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621251333196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Students find it difficult to retain knowledge given during lectures. Tests should be given frequently to increase retention of information. An open book examination is one where the students can give answers using their textbooks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 'Exam Derived Learning' in the form of an 'Online Open Book Examination' as a revision tool in the subject of Forensic Medicine among second-year MBBS students at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. Materials and methods: An online open book examination was conducted in the form of pretested and validated MCQs after the regular interactive lecture classes on the topic of drowning but before the revision exercise on the same. Feedback from the students was taken on an online open book examination via pretested and validated Likert-scale-type perceptions. The median score of the online open book test was calculated. The perceptions of students' toward online open book examination were assessed via the median score. Results: The median score of the online open book test was nine out of 10, 34.7% of the students secured full marks, and 97.4% of the students secured more than 50% of the score. Students gave favorable feedback for the online open book examination. Conclusion: Open-book tests must be practiced as one of the assessment modules in medical education to enhance retention of knowledge and encourage critical thinking.

在线开卷考试作为法医学复习工具。
背景:学生发现很难记住课堂上讲授的知识。应该经常进行测试,以增加对信息的记忆。开卷考试是一种学生可以使用课本给出答案的考试。本研究的目的是评估“考试衍生学习”在海得拉巴全印度医学科学学院二年级MBBS学生中以“在线开卷考试”的形式作为法医学科目复习工具的有效性。材料和方法:在线开卷考试以预测和验证mcq的形式进行,在溺水主题的常规互动课堂之后,在该主题的复习练习之前。学生的反馈是通过预先测试和验证的李克特量表类型的感知进行在线开卷考试。计算在线开卷测试的中位数分数。通过中位数分数评估学生对网络开卷考试的认知。结果:网络开卷考试中位数为9分(满分10分),34.7%的学生获得满分,97.4%的学生获得50%以上的分数。学生对网上开卷考试的反馈很好。结论:开卷考试应作为医学教育的考核模块之一,加强知识的记忆,鼓励批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信