Comparison of art preferences in patient rooms between chronic pain patients, palliative care patients and physicians.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1007/s10354-025-01086-8
Alina Balandin, Martin Wallenfang, Kerstin Wagener, Martin Gleim, Dag Konetzka, Dieter Siebrecht, Anke Müffelmann, Susanne Kollmann, Regina Göckede, Christiane Zippel, Almut Linde, Annette Hüsch, Stine Louring Nielsen, Markus Steinfath, Axel Fudickar
{"title":"Comparison of art preferences in patient rooms between chronic pain patients, palliative care patients and physicians.","authors":"Alina Balandin, Martin Wallenfang, Kerstin Wagener, Martin Gleim, Dag Konetzka, Dieter Siebrecht, Anke Müffelmann, Susanne Kollmann, Regina Göckede, Christiane Zippel, Almut Linde, Annette Hüsch, Stine Louring Nielsen, Markus Steinfath, Axel Fudickar","doi":"10.1007/s10354-025-01086-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Art in patient rooms can have positive effects on wellbeing and clinical outcomes. Patients' art preferences may differ from the preferences of medical providers. In this study, chronic pain and palliative care patients' preferences regarding art in patient rooms were compared with physicians' preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a selection of abstract art photographs by artists of the Muthesius University of Fine Arts and Design, Kiel, and figurative paintings from the Kunsthalle zu Kiel, 79 physicians and 79 chronic pain patients were asked to choose a picture. The physicians were also asked which picture they would choose for their patients. Furthermore, 79 palliative care patients were investigated to compare their choices with those of pain patients and physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patient groups preferred figurative art more often than did physicians for their patients. Among palliative care patients, 65% chose figurative art, while only 42% of physicians did (p < 0.0001). Similarly, 67% of chronic pain patients preferred figurative art, in contrast to 42% of physicians (p = 0.0002). The incidence of physicians' art choices for figurative art in patient rooms and for themselves as patients differed significantly (42 vs. 58, p = 0.013). Views with natural elements were preferred by physicians for patients and themselves (49 vs. 30 and 44 vs. 35), by palliative care patients (41 vs. 38), and by chronic pain patients (54 vs. 25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' art preferences differ significantly from physicians' art preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":23882,"journal":{"name":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":"237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-025-01086-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Art in patient rooms can have positive effects on wellbeing and clinical outcomes. Patients' art preferences may differ from the preferences of medical providers. In this study, chronic pain and palliative care patients' preferences regarding art in patient rooms were compared with physicians' preferences.

Methods: From a selection of abstract art photographs by artists of the Muthesius University of Fine Arts and Design, Kiel, and figurative paintings from the Kunsthalle zu Kiel, 79 physicians and 79 chronic pain patients were asked to choose a picture. The physicians were also asked which picture they would choose for their patients. Furthermore, 79 palliative care patients were investigated to compare their choices with those of pain patients and physicians.

Results: Both patient groups preferred figurative art more often than did physicians for their patients. Among palliative care patients, 65% chose figurative art, while only 42% of physicians did (p < 0.0001). Similarly, 67% of chronic pain patients preferred figurative art, in contrast to 42% of physicians (p = 0.0002). The incidence of physicians' art choices for figurative art in patient rooms and for themselves as patients differed significantly (42 vs. 58, p = 0.013). Views with natural elements were preferred by physicians for patients and themselves (49 vs. 30 and 44 vs. 35), by palliative care patients (41 vs. 38), and by chronic pain patients (54 vs. 25).

Conclusion: Patients' art preferences differ significantly from physicians' art preferences.

慢性疼痛患者、姑息治疗患者和内科医生在病房艺术偏好的比较。
背景:病房里的艺术品可以对健康和临床结果产生积极影响。患者的艺术偏好可能与医疗提供者的偏好不同。在这项研究中,慢性疼痛和姑息治疗患者对病房艺术的偏好与医生的偏好进行了比较。方法:从Kiel Muthesius美术与设计大学艺术家的抽象艺术照片和Kiel Kunsthalle zu Kiel的具象绘画中选择79名医生和79名慢性疼痛患者的图片。医生们还被问及他们会为他们的病人选择哪张照片。此外,我们还调查了79名姑息治疗患者,比较他们与疼痛患者和医生的选择。结果:两组患者都比医生更喜欢具象艺术。在姑息治疗患者中,65%的人选择具象艺术,而只有42%的医生选择具象艺术(p )结论:患者的艺术偏好与医生的艺术偏好有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: ''From the microscope to clinical application!'', Scientists from all European countries make available their recent research results and practical experience through Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, the renowned English- and German-language forum. Both original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of clinical and preclinical medicine are presented within the successful framework of thematic issues compiled by guest editors. Selected cutting-edge topics, such as dementia, geriatric oncology, Helicobacter pylori and phytomedicine make the journal a mandatory source of information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信