Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Treatment Using Action Observation Therapy Enhanced by Muscle Synergy-Derived Electrical Stimulation (OTHELLO) in Post-Stroke Patients: A RCT Study Protocol.
{"title":"Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Treatment Using Action Observation Therapy Enhanced by Muscle Synergy-Derived Electrical Stimulation (OTHELLO) in Post-Stroke Patients: A RCT Study Protocol.","authors":"Monia Cabinio, Tiziana Lencioni, Arturo Nuara, Federica Rossetto, Valeria Blasi, Gaia Bailo, Rebecca Cardini, Rita Bertoni, Alessandro Viganò, Mariangela Bianco, Angela Comanducci, Pietro Avanzini, Maurizio Ferrarin, Luca Fornia, Francesca Baglio","doi":"10.1177/11795735251331511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Action Observation Therapy (AOT) and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) are widely adopted techniques for upper-limb rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Although AOT and NMES are individually effective, studies investigating a potential synergistic effect on enhancing rehabilitative outcomes are lacking. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aims at comparing the effect of AOT and NMES applied together (AOT-NMES) on muscle synergies with respect to either AOT alone or a Motor Neutral Observation treatment alone (MNO, involving neither AOT nor NMES) on motor function recovery of upper limb. <b>Design:</b> Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with n = 60 post-stroke patients with resulting upper limb disability, randomly allocated (1:1:1 ratio) in three interventional arms: AOT-NMES (n = 20), AOT (n = 20) and MNO (n = 20). <b>Methods and Analyses:</b> All rehabilitation treatments will consist of n°15 60 min-long rehabilitative sessions. Primary outcome measure will be upper limb motor function, assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for upper limb (FM-UL), collected at the baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and at follow-up (T2, 6-months after T1). Other outcome measures will be collected through a multidimensional evaluation including assessing stroke-associated quality of life, neurophysiological data, biomechanical and MRI measures. The innovative protocol will also be evaluated for usability and safety. <b>Discussion:</b> We expect to determine the efficacy, usability and safety of the AOT-NMES rehabilitation approach for the recovery of upper limb motor function in post-stroke patients. The obtained results will also help reveal the neural underpinnings of motor recovery, as assessed by neurophysiological data, biomechanical and MRI measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"11795735251331511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735251331511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Action Observation Therapy (AOT) and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) are widely adopted techniques for upper-limb rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Although AOT and NMES are individually effective, studies investigating a potential synergistic effect on enhancing rehabilitative outcomes are lacking. Objectives: This study aims at comparing the effect of AOT and NMES applied together (AOT-NMES) on muscle synergies with respect to either AOT alone or a Motor Neutral Observation treatment alone (MNO, involving neither AOT nor NMES) on motor function recovery of upper limb. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with n = 60 post-stroke patients with resulting upper limb disability, randomly allocated (1:1:1 ratio) in three interventional arms: AOT-NMES (n = 20), AOT (n = 20) and MNO (n = 20). Methods and Analyses: All rehabilitation treatments will consist of n°15 60 min-long rehabilitative sessions. Primary outcome measure will be upper limb motor function, assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for upper limb (FM-UL), collected at the baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and at follow-up (T2, 6-months after T1). Other outcome measures will be collected through a multidimensional evaluation including assessing stroke-associated quality of life, neurophysiological data, biomechanical and MRI measures. The innovative protocol will also be evaluated for usability and safety. Discussion: We expect to determine the efficacy, usability and safety of the AOT-NMES rehabilitation approach for the recovery of upper limb motor function in post-stroke patients. The obtained results will also help reveal the neural underpinnings of motor recovery, as assessed by neurophysiological data, biomechanical and MRI measures.