The effect of resistant dextrin on glucose regulation markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.2 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mohammad Rudiansyah, Dina Akeel Salman, Hardik Doshi, Renuka Jyothi S, Debasish Shit, Swati Sharma, Mehran Nouri
{"title":"The effect of resistant dextrin on glucose regulation markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mohammad Rudiansyah, Dina Akeel Salman, Hardik Doshi, Renuka Jyothi S, Debasish Shit, Swati Sharma, Mehran Nouri","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01080-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) necessitates greater efforts to find effective therapeutic agents for this complex condition. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of resistant dextrin (RD) supplementation on markers of glucose regulation in patients with T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2025 aiming to identify RCTs evaluating the effect of RD supplementation on fasting blood sugar (FBS), fasting insulin levels, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with T2D. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The outcome data was pooled using Stata software, version 11.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs (260 participants) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analyses indicated that RD supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c levels (WMD: -0.30%; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.03; P = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%). However, the effect of RD on FBS (WMD: -5.45 mg/dl, 95% CI: -12.38 to 1.93; P = 0.14; I<sup>2</sup>=55.3%) and fasting insulin levels (Hedges' g: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.21; P = 0.28; I<sup>2</sup>=70.4%) was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that RD supplementation may effectively lower HbA1c levels in patients with T2D. However, it is crucial to conduct more clinical studies with adequate sample sizes and rigorous methodologies to develop evidence-based treatment guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01080-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) necessitates greater efforts to find effective therapeutic agents for this complex condition. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of resistant dextrin (RD) supplementation on markers of glucose regulation in patients with T2D.

Methods: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 20, 2025 aiming to identify RCTs evaluating the effect of RD supplementation on fasting blood sugar (FBS), fasting insulin levels, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with T2D. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The outcome data was pooled using Stata software, version 11.2.

Results: Four RCTs (260 participants) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analyses indicated that RD supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c levels (WMD: -0.30%; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.03; P = 0.02; I2=0.0%). However, the effect of RD on FBS (WMD: -5.45 mg/dl, 95% CI: -12.38 to 1.93; P = 0.14; I2=55.3%) and fasting insulin levels (Hedges' g: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.21; P = 0.28; I2=70.4%) was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that RD supplementation may effectively lower HbA1c levels in patients with T2D. However, it is crucial to conduct more clinical studies with adequate sample sizes and rigorous methodologies to develop evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

耐药糊精对2型糖尿病患者葡萄糖调节标志物的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:2型糖尿病(T2D)的患病率不断上升,需要更大的努力来寻找有效的治疗药物来治疗这种复杂的疾病。本研究对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估补充耐药糊精(RD)对T2D患者血糖调节指标的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library数据库,检索时间为2025年3月20日,旨在确定评估RD补充对T2D患者空腹血糖(FBS)、空腹胰岛素水平和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)影响的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算加权平均差异(wmd)和相应的95%置信区间(95% CI)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入的rct的质量。结果数据使用Stata软件汇总,版本11.2。结果:系统评价和荟萃分析纳入4项随机对照试验(260名受试者)。荟萃分析表明,补充RD与HbA1c水平显著降低相关(WMD: -0.30%;95% CI: -0.56 ~ -0.03;p = 0.02;I2 = 0.0%)。然而,RD对FBS的影响(WMD: -5.45 mg/dl, 95% CI: -12.38 ~ 1.93;p = 0.14;I2=55.3%)和空腹胰岛素水平(Hedges' g: -0.26;95% CI: -0.74 ~ 0.21;p = 0.28;I2=70.4%)无统计学意义。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,补充RD可有效降低T2D患者的HbA1c水平。然而,至关重要的是开展更多的临床研究,有足够的样本量和严格的方法来制定循证治疗指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信