Paxton Voigt, Emily Michelle Weidenbaum, Amanda Atkinson, Bailey Knight, Caroline McCaffrey, Jennifer K Blakemore
{"title":"Examining the fate of frozen embryo inventory: an analysis of patients' embryo disposition decisions.","authors":"Paxton Voigt, Emily Michelle Weidenbaum, Amanda Atkinson, Bailey Knight, Caroline McCaffrey, Jennifer K Blakemore","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03460-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine factors associated with embryo disposition decisions at a large academic fertility center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who made final embryo disposition (discard or donation to research) between January 1, 2020, and February 28, 2024, via electronic consent. Demographic and cycle-specific variables were collected via chart review. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analysis (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1280 patients, 900 (70.3%) discarded embryos and 380 (29.7%) donated to research. Patients who donated were more likely to have a diagnosis of recurrent pregnancy loss (6.1% vs 2.4%, p < 0.002). Patients who chose to donate had transferred more embryos (2 vs 1, p < 0.033) and had transferred more euploid embryos (44.7% vs 36.6%, p < 0.007). There was no difference in total number, number of euploids, or type of embryo disposed (p = 0.24, p = 0.96, p = 0.34). There was no difference observed among those who communicated with the center (p = 0.81) or those using donor gametes (egg p = 0.34, sperm p = 0.29). An additional analysis compared patients who achieved live birth (n = 902) to those who did not (n = 378), and those who donated were more likely to have achieved live birth (32.0% vs 24.1%, p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>At final embryo disposition, more patients discarded embryos than donated. Donators were more likely to have recurrent pregnancy loss as their reason for pursuing embryo creation, transfer more embryos across all cycles, and achieve a live birth. Discarders were more likely to have transferred untested or no embryos.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1845-1852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03460-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine factors associated with embryo disposition decisions at a large academic fertility center.
Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who made final embryo disposition (discard or donation to research) between January 1, 2020, and February 28, 2024, via electronic consent. Demographic and cycle-specific variables were collected via chart review. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analysis (p < 0.05).
Results: Of 1280 patients, 900 (70.3%) discarded embryos and 380 (29.7%) donated to research. Patients who donated were more likely to have a diagnosis of recurrent pregnancy loss (6.1% vs 2.4%, p < 0.002). Patients who chose to donate had transferred more embryos (2 vs 1, p < 0.033) and had transferred more euploid embryos (44.7% vs 36.6%, p < 0.007). There was no difference in total number, number of euploids, or type of embryo disposed (p = 0.24, p = 0.96, p = 0.34). There was no difference observed among those who communicated with the center (p = 0.81) or those using donor gametes (egg p = 0.34, sperm p = 0.29). An additional analysis compared patients who achieved live birth (n = 902) to those who did not (n = 378), and those who donated were more likely to have achieved live birth (32.0% vs 24.1%, p < 0.005).
Conclusion(s): At final embryo disposition, more patients discarded embryos than donated. Donators were more likely to have recurrent pregnancy loss as their reason for pursuing embryo creation, transfer more embryos across all cycles, and achieve a live birth. Discarders were more likely to have transferred untested or no embryos.
目的:确定与大型学术生育中心胚胎处置决定相关的因素。方法:我们对在2020年1月1日至2024年2月28日期间通过电子同意进行最终胚胎处置(丢弃或捐赠用于研究)的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。通过图表回顾收集人口统计和周期特定变量。资料分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验(p < 0.05)。结果:1280例患者中,弃置胚胎900例(70.3%),捐献胚胎380例(29.7%)。捐献的患者更有可能被诊断为复发性妊娠丢失(6.1% vs 2.4%, p < 0.002)。选择捐赠的患者移植了更多的胚胎(2 vs 1, p < 0.033),移植了更多的整倍体胚胎(44.7% vs 36.6%, p < 0.007)。两组间整倍体总数、整倍体数、胚胎类型均无差异(p = 0.24, p = 0.96, p = 0.34)。在与中心交流(p = 0.81)或使用供体配子(卵子p = 0.34,精子p = 0.29)的人群中,没有观察到差异。另一项分析比较了获得活产的患者(n = 902)和未获得活产的患者(n = 378),捐赠的患者更有可能获得活产(32.0% vs 24.1%, p < 0.005)。结论:在最终胚胎处置时,丢弃胚胎的患者多于捐赠胚胎的患者。捐赠者更有可能因为反复妊娠失败而追求胚胎创造,在所有周期内移植更多的胚胎,并实现活产。丢弃者更有可能转移未经测试或没有胚胎。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.