Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328
Annisa Ristya Rahmanti, Hsuan-Chia Yang, Chih-Wei Huang, Ching-Tzu Huang, Lutfan Lazuardi, Che-Wei Lin, Yu-Chuan Jack Li
{"title":"Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study.","authors":"Annisa Ristya Rahmanti, Hsuan-Chia Yang, Chih-Wei Huang, Ching-Tzu Huang, Lutfan Lazuardi, Che-Wei Lin, Yu-Chuan Jack Li","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonverbal communication is essential in physician-patient interaction, especially in telemedicine where verbal cues may be limited. This study aimed to identify and validate key nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine consultations through a Delphi method. A three-round Delphi study was conducted from June to November 2022, involving various experts, including academics, healthcare professionals, AI/telemedicine researchers, industry professionals, and patients. Experts evaluated the importance, validity, and reliability of potential nonverbal cues. Consensus was determined based on median responses and expert scoring percentages, with statistical agreement and stability assessed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 23.0 with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Of the 72 experts invited, 37 (51%) agreed to participate, with 35 completing the first round (95% completion rate). Eight significant nonverbal cues were identified in the first round, though one did not reach consensus. The second round obtained an 89% response rate (31/35), with three new cues introduced; one did not reach consensus. Round 3 achieved a 94% response rate (29/31), finalizing nine key cues: facial expression, eye contact, tone of voice, smiling, head nodding, body posture, hand gesture, distance, and environmental cues. Among these, facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice were identified as the most crucial. Inter-expert agreement was statistically significant across all items with strong agreement on the importance (W = 0.739, <i>p</i> < 0.001), good agreement on their validity (W = 0.689, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and moderate agreement on their reliability (W = 0.452, <i>p</i> < 0.001). This study highlights the importance of specific nonverbal cues in telemedicine, particularly facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice. It provides a validated foundation for developing tools to enhance physician-patient interactions and potentially improve health outcomes in telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2497328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonverbal communication is essential in physician-patient interaction, especially in telemedicine where verbal cues may be limited. This study aimed to identify and validate key nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine consultations through a Delphi method. A three-round Delphi study was conducted from June to November 2022, involving various experts, including academics, healthcare professionals, AI/telemedicine researchers, industry professionals, and patients. Experts evaluated the importance, validity, and reliability of potential nonverbal cues. Consensus was determined based on median responses and expert scoring percentages, with statistical agreement and stability assessed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 23.0 with significance set at p < 0.05. Of the 72 experts invited, 37 (51%) agreed to participate, with 35 completing the first round (95% completion rate). Eight significant nonverbal cues were identified in the first round, though one did not reach consensus. The second round obtained an 89% response rate (31/35), with three new cues introduced; one did not reach consensus. Round 3 achieved a 94% response rate (29/31), finalizing nine key cues: facial expression, eye contact, tone of voice, smiling, head nodding, body posture, hand gesture, distance, and environmental cues. Among these, facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice were identified as the most crucial. Inter-expert agreement was statistically significant across all items with strong agreement on the importance (W = 0.739, p < 0.001), good agreement on their validity (W = 0.689, p < 0.001), and moderate agreement on their reliability (W = 0.452, p < 0.001). This study highlights the importance of specific nonverbal cues in telemedicine, particularly facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice. It provides a validated foundation for developing tools to enhance physician-patient interactions and potentially improve health outcomes in telemedicine.

Abstract Image

验证非语言线索评估医生移情在远程医疗:德尔菲研究。
非语言交流在医患互动中是必不可少的,特别是在远程医疗中,语言提示可能有限。本研究旨在通过德尔菲法识别和验证远程医疗会诊中评估医生移情的关键非语言线索。2022年6月至11月进行了三轮德尔菲研究,涉及学者、医疗保健专业人员、人工智能/远程医疗研究人员、行业专业人员和患者等各种专家。专家们评估了潜在的非语言线索的重要性、有效性和可靠性。共识是根据中位反应和专家评分百分比确定的,统计一致性和稳定性评估使用肯德尔的一致性系数(肯德尔的W)和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。采用SPSS 23.0进行分析,显著性设置为p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信