A retrospective review of psychosocial correlates of chronic pain in cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse youth receiving evaluation in interdisciplinary pediatric pain clinics.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Crystal Tracy, Mary Lynch Milder, Lindsey Vater, Ann Lagges, Kathleen Lemanek, Sharon Wrona, Elaine Gilbert, Adam T Hirsh, Megan M Miller, Kelly Donahue, Morgan Streicher, Amy E Williams
{"title":"A retrospective review of psychosocial correlates of chronic pain in cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse youth receiving evaluation in interdisciplinary pediatric pain clinics.","authors":"Crystal Tracy, Mary Lynch Milder, Lindsey Vater, Ann Lagges, Kathleen Lemanek, Sharon Wrona, Elaine Gilbert, Adam T Hirsh, Megan M Miller, Kelly Donahue, Morgan Streicher, Amy E Williams","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2477466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals who experience social marginalization, such as transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth, have increased risk for poor health outcomes, including chronic pain. A better understanding of the impact of chronic pain in these populations would improve treatment and aid in reducing health care disparities. Our retrospective review of clinical data examined psychosocial correlates of pain in TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aim was to explore differences in psychosocial variables between TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain. In alignment with the minority stress model, we hypothesized worse pain and pain-related disability, poorer quality of life, and more internalizing symptoms in TGD patients. The secondary aim was to explore associations among psychosocial variables in TGD and cisgender youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 140 youth (48 TGD, 92 cisgender) evaluated in pediatric pain clinics. Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests examined group differences in pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and internalizing symptoms. Bivariate correlations were conducted for each group, and differences in the strength of correlations were evaluated using Fisher <i>r</i>-to-<i>z</i>. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for all study procedures at each participating institution prior to extraction of retrospective clinical data (Indiana 240 University IRB Protocol No. 12506, The Ohio State University College of Medicine IRB Protocol No. 16-00937). Informed consent was not required or obtained due to the retrospective nature of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cisgender patients reported worse pain intensity, whereas TGD patients reported lower quality of life and more internalizing symptoms. In the combined sample, pain intensity was correlated with worse functional disability, poorer quality of life, and more catastrophic thinking. No group differences in the strength of correlations were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that for TGD youth with chronic pain, internalizing symptoms and quality of life are important targets for treatment and improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"8 2","pages":"2477466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2477466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals who experience social marginalization, such as transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth, have increased risk for poor health outcomes, including chronic pain. A better understanding of the impact of chronic pain in these populations would improve treatment and aid in reducing health care disparities. Our retrospective review of clinical data examined psychosocial correlates of pain in TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain.

Aims: The study aim was to explore differences in psychosocial variables between TGD and cisgender youth with chronic pain. In alignment with the minority stress model, we hypothesized worse pain and pain-related disability, poorer quality of life, and more internalizing symptoms in TGD patients. The secondary aim was to explore associations among psychosocial variables in TGD and cisgender youth.

Methods: Data were collected from 140 youth (48 TGD, 92 cisgender) evaluated in pediatric pain clinics. Independent samples t-tests examined group differences in pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and internalizing symptoms. Bivariate correlations were conducted for each group, and differences in the strength of correlations were evaluated using Fisher r-to-z. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained for all study procedures at each participating institution prior to extraction of retrospective clinical data (Indiana 240 University IRB Protocol No. 12506, The Ohio State University College of Medicine IRB Protocol No. 16-00937). Informed consent was not required or obtained due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Results: Cisgender patients reported worse pain intensity, whereas TGD patients reported lower quality of life and more internalizing symptoms. In the combined sample, pain intensity was correlated with worse functional disability, poorer quality of life, and more catastrophic thinking. No group differences in the strength of correlations were found.

Conclusions: Results suggest that for TGD youth with chronic pain, internalizing symptoms and quality of life are important targets for treatment and improvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在跨学科儿科疼痛诊所接受评估的顺性别、跨性别和性别多样化青少年慢性疼痛的社会心理相关因素的回顾性回顾。
背景:经历社会边缘化的个人,如跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)青年,健康状况不佳的风险增加,包括慢性疼痛。更好地了解慢性疼痛对这些人群的影响将改善治疗并有助于减少保健差距。我们对临床资料进行回顾性回顾,检查TGD和顺性别青年慢性疼痛的心理社会相关因素。目的:研究目的是探讨TGD与顺性别青年慢性疼痛患者在心理社会变量上的差异。与少数民族压力模型一致,我们假设TGD患者有更严重的疼痛和疼痛相关的残疾,更差的生活质量和更多的内化症状。第二个目的是探索TGD和顺性别青年的社会心理变量之间的联系。方法:收集140名在儿科疼痛门诊接受评估的青少年(48名TGD, 92名顺性别)的数据。独立样本t检验检验了疼痛强度、功能残疾、生活质量、疼痛灾难化和内化症状的组间差异。对每组进行双变量相关性,并使用Fisher r-to-z评估相关性强度的差异。在提取回顾性临床数据之前,每个参与机构的所有研究程序都获得了机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准(印第安纳240大学IRB协议第12506号,俄亥俄州立大学医学院IRB协议第16-00937号)。由于研究是回顾性的,因此不需要知情同意。结果:顺性别患者报告更严重的疼痛强度,而TGD患者报告更低的生活质量和更多的内化症状。在综合样本中,疼痛强度与更严重的功能残疾、更差的生活质量和更灾难性的想法相关。没有发现相关强度的组间差异。结论:结果提示,对于伴有慢性疼痛的TGD青年,内化症状和生活质量是治疗和改善的重要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信