Differences in virulence and drug resistance between Clostridioides difficile ST37 and ST1 isolates.

IF 5.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Virulence Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1080/21505594.2025.2502554
Zirou Ouyang, Jing Yang, Huimin Zhang, Min Zhao, Huimin Yang, Jiafeng Zhao, Yaxuan Yang, Cuixin Qiang, Zhirong Li, Pu Qin, Weigang Wang, Yanan Niu, Jianhong Zhao
{"title":"Differences in virulence and drug resistance between <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> ST37 and ST1 isolates.","authors":"Zirou Ouyang, Jing Yang, Huimin Zhang, Min Zhao, Huimin Yang, Jiafeng Zhao, Yaxuan Yang, Cuixin Qiang, Zhirong Li, Pu Qin, Weigang Wang, Yanan Niu, Jianhong Zhao","doi":"10.1080/21505594.2025.2502554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most common hospital-acquired infections is caused by toxigenic Clostridioides difficile. Although C. difficile ST37 only produces a functional toxin B, it causes disease as severe as that caused by hypervirulent ST1. We aim to compare the differences in virulence and drug resistance between ST37 and ST1 isolates. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on ST37 and ST1 isolates, analyzing their type-specific genes, and the distribution and mutation of genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance. We compared the in vitro virulence-related phenotypes of ST37 and ST1 isolates, including: TcdB concentration, number of spores formed, aggregation rate, biofilm formation, swimming diameter in semi-solid medium, motility diameter on the surface of solid medium, and their resistance to 14 CDI-related antibiotics. We detected 4 ST37-specific genes related to adherence, including lytC, cbpA, CD3246, and srtB. We detected 97 virulence-related genes in ST37 isolates that exhibit genomic differences compared to ST1. ST37 isolates showed increased aggregation, biofilm formation, and surface motility compared to ST1 in vitro. Chloramphenicol resistance gene catQ and tetracycline resistance gene tetM are present in ST37 but absent in ST1 strains. The resistance rates of ST37 to chloramphenicol and tetracycline were 45.4% and 81.8%, respectively, whereas ST1 isolates were sensitive to both antibiotics. ST1 was more resistant to rifaximin than ST37. ST37 isolates showed stronger aggregation, biofilm formation and surface motility, and had higher resistance rates to chloramphenicol and tetracycline. ST1 isolates showed stronger ability to produce toxin and sporulation, and was highly resistant to rifaximin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23747,"journal":{"name":"Virulence","volume":"16 1","pages":"2502554"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virulence","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2025.2502554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most common hospital-acquired infections is caused by toxigenic Clostridioides difficile. Although C. difficile ST37 only produces a functional toxin B, it causes disease as severe as that caused by hypervirulent ST1. We aim to compare the differences in virulence and drug resistance between ST37 and ST1 isolates. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on ST37 and ST1 isolates, analyzing their type-specific genes, and the distribution and mutation of genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance. We compared the in vitro virulence-related phenotypes of ST37 and ST1 isolates, including: TcdB concentration, number of spores formed, aggregation rate, biofilm formation, swimming diameter in semi-solid medium, motility diameter on the surface of solid medium, and their resistance to 14 CDI-related antibiotics. We detected 4 ST37-specific genes related to adherence, including lytC, cbpA, CD3246, and srtB. We detected 97 virulence-related genes in ST37 isolates that exhibit genomic differences compared to ST1. ST37 isolates showed increased aggregation, biofilm formation, and surface motility compared to ST1 in vitro. Chloramphenicol resistance gene catQ and tetracycline resistance gene tetM are present in ST37 but absent in ST1 strains. The resistance rates of ST37 to chloramphenicol and tetracycline were 45.4% and 81.8%, respectively, whereas ST1 isolates were sensitive to both antibiotics. ST1 was more resistant to rifaximin than ST37. ST37 isolates showed stronger aggregation, biofilm formation and surface motility, and had higher resistance rates to chloramphenicol and tetracycline. ST1 isolates showed stronger ability to produce toxin and sporulation, and was highly resistant to rifaximin.

艰难梭菌ST37和ST1菌株的毒力和耐药性差异。
最常见的医院获得性感染之一是由产毒艰难梭菌引起的。虽然艰难梭菌ST37只产生一种功能性毒素B,但它引起的疾病与高毒性ST1引起的疾病一样严重。我们的目的是比较ST37和ST1菌株在毒力和耐药性方面的差异。我们对ST37和ST1分离株进行了全基因组测序,分析了它们的型特异性基因,以及与毒力和抗生素耐药性相关的基因分布和突变。我们比较了ST37和ST1菌株的体外毒力相关表型,包括:TcdB浓度、孢子形成数、聚集率、生物膜形成、半固体介质游动直径、固体介质表面运动直径以及对14种cdi相关抗生素的耐药性。我们检测到4个与st37粘附相关的特异性基因,包括lytC、cbpA、CD3246和srtB。我们在ST37分离株中检测到97个毒力相关基因,与ST1相比表现出基因组差异。与体外ST1相比,ST37分离物表现出更高的聚集性、生物膜形成和表面运动性。在ST37株中存在氯霉素耐药基因catQ和四环素耐药基因tetM,而在ST1株中不存在。ST37菌株对氯霉素和四环素的耐药率分别为45.4%和81.8%,而ST1菌株对这两种抗生素均敏感。ST1对利福昔明的耐药程度高于ST37。ST37菌株具有较强的聚集性、生物膜形成性和表面运动性,对氯霉素和四环素的耐药率较高。ST1菌株表现出较强的产毒和产孢能力,对利福昔明具有高度耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virulence
Virulence IMMUNOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Virulence is a fully open access peer-reviewed journal. All articles will (if accepted) be available for anyone to read anywhere, at any time immediately on publication. Virulence is the first international peer-reviewed journal of its kind to focus exclusively on microbial pathogenicity, the infection process and host-pathogen interactions. To address the new infectious challenges, emerging infectious agents and antimicrobial resistance, there is a clear need for interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信