Patient Outcomes in Mandibular Distraction Based on Timing of Feeding Initiation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jacob Boyd, Nicole Wershoven, Alex Kaizer, Caitlin Blades, Greg Allen, Christopher Discolo, Christian Francom
{"title":"Patient Outcomes in Mandibular Distraction Based on Timing of Feeding Initiation.","authors":"Jacob Boyd, Nicole Wershoven, Alex Kaizer, Caitlin Blades, Greg Allen, Christopher Discolo, Christian Francom","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the feeding outcomes between patients who underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery; one subset received feeding throughout the distraction period, whereas the other subset was not fed until after distraction completion. The objective is to assess whether initiating feeding during the distraction phase can lead to enhanced postoperative care for patients with airway obstruction secondary to micrognathia or Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review (2000-2024).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected in the REDCap database. Demographics and clinical outcomes were reported with frequency (percent) and mean (standard deviation) for categorical and continuous measures, respectively. Linear regression models were fit to compare groups for continuous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three patients who underwent MDO for micrognathia at the Children's Hospital of Colorado from 2000 to 2024. For patients who started feeding during distraction, they reached full feeds on average 1.4 days after distraction was complete as compared to 12.8 days for those patients who initiated feeding after distraction was complete (P = .027). In total, 42% of patients who started feeding after distraction was completed achieved full feeds, compared to 72% who started during (P = .01). Patients who were fed after distraction, whether or not they achieved full oral feeds before discharge, had on average a 15-day longer hospital stay than those patients who were fed during distraction (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that initiating feeding while undergoing distraction could result in quicker achievement of full feeds and earlier discharge from the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the feeding outcomes between patients who underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery; one subset received feeding throughout the distraction period, whereas the other subset was not fed until after distraction completion. The objective is to assess whether initiating feeding during the distraction phase can lead to enhanced postoperative care for patients with airway obstruction secondary to micrognathia or Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).

Study design: Retrospective chart review (2000-2024).

Setting: Single academic institution.

Methods: Data were collected in the REDCap database. Demographics and clinical outcomes were reported with frequency (percent) and mean (standard deviation) for categorical and continuous measures, respectively. Linear regression models were fit to compare groups for continuous outcomes.

Results: Eighty-three patients who underwent MDO for micrognathia at the Children's Hospital of Colorado from 2000 to 2024. For patients who started feeding during distraction, they reached full feeds on average 1.4 days after distraction was complete as compared to 12.8 days for those patients who initiated feeding after distraction was complete (P = .027). In total, 42% of patients who started feeding after distraction was completed achieved full feeds, compared to 72% who started during (P = .01). Patients who were fed after distraction, whether or not they achieved full oral feeds before discharge, had on average a 15-day longer hospital stay than those patients who were fed during distraction (P < .01).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that initiating feeding while undergoing distraction could result in quicker achievement of full feeds and earlier discharge from the hospital.

基于开始进食时间的下颌牵张患者预后。
目的:本研究的目的是比较下颌骨牵张成骨术(MDO)患者的喂养结果;其中一组在整个分散过程中接受喂食,而另一组直到分散完成后才接受喂食。目的是评估在牵张期开始喂养是否可以提高小颌畸形或皮埃尔罗宾序列(PRS)继发气道阻塞患者的术后护理。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾(2000-2024)。设置:单一学术机构。方法:数据来源于REDCap数据库。统计数据和临床结果分别以分类测量和连续测量的频率(百分比)和平均值(标准差)报告。采用线性回归模型对连续结果进行组间比较。结果:2000年至2024年在科罗拉多州儿童医院接受MDO治疗小颌畸形的83例患者。对于在分心期间开始进食的患者,他们在分心完成后平均1.4天达到完全进食,而在分心完成后开始进食的患者为12.8天(P = 0.027)。总的来说,42%的患者在分心后开始进食,而72%的患者在分心后开始进食(P = 0.01)。在分神后喂食的患者,无论他们在出院前是否实现了完整的口服喂养,平均住院时间比在分神时喂食的患者长15天(P结论:我们的研究结果表明,在分神时开始喂食可以更快地实现完全喂养和更早地出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信