Cadaveric evaluation of bronchial blockade using the Coda vascular catheter placed under Borescope guidance.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Adrien Aertsens, Megan Macrae, Jean-Sebastien Palerme
{"title":"Cadaveric evaluation of bronchial blockade using the Coda vascular catheter placed under Borescope guidance.","authors":"Adrien Aertsens, Megan Macrae, Jean-Sebastien Palerme","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of achieving bronchial blockade using a vascular balloon catheter under low-cost semi-flexible borescope guidance in dogs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cadaveric pilot study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Canine cadavers (n = 7) weighing between 12.2 and 63 kg.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two participants attempted four different techniques to achieve bronchus blockade using a 10 Fr Coda catheter or an EZ-blocker (EZ) under borescopic (B) or endoscopic (E) guidance. Placement success was confirmed via thoracoscopy. Success rate, procedure duration, and reasons of failure were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>B-Coda catheter placement was possible on dogs intubated with a minimum 8.5 mm size endotracheal tube (ETT). E-EZ was unsuccessful with an 8.5 ETT and below and on some dogs bigger than 30 kg. Excluding the failures due to size limitations of the devices, success rate during first attempt for the left side was 50% for B-EZ and 75% for all other techniques. Right-sided success was 50% for B-EZ, 33% for B-Coda, 66% for E-EZ and 62% for E-Coda. Malpositioning of the devices occurred twice as commonly under borescopic guidance. The techniques were all successful after up to two additional attempts. Time to achieve blockade was faster using endoscopic guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The catheter allowed bronchial occlusion in larger canine cadavers. The borescope allowed guidance without the size limitation of the endoscope.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The Coda catheter had no size limitation in comparison to the EZ blocker and could be analternative to it. A sterilized borescope may be an option when bronchoscope size is inappropriate for a patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of achieving bronchial blockade using a vascular balloon catheter under low-cost semi-flexible borescope guidance in dogs.

Study design: Cadaveric pilot study.

Sample population: Canine cadavers (n = 7) weighing between 12.2 and 63 kg.

Methods: Two participants attempted four different techniques to achieve bronchus blockade using a 10 Fr Coda catheter or an EZ-blocker (EZ) under borescopic (B) or endoscopic (E) guidance. Placement success was confirmed via thoracoscopy. Success rate, procedure duration, and reasons of failure were recorded.

Results: B-Coda catheter placement was possible on dogs intubated with a minimum 8.5 mm size endotracheal tube (ETT). E-EZ was unsuccessful with an 8.5 ETT and below and on some dogs bigger than 30 kg. Excluding the failures due to size limitations of the devices, success rate during first attempt for the left side was 50% for B-EZ and 75% for all other techniques. Right-sided success was 50% for B-EZ, 33% for B-Coda, 66% for E-EZ and 62% for E-Coda. Malpositioning of the devices occurred twice as commonly under borescopic guidance. The techniques were all successful after up to two additional attempts. Time to achieve blockade was faster using endoscopic guidance.

Conclusion: The catheter allowed bronchial occlusion in larger canine cadavers. The borescope allowed guidance without the size limitation of the endoscope.

Clinical relevance: The Coda catheter had no size limitation in comparison to the EZ blocker and could be analternative to it. A sterilized borescope may be an option when bronchoscope size is inappropriate for a patient.

Coda血管导管在内窥镜引导下对支气管阻滞的尸体评价。
目的:探讨低成本半柔性气管镜引导下血管球囊导管实现犬支气管阻滞的可行性。研究设计:尸体初步研究。样本群体:体重在12.2至63公斤之间的犬类尸体(n = 7)。方法:两名参与者在内镜(B)或内镜(E)引导下使用10 Fr Coda导管或EZ-阻滞剂(EZ)尝试四种不同的技术来实现支气管阻断。通过胸腔镜检查确认放置成功。记录手术成功率、手术持续时间和失败原因。结果:B-Coda导管放置在最小8.5 mm气管内管(ETT)的狗身上是可能的。E-EZ对于8.5及以下的ETT和一些大于30公斤的狗是不成功的。排除由于设备尺寸限制导致的失败,B-EZ在左侧第一次尝试的成功率为50%,所有其他技术的成功率为75%。B-EZ右侧成功率为50%,B-Coda为33%,E-EZ为66%,E-Coda为62%。在内窥镜引导下,器械的错位发生率是正常情况下的两倍。经过两次额外的尝试,这些技术都成功了。内窥镜引导达到阻断的时间更快。结论:该导管可用于较大犬尸体的支气管闭塞。内窥镜不受内窥镜的尺寸限制,可以引导。临床意义:与EZ阻滞剂相比,Coda导管没有尺寸限制,可以替代EZ阻滞剂。当支气管镜的大小不适合患者时,消毒的气管镜可能是一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信