Injectate distribution patterns with the posterior infrazygomatic and transoral approaches to the pterygopalatine fossa.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anže Jerman, Luka Pušnik, Erika Cvetko, Nejc Umek, Žiga Snoj
{"title":"Injectate distribution patterns with the posterior infrazygomatic and transoral approaches to the pterygopalatine fossa.","authors":"Anže Jerman, Luka Pušnik, Erika Cvetko, Nejc Umek, Žiga Snoj","doi":"10.4097/kja.24907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injectate distribution patterns in the pterygopalatine fossa may differ based on the drug administration approach used. This study primarily aimed to assess and compare injectate distribution following the posterior infrazygomatic and transoral approaches. The secondary aim was to evaluate the safety of both approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Injectate distribution patterns were evaluated in 13 cadaveric head specimens. The vessels were perfused with a gelatin-based solution containing an iodinated contrast agent. The ultrasound-guided posterior infrazygomatic approach and transoral approach were performed on contralateral sides, and needle placement was confirmed using computed tomography (CT). A methylene blue and iodinated contrast agent solution was administered following successful needle placement. Injectate distribution and injuries were assessed via CT and anatomical dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the posterior infrazygomatic approach, methylene blue consistently stained the maxillary artery and nerve, sphenopalatine ganglion, and lateral pterygoid muscle, whereas with the transoral approach, it most frequently surrounded the maxillary artery and structures within the greater palatine canal. The iodinated contrast agent was distributed predominantly along the needle trajectories for both approaches. Injuries to the maxillary artery and facial nerve were documented following the posterior infrazygomatic approach, whereas an injury to the lateral pterygoid plate was observed following the transoral approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the posterior infrazygomatic approach, contrast agent encompassed the entire pterygopalatine fossa, whereas the transoral approach yielded a more localized distribution, primarily within the inferior portion and greater palatine canal. These differences in distribution patterns should guide the selection of the most appropriate approach based on the specific clinical indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Injectate distribution patterns in the pterygopalatine fossa may differ based on the drug administration approach used. This study primarily aimed to assess and compare injectate distribution following the posterior infrazygomatic and transoral approaches. The secondary aim was to evaluate the safety of both approaches.

Methods: Injectate distribution patterns were evaluated in 13 cadaveric head specimens. The vessels were perfused with a gelatin-based solution containing an iodinated contrast agent. The ultrasound-guided posterior infrazygomatic approach and transoral approach were performed on contralateral sides, and needle placement was confirmed using computed tomography (CT). A methylene blue and iodinated contrast agent solution was administered following successful needle placement. Injectate distribution and injuries were assessed via CT and anatomical dissection.

Results: With the posterior infrazygomatic approach, methylene blue consistently stained the maxillary artery and nerve, sphenopalatine ganglion, and lateral pterygoid muscle, whereas with the transoral approach, it most frequently surrounded the maxillary artery and structures within the greater palatine canal. The iodinated contrast agent was distributed predominantly along the needle trajectories for both approaches. Injuries to the maxillary artery and facial nerve were documented following the posterior infrazygomatic approach, whereas an injury to the lateral pterygoid plate was observed following the transoral approach.

Conclusions: With the posterior infrazygomatic approach, contrast agent encompassed the entire pterygopalatine fossa, whereas the transoral approach yielded a more localized distribution, primarily within the inferior portion and greater palatine canal. These differences in distribution patterns should guide the selection of the most appropriate approach based on the specific clinical indication.

通过颧下后路和经口入路注入到翼腭窝。
背景:翼腭窝的注射分布模式可能因药物给药方式的不同而不同。本研究的主要目的是评估和比较后颧下入路和经口入路的注射分布。第二个目的是评估两种方法的安全性。方法:对13例尸体头部标本进行了注射分布模式的评价。血管灌注含有碘化造影剂的明胶基溶液。对侧行超声引导下颧下后入路和经口入路,CT确认置针位置。在针头放置成功后,给予亚甲基蓝和碘化造影剂溶液。通过CT和解剖解剖评估静脉分布和损伤情况。结果:颧下后入路亚甲基蓝对上颌动脉、神经、蝶腭神经节和翼状外侧肌的染色一致,而经口入路亚甲基蓝对上颌动脉和腭大管内结构的染色最多。碘化造影剂主要沿两种入路的针迹分布。上颌动脉和面神经损伤是在颧下后入路后发现的,而翼状突外侧板损伤是在经口入路后发现的。结论:颧下后入路造影剂可覆盖整个翼腭窝,而经口入路造影剂分布更局限,主要分布在下腭管和腭大管内。这些分布模式的差异应该指导根据具体的临床适应症选择最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信