Pharmacist interventions to improve medication adherence in patients with co-morbid hypertension and diabetes: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adwoa Oforiwaa Kwakye, Mahmood Brobbey Oppong, Irene Akwo Kretchy
{"title":"Pharmacist interventions to improve medication adherence in patients with co-morbid hypertension and diabetes: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Adwoa Oforiwaa Kwakye, Mahmood Brobbey Oppong, Irene Akwo Kretchy","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the characteristics, assessment methods and overall impact of pharmacist-led interventions on medication adherence (MA) and clinical outcomes in patients with co-morbid hypertension and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A predetermined search in four scientific databases (Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and CINAHL) and a search engine (Google Scholar) was conducted between October 2023 and February 2024. This review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A screening was conducted which considered the article type (original article), written in the English language and based on the study's relevance while conference proceedings, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. Bibliometric indicators and VOSviewer were utilized to analyse and visualize keyword networks.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Out of the 420 studies initially identified, 12 of them involving 3512 patients were analysed in this review. The majority (11) reported a significant effect of pharmacist interventions on MA to prescribe medications. Pharmacist-led interventions, including remote and in-person education, special monitoring, and medication simplification, significantly improved MA and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes. The inclusion of patient education in a pharmacist-led multimodal intervention achieved a 100% success rate in improving MA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with hypertension and diabetes co-morbidity, integrating pharmacist education in multifaceted interventions is more effective in improving MA and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":"33 2","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the characteristics, assessment methods and overall impact of pharmacist-led interventions on medication adherence (MA) and clinical outcomes in patients with co-morbid hypertension and diabetes.

Methods: A predetermined search in four scientific databases (Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and CINAHL) and a search engine (Google Scholar) was conducted between October 2023 and February 2024. This review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A screening was conducted which considered the article type (original article), written in the English language and based on the study's relevance while conference proceedings, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. Bibliometric indicators and VOSviewer were utilized to analyse and visualize keyword networks.

Key findings: Out of the 420 studies initially identified, 12 of them involving 3512 patients were analysed in this review. The majority (11) reported a significant effect of pharmacist interventions on MA to prescribe medications. Pharmacist-led interventions, including remote and in-person education, special monitoring, and medication simplification, significantly improved MA and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes. The inclusion of patient education in a pharmacist-led multimodal intervention achieved a 100% success rate in improving MA.

Conclusion: For patients with hypertension and diabetes co-morbidity, integrating pharmacist education in multifaceted interventions is more effective in improving MA and clinical outcomes.

药师干预提高合并高血压和糖尿病患者的药物依从性:范围回顾和文献计量学分析。
目的:评价药师主导的干预措施对高血压合并糖尿病患者服药依从性和临床结局的特点、评估方法及总体影响。方法:于2023年10月至2024年2月在Scopus、Cochrane、Medline和CINAHL四个科学数据库和一个搜索引擎(谷歌Scholar)中进行预定检索。本综述使用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报道。筛选考虑了文章类型(原文),以英语写作,并基于研究的相关性,排除了会议记录、综述和荟萃分析。利用文献计量指标和VOSviewer对关键词网络进行分析和可视化。主要发现:在最初确定的420项研究中,本综述分析了其中12项涉及3512名患者的研究。大多数(11)报告了药师干预对MA处方药物的显著影响。药师主导的干预措施,包括远程和面对面教育、特殊监测和药物简化,显著改善了高血压和糖尿病患者的MA和临床结果。在药剂师主导的多模式干预中纳入患者教育在改善MA方面取得了100%的成功率。结论:对高血压糖尿病合并症患者,将药师教育纳入多方面干预措施更能有效地改善高血压和糖尿病的临床预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信