Quadratus lumborum block for total abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5978
Nada Pejcic, Marija Kutlesic, Ivan Velickovic, Vladimir Milic, Slavisa Kovacevic, Radmilo J Jankovic, Dejan Mitic, Radomir Mitic, Nenad Zornic
{"title":"Quadratus lumborum block for total abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.","authors":"Nada Pejcic, Marija Kutlesic, Ivan Velickovic, Vladimir Milic, Slavisa Kovacevic, Radmilo J Jankovic, Dejan Mitic, Radomir Mitic, Nenad Zornic","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an interfascial block recommended for multimodal pain therapy after cesarean section in patients who cannot receive intrathecal morphine. We wanted to investigate whether QLB contributes to better analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). The study was registered on the website ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT05765318).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for TAH were randomized into two groups of 30 members each. The treatment group received QLB, while the control group did not undergo any block. The primary outcome was the amount of morphine during the first 12 postoperative h. Secondary outcomes included the total amount of morphine for 24 h, time to the first request for additional analgesia, pain intensity at rest and during activity, frequency of nausea and vomiting, and the degree of sedation at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the QLB group received significantly less morphine (4.13 mg) compared to the control group (9.73 mg) during the first 12 postoperative h (p < 0.001) and also during the first 24 h. The patients in the QLB group had longer time interval to the first breakthrough pain (7.87 h) compared to the control group (2.63 h) (p < 0.001), lower NRS scores at rest and during activity after 2, 12, and 24 h, and better satisfaction with provided pain relief during the first 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QLB reduces postoperative morphine use and postoperative pain intensity on the NRS scale, both at rest and during activity, as part of multimodal pain therapy for TAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 2","pages":"349-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an interfascial block recommended for multimodal pain therapy after cesarean section in patients who cannot receive intrathecal morphine. We wanted to investigate whether QLB contributes to better analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). The study was registered on the website ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT05765318).

Materials and methods: Patients scheduled for TAH were randomized into two groups of 30 members each. The treatment group received QLB, while the control group did not undergo any block. The primary outcome was the amount of morphine during the first 12 postoperative h. Secondary outcomes included the total amount of morphine for 24 h, time to the first request for additional analgesia, pain intensity at rest and during activity, frequency of nausea and vomiting, and the degree of sedation at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: Patients in the QLB group received significantly less morphine (4.13 mg) compared to the control group (9.73 mg) during the first 12 postoperative h (p < 0.001) and also during the first 24 h. The patients in the QLB group had longer time interval to the first breakthrough pain (7.87 h) compared to the control group (2.63 h) (p < 0.001), lower NRS scores at rest and during activity after 2, 12, and 24 h, and better satisfaction with provided pain relief during the first 24 h postoperatively.

Conclusion: QLB reduces postoperative morphine use and postoperative pain intensity on the NRS scale, both at rest and during activity, as part of multimodal pain therapy for TAH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰方肌阻滞用于全腹子宫切除术:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。
背景/目的:腰方肌阻滞(QLB)是一种推荐用于剖宫产术后不能接受鞘内吗啡的患者的多模式疼痛治疗的筋膜间阻滞。我们想研究QLB是否有助于全腹子宫切除术(TAH)后更好的镇痛。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov网站注册(注册号NCT05765318)。材料与方法:将计划行TAH的患者随机分为两组,每组30人。治疗组给予QLB,对照组不进行阻滞。主要结局是术后前12小时吗啡的用量。次要结局包括术后24小时吗啡的总用量、第一次要求额外镇痛的时间、休息和活动时的疼痛强度、恶心和呕吐的频率以及术后2、6、12和24小时的镇静程度。结果:患者QLB组显著减少吗啡(4.13毫克),而对照组(9.73毫克)在第一次术后12 h (p < 0.001),也在第一个24小时。QLB组患者较长时间间隔第一个突破痛苦(7.87小时)相比,对照组(2.63小时)(p < 0.001),低NRS评分在休息和活动2后,12日和24 h,和更好的满意度在术后24 h提供缓解疼痛。结论:QLB作为多模式疼痛治疗TAH的一部分,可以减少术后吗啡的使用和术后NRS疼痛强度,无论是在休息时还是在活动时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信