Associations Between Quantitative Lung Ultrasound and Successful Extubation in Infants.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Yan-Mei Xie, Cai-Man Yan, Xiang Zhao, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Jian-Ru Peng, Xiao-Mei Liu, Li Huang, Hai-Ran Ma
{"title":"Associations Between Quantitative Lung Ultrasound and Successful Extubation in Infants.","authors":"Yan-Mei Xie, Cai-Man Yan, Xiang Zhao, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Jian-Ru Peng, Xiao-Mei Liu, Li Huang, Hai-Ran Ma","doi":"10.1002/jum.16715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim is to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the weaning of neonates from ventilators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included hospitalized neonates who underwent invasive ventilation (excluding neonates ineligible for enrollment, eg, neonates with nonrespiratory conditions requiring mechanical ventilation). All the included neonates underwent LUS using a palm-sized ultrasound machine. After extubation, the neonates were divided into success and failure groups. Additionally, the neonates were divided into 2 groups according to gestational age (GA, <28 weeks and ≥28 weeks). Data on the main LUS signs and scores half an hour before and 2 hours after extubation were collected, and ultrasound scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When LUS scores before and after extubation were used to predict weaning failure, the sensitivities were 83.3 and 94.6% (95% CI, 0.823-0.986; P < .05), and the specificities were 83.3 and 97.3% (95% CI, 0.819-0.995; P < .05), respectively. After grouping, for the <28-week group, the sensitivity was 84.6% both before and after extubation, and the specificities were 77.8 and 88.9%, respectively (before extubation: 95% CI, 0.653-1.013; P < .001; after extubation: 95% CI, 0.652-1.023; P < .001). In the ≥28-week group, the sensitivity was 80.0% both before and after extubation, and the specificities were 96.9 and 98.5%, respectively (before extubation: 95% CI, 0.724-1.051; P < .001; after extubation: 95% CI, 0.777-1.051; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS can predict weaning failure in neonates with different respiratory diseases on the basis of LUS scores, with or without differences in GA. The use of palm-sized handheld portable ultrasound machines for LUS is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the weaning of neonates from ventilators.

Methods: This prospective observational study included hospitalized neonates who underwent invasive ventilation (excluding neonates ineligible for enrollment, eg, neonates with nonrespiratory conditions requiring mechanical ventilation). All the included neonates underwent LUS using a palm-sized ultrasound machine. After extubation, the neonates were divided into success and failure groups. Additionally, the neonates were divided into 2 groups according to gestational age (GA, <28 weeks and ≥28 weeks). Data on the main LUS signs and scores half an hour before and 2 hours after extubation were collected, and ultrasound scores were compared.

Results: When LUS scores before and after extubation were used to predict weaning failure, the sensitivities were 83.3 and 94.6% (95% CI, 0.823-0.986; P < .05), and the specificities were 83.3 and 97.3% (95% CI, 0.819-0.995; P < .05), respectively. After grouping, for the <28-week group, the sensitivity was 84.6% both before and after extubation, and the specificities were 77.8 and 88.9%, respectively (before extubation: 95% CI, 0.653-1.013; P < .001; after extubation: 95% CI, 0.652-1.023; P < .001). In the ≥28-week group, the sensitivity was 80.0% both before and after extubation, and the specificities were 96.9 and 98.5%, respectively (before extubation: 95% CI, 0.724-1.051; P < .001; after extubation: 95% CI, 0.777-1.051; P < .001).

Conclusions: LUS can predict weaning failure in neonates with different respiratory diseases on the basis of LUS scores, with or without differences in GA. The use of palm-sized handheld portable ultrasound machines for LUS is feasible.

定量肺超声与婴儿成功拔管的关系。
目的:评价肺超声(LUS)在新生儿脱离呼吸机中的应用价值。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了接受有创通气的住院新生儿(不包括不符合入组条件的新生儿,例如有非呼吸疾病需要机械通气的新生儿)。所有纳入的新生儿都使用手掌大小的超声机进行LUS。拔管后分为成功组和失败组。结果:采用拔管前后LUS评分预测断奶失败的敏感性分别为83.3和94.6% (95% CI, 0.823-0.986;P结论:LUS可以根据LUS评分预测不同呼吸系统疾病新生儿的断奶失败,GA有或无差异。使用手掌大小的手持式便携式超声机进行LUS是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信