Improving Accessibility to Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Resources Using Artificial Intelligence: A Pilot Study in Patient Education Materials.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ariana L Shaari, Shreya R Bhalla, Parsa P Salehi
{"title":"Improving Accessibility to Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Resources Using Artificial Intelligence: A Pilot Study in Patient Education Materials.","authors":"Ariana L Shaari, Shreya R Bhalla, Parsa P Salehi","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) are evolving, offering new opportunities to enhance patient care. <b>Objective:</b> To determine whether the use of AI platforms for translating patient education materials (PEMs) improves their readability for patients seeking information on facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) procedures. <b>Methods:</b> Text from 25 PEMs on topics such as rhytidectomy, rhinoplasty, and blepharoplasty was extracted. ChatGPT 4.o, ChatGPT 3.5, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini were prompted to translate AAFPRS PEMs to the 6th-grade reading level, the accepted readability standard for PEMs. Readability was determined using Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE). Statistical analysis was performed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 125 PEMs were reviewed. Original PEMs had a mean FKGL, GFI, and FKRE of 10.7, 13.48, and 50.8 respectively, which exceed the recommended level. The translated AI-generated PEMs had a mean FKGL, GFI, and FKRE of 8.41, 10.62, and 64.43 respectively, representing an improvement in readability (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> With physician supervision, AI platforms can improve the readability of PEMs for common FPRS procedures. This strategy may increase the accessibility of educational resources for diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) are evolving, offering new opportunities to enhance patient care. Objective: To determine whether the use of AI platforms for translating patient education materials (PEMs) improves their readability for patients seeking information on facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) procedures. Methods: Text from 25 PEMs on topics such as rhytidectomy, rhinoplasty, and blepharoplasty was extracted. ChatGPT 4.o, ChatGPT 3.5, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini were prompted to translate AAFPRS PEMs to the 6th-grade reading level, the accepted readability standard for PEMs. Readability was determined using Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE). Statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 125 PEMs were reviewed. Original PEMs had a mean FKGL, GFI, and FKRE of 10.7, 13.48, and 50.8 respectively, which exceed the recommended level. The translated AI-generated PEMs had a mean FKGL, GFI, and FKRE of 8.41, 10.62, and 64.43 respectively, representing an improvement in readability (p < 0.001). Conclusion: With physician supervision, AI platforms can improve the readability of PEMs for common FPRS procedures. This strategy may increase the accessibility of educational resources for diverse patient populations.

利用人工智能提高面部整形和重建手术患者资源的可及性:患者教育材料的试点研究。
背景:人工智能(AI)的应用正在不断发展,为加强患者护理提供了新的机会。目的:确定使用人工智能平台翻译患者教育材料(PEMs)是否可以提高患者寻求面部整形和重建手术(FPRS)程序信息的可读性。方法:从25篇PEMs中提取有关除皱、鼻整形和眼睑整形等主题的文本。ChatGPT 4。o、ChatGPT 3.5、Microsoft Copilot和谷歌Gemini被提示将AAFPRS PEMs翻译为六年级阅读水平,这是公认的PEMs可读性标准。采用Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)、Gunning Fog Index (GFI)和Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease (FKRE)测定可读性。进行统计学分析。结果:共回顾125例PEMs。原始PEMs的平均FKGL、GFI和FKRE分别为10.7、13.48和50.8,均超过推荐水平。翻译后的人工智能生成的PEMs的平均FKGL、GFI和FKRE分别为8.41、10.62和64.43,表明可读性有所提高(p < 0.001)。结论:在医生的监督下,人工智能平台可以提高常见FPRS程序的PEMs的可读性。这一策略可能会增加不同患者群体获得教育资源的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信