Imaging in clinical trials of axial spondyloarthritis: what type of imaging should be used.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Iris Eshed, Kay Geert A Hermann
{"title":"Imaging in clinical trials of axial spondyloarthritis: what type of imaging should be used.","authors":"Iris Eshed, Kay Geert A Hermann","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04935-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting the sacroiliac joints and spine. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent structural damage and improve patient outcomes. Imaging plays a pivotal role in axSpA diagnosis, monitoring, and clinical trials, offering insights into both inflammatory activity and structural progression. Conventional radiography has been foundational for detecting structural changes, such as syndesmophytes and erosions, but it is limited by poor sensitivity for early disease detection and significant interobserver variability. Advanced imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and low-dose computed tomography (ld-CT), have emerged as more sensitive tools. MRI excels in identifying active inflammation, particularly bone marrow edema, and is integral to early diagnosis and disease monitoring. ld-CT provides superior spatial resolution for detecting structural lesions while minimizing radiation exposure. However, challenges remain in achieving standardized imaging protocols and consistent scoring systems across clinical trials. Scoring systems like the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores, and Berlin methods require rigorous calibration to ensure reliability. The purpose of this review is to explore the strengths and limitations as well as the use in clinical trials of the different imaging modalities and to offer guidance on selecting the most suitable imaging techniques for assessing both disease activity and structural progression in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04935-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting the sacroiliac joints and spine. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent structural damage and improve patient outcomes. Imaging plays a pivotal role in axSpA diagnosis, monitoring, and clinical trials, offering insights into both inflammatory activity and structural progression. Conventional radiography has been foundational for detecting structural changes, such as syndesmophytes and erosions, but it is limited by poor sensitivity for early disease detection and significant interobserver variability. Advanced imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and low-dose computed tomography (ld-CT), have emerged as more sensitive tools. MRI excels in identifying active inflammation, particularly bone marrow edema, and is integral to early diagnosis and disease monitoring. ld-CT provides superior spatial resolution for detecting structural lesions while minimizing radiation exposure. However, challenges remain in achieving standardized imaging protocols and consistent scoring systems across clinical trials. Scoring systems like the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores, and Berlin methods require rigorous calibration to ensure reliability. The purpose of this review is to explore the strengths and limitations as well as the use in clinical trials of the different imaging modalities and to offer guidance on selecting the most suitable imaging techniques for assessing both disease activity and structural progression in clinical trials.

轴型脊柱炎临床试验中的影像学检查:应采用何种影像学检查?
轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)是一种慢性炎症,主要影响骶髂关节和脊柱。早期和准确的诊断对于预防结构损伤和改善患者预后至关重要。成像在axSpA的诊断、监测和临床试验中起着关键作用,为炎症活动和结构进展提供了见解。传统的x线摄影是检测结构变化的基础,如综合征和侵蚀,但由于早期疾病检测的敏感性差和观察者之间的显著差异,它受到限制。先进的成像方式,如磁共振成像(MRI)和低剂量计算机断层扫描(ld-CT),已经成为更敏感的工具。MRI擅长识别活动性炎症,特别是骨髓水肿,是早期诊断和疾病监测不可或缺的一部分。ld-CT为检测结构性病变提供了优越的空间分辨率,同时最大限度地减少了辐射暴露。然而,在临床试验中实现标准化的成像方案和一致的评分系统仍然存在挑战。评分系统,如改良的斯托克强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分(mSASSS)、加拿大脊柱炎研究联盟(SPARCC)评分和柏林方法需要严格的校准以确保可靠性。本综述的目的是探讨不同成像方式的优势和局限性以及在临床试验中的应用,并为临床试验中评估疾病活动性和结构进展选择最合适的成像技术提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信