Development and Psychometric Testing of the Nurses' Professional Dignity Scale.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Michela Piredda, Maddalena De Maria, Rosario Caruso, Anna Marchetti, Giorgia Petrucci, Anna Cerra, Joyce J Fitzpatrick, Alessandro Stievano
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Testing of the Nurses' Professional Dignity Scale.","authors":"Michela Piredda, Maddalena De Maria, Rosario Caruso, Anna Marchetti, Giorgia Petrucci, Anna Cerra, Joyce J Fitzpatrick, Alessandro Stievano","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15040127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Human dignity is an inalienable value central to human rights and ethics. Professional dignity is pivotal to fostering self-esteem, job satisfaction, and high-quality care in nursing. Despite its importance, no validated tool currently exists to measure nurses' professional dignity in English-speaking contexts. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test the Nurses' Professional Dignity Scale (NPDS). <b>Methods</b>: The tool's development was guided by a theoretical model from a meta-synthesis. A consensus meeting with five nurse researchers identified three core dimensions for the NPDS: Respect, Professional Value, and Appreciation. Nineteen items were initially generated and refined through face and content validity assessments (all item-level content validity indices [I-CVIs] ≥ 0.80; scale-level content validity index/Ave [S-CVI/Ave] = 0.92). Psychometric testing was conducted with 227 nurses across clinical settings in the United States using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate a three-factor model. <b>Results</b>: The CFA confirmed the three-factor model with acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.923, RMSEA = 0.069), resulting in the retention of 15 items. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability, with composite reliability coefficients of 0.92 for Respect, 0.82 for Professional Value, 0.93 for Appreciation, and 0.91 for the overall scale. <b>Conclusions</b>: The NPDS is a valid and reliable measure of nurses' professional dignity, aligning with theoretical frameworks. It captures both status-dignity and condition-dignity aspects, encompassing respect, professional competence, and societal appreciation, offering a multidimensional structure for assessing individual domains and overall scores. The NPDS contributes to advancing nursing research and practice by addressing workplace dignity, enhancing job satisfaction, and fostering supportive organizational environments that recognize nurses' professional worth. Future studies are recommended to validate the scale in diverse populations and explore its stability over time through longitudinal research. This study highlights the importance of preserving nurses' dignity in improving professional identity, workplace environments, and patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Human dignity is an inalienable value central to human rights and ethics. Professional dignity is pivotal to fostering self-esteem, job satisfaction, and high-quality care in nursing. Despite its importance, no validated tool currently exists to measure nurses' professional dignity in English-speaking contexts. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test the Nurses' Professional Dignity Scale (NPDS). Methods: The tool's development was guided by a theoretical model from a meta-synthesis. A consensus meeting with five nurse researchers identified three core dimensions for the NPDS: Respect, Professional Value, and Appreciation. Nineteen items were initially generated and refined through face and content validity assessments (all item-level content validity indices [I-CVIs] ≥ 0.80; scale-level content validity index/Ave [S-CVI/Ave] = 0.92). Psychometric testing was conducted with 227 nurses across clinical settings in the United States using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate a three-factor model. Results: The CFA confirmed the three-factor model with acceptable fit indices (CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.923, RMSEA = 0.069), resulting in the retention of 15 items. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability, with composite reliability coefficients of 0.92 for Respect, 0.82 for Professional Value, 0.93 for Appreciation, and 0.91 for the overall scale. Conclusions: The NPDS is a valid and reliable measure of nurses' professional dignity, aligning with theoretical frameworks. It captures both status-dignity and condition-dignity aspects, encompassing respect, professional competence, and societal appreciation, offering a multidimensional structure for assessing individual domains and overall scores. The NPDS contributes to advancing nursing research and practice by addressing workplace dignity, enhancing job satisfaction, and fostering supportive organizational environments that recognize nurses' professional worth. Future studies are recommended to validate the scale in diverse populations and explore its stability over time through longitudinal research. This study highlights the importance of preserving nurses' dignity in improving professional identity, workplace environments, and patient care outcomes.

护士职业尊严量表的编制与心理测试。
背景/目标:人的尊严是人权和道德的核心,是一项不可剥夺的价值。职业尊严是培养自尊、工作满意度和高质量护理的关键。尽管它很重要,但目前还没有有效的工具来衡量英语环境下护士的职业尊严。本研究旨在编制护士职业尊严量表(NPDS)并进行心理测量学测试。方法:该工具的开发是由一个理论模型从元综合指导。五名护士研究人员在会议上达成共识,确定了NPDS的三个核心维度:尊重、专业价值和欣赏。通过面效度和内容效度评估,初步生成并完善了19个项目(所有项目层面的内容效度指数[I-CVIs]≥0.80;量表级内容效度指数/Ave [S-CVI/Ave] = 0.92)。采用验证性因素分析(CFA)对美国临床环境中的227名护士进行心理测量测试,以验证三因素模型。结果:CFA验证了具有可接受拟合指数的三因素模型(CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.923, RMSEA = 0.069),导致15项保留。量表表现出优异的信度,尊重的复合信度系数为0.92,专业价值的复合信度系数为0.82,欣赏的复合信度系数为0.93,整体量表的复合信度系数为0.91。结论:NPDS是衡量护士职业尊严的有效、可靠的指标,符合理论框架。它涵盖了地位-尊严和条件-尊严两个方面,包括尊重、专业能力和社会欣赏,为评估个人领域和总分提供了一个多维结构。NPDS通过解决工作场所尊严、提高工作满意度和培养认可护士专业价值的支持性组织环境,促进护理研究和实践的发展。未来的研究建议在不同的人群中验证量表,并通过纵向研究探索其随时间的稳定性。本研究强调了维护护士尊严在改善职业认同、工作环境和患者护理结果方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信