Right Ventricular and Left Atrial Strain Predict Volumetric Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shing Ching, Jeffrey Ji-Peng Li, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Rebecca Elisabeth Beyer, Misael Estepa, Christian Stehning, Djawid Hashemi, Natalia Solowjowa, Christoph Klein, Henryk Dreger, Sebastian Kelle, Patrick Doeblin
{"title":"Right Ventricular and Left Atrial Strain Predict Volumetric Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.","authors":"Shing Ching, Jeffrey Ji-Peng Li, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Rebecca Elisabeth Beyer, Misael Estepa, Christian Stehning, Djawid Hashemi, Natalia Solowjowa, Christoph Klein, Henryk Dreger, Sebastian Kelle, Patrick Doeblin","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12040152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While left-bundle-branch-block-related contraction patterns as well as echocardiography-derived strain are variably associated with the volumetric response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the role of CMR-derived strain parameters is unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients receiving CRT implantation were retrospectively analyzed, all of whom had undergone CMR imaging within one year before, and echocardiography within 6 months before and 6-12 months after CRT implantation. We assessed CMR-derived morphological and functional parameters with regard to the echocardiographic response, defined as a reduction in the left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥15%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the standard CMR parameters, the indexed right ventricular volumes in end-diastole (RVEDVi) (74.5 ± 19.5 vs. 94.8 ± 30.2 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and end-systole (RVESVi) (43.2 ± 13.3 vs. 61.6 ± 28.8 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.003), as well as the left atrial (LA) area (24.8 ± 3.5 vs. 30.4 ± 9.5 cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.020), differed significantly between CRT responders and non-responders. In strain analysis, CRT responders showed a significantly better LA global longitudinal strain (GLS) (25.1 ± 10.4 vs. 15.3 ± 10.5, <i>p</i> = 0.002), LA global circumferential strain (GCS) (27.9 ± 14.7 vs. 17.1 ± 13.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), RV GLS (-25.0 ± 6.5 vs. -18.9 ± 7.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and RV free wall strain (-31.1 ± 7.9 vs. -24.9 ± 9.5, <i>p</i> = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMR-derived peak septal circumferential strain and RVEDVi correlated with the echocardiographic volumetric response to CRT at 6-12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12040152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While left-bundle-branch-block-related contraction patterns as well as echocardiography-derived strain are variably associated with the volumetric response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the role of CMR-derived strain parameters is unexplored.

Methods: A total of 50 patients receiving CRT implantation were retrospectively analyzed, all of whom had undergone CMR imaging within one year before, and echocardiography within 6 months before and 6-12 months after CRT implantation. We assessed CMR-derived morphological and functional parameters with regard to the echocardiographic response, defined as a reduction in the left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥15%.

Results: Among the standard CMR parameters, the indexed right ventricular volumes in end-diastole (RVEDVi) (74.5 ± 19.5 vs. 94.8 ± 30.2 mL/m2, p = 0.006) and end-systole (RVESVi) (43.2 ± 13.3 vs. 61.6 ± 28.8 mL/m2, p = 0.003), as well as the left atrial (LA) area (24.8 ± 3.5 vs. 30.4 ± 9.5 cm2, p = 0.020), differed significantly between CRT responders and non-responders. In strain analysis, CRT responders showed a significantly better LA global longitudinal strain (GLS) (25.1 ± 10.4 vs. 15.3 ± 10.5, p = 0.002), LA global circumferential strain (GCS) (27.9 ± 14.7 vs. 17.1 ± 13.1%, p = 0.012), RV GLS (-25.0 ± 6.5 vs. -18.9 ± 7.6%, p = 0.004) and RV free wall strain (-31.1 ± 7.9 vs. -24.9 ± 9.5, p = 0.017).

Conclusions: CMR-derived peak septal circumferential strain and RVEDVi correlated with the echocardiographic volumetric response to CRT at 6-12 months.

右心室和左心房应变预测心脏再同步化治疗的容量反应。
背景:虽然左束-分支阻滞相关的收缩模式以及超声心动图衍生的应变与心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的容积反应有不同的相关性,但cmr衍生的应变参数的作用尚未得到探讨。方法:回顾性分析50例接受CRT植入的患者,均在植入前1年内行CMR成像,在植入前6个月及植入后6-12个月行超声心动图检查。我们评估了cmr衍生的超声心动图反应的形态学和功能参数,定义为左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%。结果:在标准CMR参数中,舒张末期右心室容积(RVEDVi)(74.5±19.5 vs. 94.8±30.2 mL/m2, p = 0.006)、收缩期末期(RVESVi)(43.2±13.3 vs. 61.6±28.8 mL/m2, p = 0.003)和左心房面积(24.8±3.5 vs. 30.4±9.5 cm2, p = 0.020)在CRT应答者和无应答者之间差异有统计学意义。在应变分析中,CRT应答者表现出较好的LA整体纵向应变(GLS)(25.1±10.4比15.3±10.5,p = 0.002)、LA整体周向应变(GCS)(27.9±14.7比17.1±13.1%,p = 0.012)、RV整体GLS(-25.0±6.5比-18.9±7.6%,p = 0.004)和RV游离壁应变(-31.1±7.9比-24.9±9.5,p = 0.017)。结论:cmr衍生的间隔周应变峰值和RVEDVi与6-12个月时对CRT的超声心动图容量反应相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信