A national consensus-based framework on preferred assessments and interventions in current treatment for young people with acquired brain injury in Dutch rehabilitation centers.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Florian Allonsius, Arend de Kloet, Frederike van Markus-Doornbosch, Ingrid Rentinck, Suzanne Lambregts, Karin Huizing, Peter de Koning, Sandra Te Winkel, Christine Resch, Thea Vliet Vlieland, Menno van der Holst
{"title":"A national consensus-based framework on preferred assessments and interventions in current treatment for young people with acquired brain injury in Dutch rehabilitation centers.","authors":"Florian Allonsius, Arend de Kloet, Frederike van Markus-Doornbosch, Ingrid Rentinck, Suzanne Lambregts, Karin Huizing, Peter de Koning, Sandra Te Winkel, Christine Resch, Thea Vliet Vlieland, Menno van der Holst","doi":"10.1177/18758894251337581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acquired brain injury (ABI) is prevalent among young people (4-25 years). When ABI-related problems persist, treatment in a rehabilitation center (RC) may be indicated. However, there is wide variability regarding the delivery of care across Dutch RCs, including assessments, interventions, and psychoeducational (PE) materials. The aim was to create a consensus-based framework with preferred assessments, interventions, and PE-materials to be used in pediatric ABI rehabilitation. A national framework could optimize the delivery of comparable care for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this three-round Delphi study, healthcare professionals (physiatrists, psychologists, social workers, physical/occupational/speech/language therapists) from RCs providing care for young people with ABI were invited to participate. In the first two (online) rounds, currently used assessments/interventions/PE-materials were collected, stepwise-prioritized, subsequently listed per discipline, and classified per International Classification of Functioning (ICF) domain. Results from rounds one/two were discussed in a consensus meeting (in person), aiming to reach agreement on assessments/interventions/PE-materials in the national framework and how to use them in current practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four healthcare professionals from 12 RCs participated. After Delphi round one, 163 assessments, 39 interventions, and 64 PE-materials were collected. After round two, the selection was narrowed down to n = 51/n = 34/n = 28, respectively. After round three, consensus was reached on 37 assessments, 25 interventions (divided over all disciplines/classified per ICF domain), 27 PE-materials, as well as on the use of the framework by all participating RC to enhance clinical reasoning in current practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A consensus-based national framework in ABI rehabilitation has been developed and is now available to optimize the delivery of care for young people with ABI across Dutch RCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"18758894251337581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758894251337581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Acquired brain injury (ABI) is prevalent among young people (4-25 years). When ABI-related problems persist, treatment in a rehabilitation center (RC) may be indicated. However, there is wide variability regarding the delivery of care across Dutch RCs, including assessments, interventions, and psychoeducational (PE) materials. The aim was to create a consensus-based framework with preferred assessments, interventions, and PE-materials to be used in pediatric ABI rehabilitation. A national framework could optimize the delivery of comparable care for this population.

Methods: For this three-round Delphi study, healthcare professionals (physiatrists, psychologists, social workers, physical/occupational/speech/language therapists) from RCs providing care for young people with ABI were invited to participate. In the first two (online) rounds, currently used assessments/interventions/PE-materials were collected, stepwise-prioritized, subsequently listed per discipline, and classified per International Classification of Functioning (ICF) domain. Results from rounds one/two were discussed in a consensus meeting (in person), aiming to reach agreement on assessments/interventions/PE-materials in the national framework and how to use them in current practice.

Results: Seventy-four healthcare professionals from 12 RCs participated. After Delphi round one, 163 assessments, 39 interventions, and 64 PE-materials were collected. After round two, the selection was narrowed down to n = 51/n = 34/n = 28, respectively. After round three, consensus was reached on 37 assessments, 25 interventions (divided over all disciplines/classified per ICF domain), 27 PE-materials, as well as on the use of the framework by all participating RC to enhance clinical reasoning in current practice.

Conclusion: A consensus-based national framework in ABI rehabilitation has been developed and is now available to optimize the delivery of care for young people with ABI across Dutch RCs.

荷兰康复中心目前治疗获得性脑损伤的年轻人的首选评估和干预措施的基于国家共识的框架。
目的:后天性脑损伤(ABI)在年轻人(4-25岁)中普遍存在。当abi相关问题持续存在时,可能需要在康复中心(RC)进行治疗。然而,在荷兰rc的医疗服务方面存在很大的差异,包括评估、干预和心理教育(PE)材料。目的是建立一个基于共识的框架,优选评估、干预措施和pe材料,用于儿童ABI康复。国家框架可以优化为这一人群提供可比护理。方法:在这个三轮德尔菲研究中,来自为ABI青少年提供护理的康复中心的医疗保健专业人员(物理医生、心理学家、社会工作者、物理/职业/言语/语言治疗师)被邀请参加。在前两轮(在线)中,收集当前使用的评估/干预/ pe材料,逐步确定优先级,随后按学科列出,并按国际功能分类(ICF)领域分类。在一次协商一致会议上(面对面)讨论了第一/第二轮的结果,旨在就国家框架中的评估/干预措施/ pe材料以及如何在当前实践中使用它们达成协议。结果:来自12个RCs的74名卫生保健专业人员参与了研究。在德尔菲第一轮后,收集了163项评估,39项干预措施和64项pe材料。在第二轮之后,选择范围分别缩小到n = 51/n = 34/n = 28。在第三轮之后,就37项评估、25项干预措施(按ICF所有学科划分/按ICF领域分类)、27项pe材料以及所有参与RC使用框架以增强当前实践中的临床推理达成了共识。结论:一个以共识为基础的ABI康复国家框架已经开发出来,现在可用于优化荷兰rc中ABI年轻人的护理交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信