The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Advance Care Planning and Healthcare Utilization in People With ALS.

IF 1.4
Mary Katherine Rohrbaugh, Gail Houseman, Amy Cunningham, Stephanie Dobak, Hristelina Ilieva, Margaret Kreher
{"title":"The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Advance Care Planning and Healthcare Utilization in People With ALS.","authors":"Mary Katherine Rohrbaugh, Gail Houseman, Amy Cunningham, Stephanie Dobak, Hristelina Ilieva, Margaret Kreher","doi":"10.1177/10499091251337464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveHalf of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS) develop cognitive impairment and/or behavioral changes, which may affect decision-making ability and participation in advance care planning (ACP) discussions. We aimed to determine the impact cognitive impairment, as measured by the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS), has on PALS' ACP discussions and healthcare utilization.MethodsPALS from a retrospective chart review were categorized into 2 groups: cognitively intact or cognitively impaired (ALS Specific Score < 77, ALS Nonspecific Score < 24, ECAS Total Score < 105, and/or ECAS Behavior or Psychosis Score 1+). Documented advance directives (AD); ACP discussions; and rates of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement, tracheostomy placement, hospitalization within 2 weeks of death, death in hospital, and hospice utilization were recorded. Late disease stage was defined as ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score ≤ 38. Group comparisons were completed using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and independent samples t-tests with <i>P</i> < .05 significance.ResultsThirty-three (47.1%) of 70 PALS met ECAS criteria for cognitive impairment. Rates of AD for PEG placement, AD for tracheostomy placement, hospitalization within 2 weeks of death, death in hospital, and hospice enrollment were not significantly different between groups (<i>P</i> = .41, .62, .32, .30, .06, respectively) despite ALSFRS-R score ≥/< 38 (all <i>P</i> > .05). <b>Conclusions:</b> ACP discussions and healthcare utilization were not affected by cognitive impairment despite disease stage. It is unknown if cognitive impairment affects healthcare decision-making processes for PALS/families. Further research examining the effect of various provider communication strategies on outcomes is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251337464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251337464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveHalf of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS) develop cognitive impairment and/or behavioral changes, which may affect decision-making ability and participation in advance care planning (ACP) discussions. We aimed to determine the impact cognitive impairment, as measured by the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS), has on PALS' ACP discussions and healthcare utilization.MethodsPALS from a retrospective chart review were categorized into 2 groups: cognitively intact or cognitively impaired (ALS Specific Score < 77, ALS Nonspecific Score < 24, ECAS Total Score < 105, and/or ECAS Behavior or Psychosis Score 1+). Documented advance directives (AD); ACP discussions; and rates of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement, tracheostomy placement, hospitalization within 2 weeks of death, death in hospital, and hospice utilization were recorded. Late disease stage was defined as ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score ≤ 38. Group comparisons were completed using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and independent samples t-tests with P < .05 significance.ResultsThirty-three (47.1%) of 70 PALS met ECAS criteria for cognitive impairment. Rates of AD for PEG placement, AD for tracheostomy placement, hospitalization within 2 weeks of death, death in hospital, and hospice enrollment were not significantly different between groups (P = .41, .62, .32, .30, .06, respectively) despite ALSFRS-R score ≥/< 38 (all P > .05). Conclusions: ACP discussions and healthcare utilization were not affected by cognitive impairment despite disease stage. It is unknown if cognitive impairment affects healthcare decision-making processes for PALS/families. Further research examining the effect of various provider communication strategies on outcomes is needed.

认知障碍对ALS患者提前护理计划和医疗保健利用的影响。
一半的肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(PALS)患者会出现认知障碍和/或行为改变,这可能会影响决策能力和参与预先护理计划(ACP)讨论。我们的目的是确定通过爱丁堡认知和行为ALS筛查(ECAS)测量的认知障碍对PALS的ACP讨论和医疗保健利用的影响。方法回顾性图表分析将ALS患者分为2组:认知功能完整或认知功能受损(ALS特异性评分< 77,ALS非特异性评分< 24,ECAS总分< 105,和/或ECAS行为或精神病评分1+)。预先指示文件(AD);机场核心计划讨论;记录经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)置入率、气管造口术置入率、死亡2周内住院率、院内死亡率和临终关怀使用率。疾病晚期定义为ALS功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)评分≤38分。组间比较采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和独立样本t检验,P < 0.05显著性。结果70例pal患者中有33例(47.1%)符合ECAS的认知障碍诊断标准。尽管ALSFRS-R评分≥/< 38,但两组患者的PEG置入率、气管造口置入率、死亡2周内住院率、院内死亡率和临终关怀登记率差异均无统计学意义(P值分别为0.41、0.62、0.32、0.30、0.06)(P值均为0.05)。结论:ACP讨论和医疗保健利用不受疾病分期认知障碍的影响。目前尚不清楚认知障碍是否会影响pal /家庭的医疗决策过程。需要进一步研究各种提供者沟通策略对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信