Measuring Biventricular Function and Left Atrial Volume in a Single 5D Whole-Heart CMR Scan at 0.55T.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xavier Sieber, Katherine Binzel, Juliet Varghese, Yingmin Liu, Jerome Yerly, Christopher W Roy, Panagiotis Antiochos, Milan Prsa, Ruud B van Heeswijk, Orlando P Simonetti, Matthias Stuber
{"title":"Measuring Biventricular Function and Left Atrial Volume in a Single 5D Whole-Heart CMR Scan at 0.55T.","authors":"Xavier Sieber, Katherine Binzel, Juliet Varghese, Yingmin Liu, Jerome Yerly, Christopher W Roy, Panagiotis Antiochos, Milan Prsa, Ruud B van Heeswijk, Orlando P Simonetti, Matthias Stuber","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CMR has not seen widespread adoption beyond large urban academic centers. The reasons for this limited uptake include the cost, time-intensive nature and special expertise of CMR. Self-navigated 5D, x-y-z-cardiac-respiratory, free-funning whole-heart CMR using self-navigation (5D CMR) implemented on a low-field clinical scanner may help bridge this gap for bi-ventricular function assessment and left atrium volume index measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Whole-heart 3D radial phyllotaxis bSSFP data were collected in 10 healthy adult subjects. Self-navigation was used to extract respiratory and cardiac motion signals and to generate motion-resolved 5D CMR datasets. The right- and left-ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF and LVEF), left atrial volume index (LAVI), contrast ratio, sharpness, perceived image quality, and total scan durations were ascertained and compared to those obtained with the reference 2D cine images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5D CMR allowed for time-efficient and concordant measurements when compared to the 2D reference method. The 5D CMR images resulted in lower CR on 5D CMR images (3.3 ± 2.9) than on 2D cines (4.7 ± 1.2), and similarly lower perceived image quality (1.8 ± 0.8 for 5D CMR and 3.6 ± 0.9 for the 2D cines). However, the LVEF measurements were similar with no statistically significant differences (Mean: 58 ± 5% for 5D CMR and 59 ± 5% for 2D cine, p = 0.49) and the LoA were low (-2.81% to 3.81%). For the RVEF, the measurements were also in good agreement when RVEF was measured on the axial views (60 ± 3% for 5D CMR and 60 ± 4% for 2D cine, p = 0.85) and the LoA were also low (-2.87% to 3.07%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>5D CMR without the need for ECG, breath-holding, navigators, or complex scan planning enables a highly simplified and time-efficient assessment of bi-ventricular cardiac function on a 0.55T clinical system in 7:50min.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101906"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101906","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CMR has not seen widespread adoption beyond large urban academic centers. The reasons for this limited uptake include the cost, time-intensive nature and special expertise of CMR. Self-navigated 5D, x-y-z-cardiac-respiratory, free-funning whole-heart CMR using self-navigation (5D CMR) implemented on a low-field clinical scanner may help bridge this gap for bi-ventricular function assessment and left atrium volume index measurement.

Methods: Whole-heart 3D radial phyllotaxis bSSFP data were collected in 10 healthy adult subjects. Self-navigation was used to extract respiratory and cardiac motion signals and to generate motion-resolved 5D CMR datasets. The right- and left-ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF and LVEF), left atrial volume index (LAVI), contrast ratio, sharpness, perceived image quality, and total scan durations were ascertained and compared to those obtained with the reference 2D cine images.

Results: 5D CMR allowed for time-efficient and concordant measurements when compared to the 2D reference method. The 5D CMR images resulted in lower CR on 5D CMR images (3.3 ± 2.9) than on 2D cines (4.7 ± 1.2), and similarly lower perceived image quality (1.8 ± 0.8 for 5D CMR and 3.6 ± 0.9 for the 2D cines). However, the LVEF measurements were similar with no statistically significant differences (Mean: 58 ± 5% for 5D CMR and 59 ± 5% for 2D cine, p = 0.49) and the LoA were low (-2.81% to 3.81%). For the RVEF, the measurements were also in good agreement when RVEF was measured on the axial views (60 ± 3% for 5D CMR and 60 ± 4% for 2D cine, p = 0.85) and the LoA were also low (-2.87% to 3.07%).

Conclusion: 5D CMR without the need for ECG, breath-holding, navigators, or complex scan planning enables a highly simplified and time-efficient assessment of bi-ventricular cardiac function on a 0.55T clinical system in 7:50min.

在0.55T单次5D全心CMR扫描中测量双室功能和左房容积。
背景:CMR在大城市学术中心之外还没有被广泛采用。这种有限采用的原因包括成本、时间密集的性质和CMR的特殊专业知识。在低场临床扫描仪上使用自导航(5D CMR)的自导航5D, x-y-z心-呼吸,自由运转全心CMR可能有助于弥补双心室功能评估和左心房容量指数测量的差距。方法:采集10例健康成人全心三维径向叶根性bSSFP数据。自我导航用于提取呼吸和心脏运动信号,并生成运动分辨率的5D CMR数据集。确定右、左心室射血分数(RVEF和LVEF)、左心房容积指数(LAVI)、对比度、清晰度、感知图像质量和总扫描时间,并与参考二维电影图像的结果进行比较。结果:与2D参考方法相比,5D CMR允许时间效率和一致性测量。5D CMR图像导致5D CMR图像的CR(3.3±2.9)低于2D电影(4.7±1.2),同样较低的感知图像质量(5D CMR为1.8±0.8和2D电影为3.6±0.9)。然而,LVEF测量值相似,无统计学差异(5D CMR平均值为58±5%,2D电影平均值为59±5%,p = 0.49), LoA较低(-2.81%至3.81%)。对于RVEF,在轴向视图上测量RVEF (5D CMR为60±3%,2D cine为60±4%,p = 0.85)的测量结果也很一致,LoA也很低(-2.87%至3.07%)。结论:5D CMR无需ECG、屏气、导航仪或复杂的扫描计划,可以在0.55T的临床系统上在7:50分钟内高度简化和高效地评估双室心功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信