Treatment Acceptability and Satisfaction With Cough Skill Training in Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jordanna S Sevitz, Nicole Rogus-Pulia, Georgia A Malandraki, Michelle S Troche
{"title":"Treatment Acceptability and Satisfaction With Cough Skill Training in Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Jordanna S Sevitz, Nicole Rogus-Pulia, Georgia A Malandraki, Michelle S Troche","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite evidence to suggest that rehabilitation can improve airway protection in people with Parkinson's disease (pwPD), rehabilitative therapies are underutilized. One newer treatment approach with growing evidence to support its efficacy is cough skill training (CST). To improve utilization of rehabilitations such as CST, it is important to understand patient treatment experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define treatment acceptability and satisfaction of CST in pwPD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirteen pwPD were consecutively recruited from a trial during which participants completed two in-person sessions of CST via spirometry over 2 weeks. A mixed-methods approach was used, whereby quantitative data (obtained from questionnaires) and qualitative data (obtained from semistructured interviews) were integrated to provide a holistic understanding of patient experience. Data collection and thematic analyses (of qualitative data) were guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While treatment demonstrated adequate acceptability with a System Usability Scale median score of 70/100 (scores ≥ 70 indicate acceptability), integrative examination of patient experience revealed several themes that highlight barriers and facilitators to treatment acceptability-as they relate to CST tools (visualization, lip seal, and measurement accuracy) and tasks (practice targets, feedback, practice amount, and future training). Most (61.5%) participants were \"satisfied\" or \"very satisfied\" with CST. Four themes emerged related to satisfaction: treatment <i>relevance</i>, patient <i>awareness and control</i> over their disease, <i>skill acquisition</i>, and <i>skill transference</i> to real-life choking events<i>.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, patient responses indicated that small, personalized adaptations to equipment, training targets, and feedback may enhance their experiences, while education and personalized goal setting may enhance treatment relevance and perceived benefit. Patient perspectives and needs can inform the refinement of person-centered clinical implementation of CST and improve treatment uptake.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28887167.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"2782-2801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite evidence to suggest that rehabilitation can improve airway protection in people with Parkinson's disease (pwPD), rehabilitative therapies are underutilized. One newer treatment approach with growing evidence to support its efficacy is cough skill training (CST). To improve utilization of rehabilitations such as CST, it is important to understand patient treatment experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define treatment acceptability and satisfaction of CST in pwPD.

Method: Thirteen pwPD were consecutively recruited from a trial during which participants completed two in-person sessions of CST via spirometry over 2 weeks. A mixed-methods approach was used, whereby quantitative data (obtained from questionnaires) and qualitative data (obtained from semistructured interviews) were integrated to provide a holistic understanding of patient experience. Data collection and thematic analyses (of qualitative data) were guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework.

Results: While treatment demonstrated adequate acceptability with a System Usability Scale median score of 70/100 (scores ≥ 70 indicate acceptability), integrative examination of patient experience revealed several themes that highlight barriers and facilitators to treatment acceptability-as they relate to CST tools (visualization, lip seal, and measurement accuracy) and tasks (practice targets, feedback, practice amount, and future training). Most (61.5%) participants were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with CST. Four themes emerged related to satisfaction: treatment relevance, patient awareness and control over their disease, skill acquisition, and skill transference to real-life choking events.

Conclusions: In this study, patient responses indicated that small, personalized adaptations to equipment, training targets, and feedback may enhance their experiences, while education and personalized goal setting may enhance treatment relevance and perceived benefit. Patient perspectives and needs can inform the refinement of person-centered clinical implementation of CST and improve treatment uptake.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28887167.

帕金森病咳嗽技能训练的治疗可接受性和满意度:一项混合方法研究。
目的:尽管有证据表明康复可以改善帕金森病(pwPD)患者的气道保护,但康复治疗尚未得到充分利用。有越来越多证据支持其疗效的一种较新的治疗方法是咳嗽技能训练(CST)。为了提高对CST等康复疗法的利用,了解患者的治疗经验是很重要的。因此,本研究的目的是确定CST在pwPD中的治疗可接受性和满意度。方法:从一项试验中连续招募了13名pwPD,在此期间,参与者通过肺活量测定法在2周内完成了两次CST面对面治疗。采用混合方法,将定量数据(从问卷中获得)和定性数据(从半结构化访谈中获得)相结合,以提供对患者体验的整体理解。数据收集和专题分析(定性数据)由患者安全系统工程倡议框架指导。结果:虽然治疗表现出足够的可接受性,系统可用性量表的中位数得分为70/100(得分≥70表示可接受),但对患者体验的综合检查揭示了几个主题,这些主题突出了治疗可接受性的障碍和促进因素,因为它们与CST工具(可视化、唇密封和测量准确性)和任务(实践目标、反馈、练习量和未来培训)有关。大多数(61.5%)受访者对CST感到“满意”或“非常满意”。与满意度相关的四个主题出现了:治疗相关性,患者对疾病的认识和控制,技能获得和技能转移到现实生活中的窒息事件。结论:在这项研究中,患者的反应表明,对设备、培训目标和反馈进行小的个性化调整可能会增强他们的体验,而教育和个性化目标设定可能会增强治疗的相关性和感知效益。患者的观点和需求可以为改进以人为中心的CST临床实施提供信息,并提高治疗的接受度。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28887167。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书