Exploring the landscape of palliative care provision for black patients with hematologic cancers: A scoping review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Osborn Owusu Ansah, Silas Selorm Daniels-Donkor, Leila Ledbetter, Matthew LeBlanc, Sophia K Smith
{"title":"Exploring the landscape of palliative care provision for black patients with hematologic cancers: A scoping review.","authors":"Osborn Owusu Ansah, Silas Selorm Daniels-Donkor, Leila Ledbetter, Matthew LeBlanc, Sophia K Smith","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with cancer benefit greatly from receiving palliative care (PC), improving their overall survival and quality of life. Despite its benefits, PC is underutilized among patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs), particularly among Black patients, who face higher symptom burdens and lower survival rates compared to White patients. The purpose of this review was to identify and describe what is known about PC use among Black HM patients in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach for scoping reviews and included a search of the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus and Web of Science (Clarivate). The search was developed and conducted by a professional medical librarian in consultation with the author team and focused on keywords such as Black/African American patients, HM, and PC. Articles were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria and carried out using Covidence software for systematic review management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven publications were included in the final sample and most used quantitative methods and data from large national databases such as the National Cancer Database. Four of the studies reported that Black patients with HM were less likely to receive or use PC compared to White patients. Access to PC was associated with better outcomes, such as lower hospital charges and a reduced likelihood of dying within 30 days of initiating palliative radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Significance of the results: </strong>This scoping review highlights ongoing inequities in the use of PC among Black patients with HM which mirrors trends in patients with solid cancers. Future studies should be conducted to understand the determinants of these disparities and to also build testable interventions to improve PC use within this underserved population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with cancer benefit greatly from receiving palliative care (PC), improving their overall survival and quality of life. Despite its benefits, PC is underutilized among patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs), particularly among Black patients, who face higher symptom burdens and lower survival rates compared to White patients. The purpose of this review was to identify and describe what is known about PC use among Black HM patients in the United States.

Methods: This review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach for scoping reviews and included a search of the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus and Web of Science (Clarivate). The search was developed and conducted by a professional medical librarian in consultation with the author team and focused on keywords such as Black/African American patients, HM, and PC. Articles were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria and carried out using Covidence software for systematic review management.

Results: Seven publications were included in the final sample and most used quantitative methods and data from large national databases such as the National Cancer Database. Four of the studies reported that Black patients with HM were less likely to receive or use PC compared to White patients. Access to PC was associated with better outcomes, such as lower hospital charges and a reduced likelihood of dying within 30 days of initiating palliative radiotherapy.

Significance of the results: This scoping review highlights ongoing inequities in the use of PC among Black patients with HM which mirrors trends in patients with solid cancers. Future studies should be conducted to understand the determinants of these disparities and to also build testable interventions to improve PC use within this underserved population.

探索为黑人血液病患者提供姑息治疗的景观:范围审查。
目的:癌症患者接受姑息治疗(palliative care, PC)后获益显著,可提高患者的总体生存期和生活质量。尽管有益处,但PC在血液恶性肿瘤(HMs)患者中未得到充分利用,特别是在黑人患者中,与白人患者相比,黑人患者面临更高的症状负担和更低的生存率。本综述的目的是确定和描述美国黑人HM患者中PC使用的已知情况。方法:本综述采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行范围综述,包括检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase(爱思唯尔)、Scopus和Web of Science (Clarivate)数据库。搜索是由一位专业的医学图书馆员与作者团队协商后开发和执行的,重点关注诸如黑人/非裔美国人患者、HM和PC等关键词。根据预先确定的纳入标准对文章进行筛选和选择,并使用covid - ence软件进行系统评价管理。结果:最终样本中包括7份出版物,大多数使用定量方法和来自国家癌症数据库等大型国家数据库的数据。其中四项研究报告说,与白人患者相比,黑人HM患者接受或使用PC的可能性更小。获得PC与更好的结果相关,例如较低的医院费用和在开始姑息性放疗后30天内死亡的可能性降低。结果的意义:这项范围审查强调了黑人HM患者中PC使用的持续不平等,这反映了实体癌患者的趋势。未来的研究应该进行,以了解这些差异的决定因素,并建立可测试的干预措施,以提高个人电脑在这一服务不足的人群中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信