Cardiovascular, antinociceptive and electroencephalographic effects of epidural and unintentional spinal anaesthesia in pigs: an observational prospective trial
Chiara Parodi , Marie Rabinovici , Luisana G. Garcia Casalta , Mariafrancesca Petrucci , Manuel Egle , Sarah L. Longnus , Daniela Casoni
{"title":"Cardiovascular, antinociceptive and electroencephalographic effects of epidural and unintentional spinal anaesthesia in pigs: an observational prospective trial","authors":"Chiara Parodi , Marie Rabinovici , Luisana G. Garcia Casalta , Mariafrancesca Petrucci , Manuel Egle , Sarah L. Longnus , Daniela Casoni","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To report rate of unintentional spinal puncture and compare intraoperative effects of a combination of morphine and ropivacaine at a volume of 0.2 mL kg<sup>–1</sup> in the lumbosacral epidural or subarachnoid space.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Prospective, observational, experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><div>A total of 36 Edelschwein pigs (34 males and two females) 4 ± 0.5 months old, 55.6 ± 6.5 kg bodyweight (mean ± standard deviation).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>With pigs anaesthetized in sternal recumbency, an 18 gauge Tuohy needle was inserted at the lumbosacral intervertebral space intending to reach the epidural space. If the dural sac was accidentally punctured, the same volumes of ropivacaine 0.75% (1.45 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) and morphine (0.1 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) were administered spinally. Invasive blood pressure (IBP) and heart rate (HR) (<em>n</em> = 36) and electroencephalogram variables (<em>n</em> = 17) were recorded before and at regular intervals after injection. Differences in IBP over time and between groups were investigated with two-way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA. Remaining values were compared with RM ANOVA on ranks (over time) and U test (between groups, only for HR). <em>p</em> < 0.05. Need for rescue analgesia was reported in the 11 animals that underwent sternotomy before circulatory death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rate of accidental spinal puncture was 36%. After epidural or spinal injection, IBP significantly decreased over time but mean arterial pressure did not decrease below the treatment cut-off (65 mmHg). There was no significant difference between groups. HR did not vary significantly over time, nor did electroencephalogram variables. Overall antinociceptive efficacy was 81.8%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><div>Lumbosacral epidural or spinal administration of ropivacaine and morphine (0.2 mL kg–1) caused mild cardiovascular alterations, prevented autonomic responses during sternotomy and did not worsen electroencephalographic cortical depression. In pigs, reducing the volume injected when the dural sac is accidentally punctured does not seem necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 429-437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298725000662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To report rate of unintentional spinal puncture and compare intraoperative effects of a combination of morphine and ropivacaine at a volume of 0.2 mL kg–1 in the lumbosacral epidural or subarachnoid space.
Study design
Prospective, observational, experimental study.
Animals
A total of 36 Edelschwein pigs (34 males and two females) 4 ± 0.5 months old, 55.6 ± 6.5 kg bodyweight (mean ± standard deviation).
Methods
With pigs anaesthetized in sternal recumbency, an 18 gauge Tuohy needle was inserted at the lumbosacral intervertebral space intending to reach the epidural space. If the dural sac was accidentally punctured, the same volumes of ropivacaine 0.75% (1.45 mg kg–1) and morphine (0.1 mg kg–1) were administered spinally. Invasive blood pressure (IBP) and heart rate (HR) (n = 36) and electroencephalogram variables (n = 17) were recorded before and at regular intervals after injection. Differences in IBP over time and between groups were investigated with two-way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA. Remaining values were compared with RM ANOVA on ranks (over time) and U test (between groups, only for HR). p < 0.05. Need for rescue analgesia was reported in the 11 animals that underwent sternotomy before circulatory death.
Results
Rate of accidental spinal puncture was 36%. After epidural or spinal injection, IBP significantly decreased over time but mean arterial pressure did not decrease below the treatment cut-off (65 mmHg). There was no significant difference between groups. HR did not vary significantly over time, nor did electroencephalogram variables. Overall antinociceptive efficacy was 81.8%.
Conclusions and clinical relevance
Lumbosacral epidural or spinal administration of ropivacaine and morphine (0.2 mL kg–1) caused mild cardiovascular alterations, prevented autonomic responses during sternotomy and did not worsen electroencephalographic cortical depression. In pigs, reducing the volume injected when the dural sac is accidentally punctured does not seem necessary.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome:
the basic sciences;
pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management
equipment
intensive care
chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals
welfare issues associated with pain and distress
education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.
Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.