Push-out Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites Used as Intracanal Anchorage Material.

Richard Sturm, Hagay Shemesh, Emely Bortel, Bernhard Hesse, Kerstin Bitter
{"title":"Push-out Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites Used as Intracanal Anchorage Material.","authors":"Richard Sturm, Hagay Shemesh, Emely Bortel, Bernhard Hesse, Kerstin Bitter","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_1991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of different composites with varying viscosity for their suitability as intracanal anchorage (ICA) materials using push-out bond strength testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>48 human maxillary incisors were root filled, crowns partially removed except one residual wall, and distributed into four groups (n = 12), according to one of the following ICA composites: Ormocer (AFx), preheated composite (VB), core build-up (RDC) or flowable (SDR). A 4 mm deep root canal enlargement was prepared using Gates Glidden burrs, and hard tissues were conditioned using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode. Intracanal cavities were filled using the groups' specific ICA material and a nanohybrid composite (GrandioSO, VOCO) for crown reconstruction. Two samples per group were scanned using phase-contrast-enhanced µ-computer tomography (PCE-CT). The remaining samples were thermo-mechanically loaded (TML), and push-out bond strengths and fracture patterns of ICA materials were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Push-out bond strengths were significantly affected by ICA materials (P = 0.001) and location inside the root canal (P 0.005; generalized estimating equations). VB showed a significantly lower bond strength (13.5MPa ± 5.3MPa) compared to RDC (19.6MPa ±7.6MPa) and AFx (21.4MPa ±7.6MPa), but did not differ significantly from SDR (20MPa ± 10.3MPa). All groups demonstrated predominantly adhesive failures between the composite and dentin (P 0.05; Chi-square test). µ-CT scans indicate material-dependent localization and quantity of voids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survival rates after TML and the push-out bond strength values indicate a sufficient bonding of all ICA materials. Frequently occurring voids highlight problems of application and the effects of materials' viscosity on void formation and bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_1991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of different composites with varying viscosity for their suitability as intracanal anchorage (ICA) materials using push-out bond strength testing.

Materials and methods: 48 human maxillary incisors were root filled, crowns partially removed except one residual wall, and distributed into four groups (n = 12), according to one of the following ICA composites: Ormocer (AFx), preheated composite (VB), core build-up (RDC) or flowable (SDR). A 4 mm deep root canal enlargement was prepared using Gates Glidden burrs, and hard tissues were conditioned using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode. Intracanal cavities were filled using the groups' specific ICA material and a nanohybrid composite (GrandioSO, VOCO) for crown reconstruction. Two samples per group were scanned using phase-contrast-enhanced µ-computer tomography (PCE-CT). The remaining samples were thermo-mechanically loaded (TML), and push-out bond strengths and fracture patterns of ICA materials were analyzed.

Results: Push-out bond strengths were significantly affected by ICA materials (P = 0.001) and location inside the root canal (P 0.005; generalized estimating equations). VB showed a significantly lower bond strength (13.5MPa ± 5.3MPa) compared to RDC (19.6MPa ±7.6MPa) and AFx (21.4MPa ±7.6MPa), but did not differ significantly from SDR (20MPa ± 10.3MPa). All groups demonstrated predominantly adhesive failures between the composite and dentin (P 0.05; Chi-square test). µ-CT scans indicate material-dependent localization and quantity of voids.

Conclusion: The survival rates after TML and the push-out bond strength values indicate a sufficient bonding of all ICA materials. Frequently occurring voids highlight problems of application and the effects of materials' viscosity on void formation and bond strength.

块状填充复合材料作为管内锚固材料的推出粘结强度研究。
目的:通过推出粘结强度测试,评价不同粘度的复合材料作为管内锚固(ICA)材料的适用性。材料与方法:将48颗人上颌切牙进行牙根充填,除残壁外部分去除冠,根据ICA复合材料(Ormocer, AFx)、预热复合材料(VB, RDC)、流动复合材料(SDR)分为4组(n = 12)。使用Gates Glidden毛刺准备4 mm深的根管扩大,并使用通用粘合剂在蚀刻-冲洗模式下对硬组织进行处理。使用各组特定的ICA材料和纳米复合材料(GrandioSO, VOCO)填充管内腔进行冠重建。采用相衬增强微计算机断层扫描(PCE-CT)对每组两个样本进行扫描。其余样品进行热机械加载(TML),并分析了ICA材料的推出粘结强度和断裂模式。结果:ICA材料(P = 0.001)和根管内位置(P = 0.005;广义估计方程)。VB的结合强度(13.5MPa±5.3MPa)明显低于RDC (19.6MPa±7.6MPa)和AFx (21.4MPa±7.6MPa),但与SDR (20MPa±10.3MPa)差异不显著。所有组均以复合材料与牙本质粘结失败为主(P < 0.05;卡方检验)。微ct扫描显示与材料相关的空洞定位和数量。结论:TML后的存活率和推出结合强度值表明所有ICA材料的结合是充分的。频繁出现的空洞突出了应用问题以及材料粘度对空洞形成和粘结强度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信