Richard Sturm, Hagay Shemesh, Emely Bortel, Bernhard Hesse, Kerstin Bitter
{"title":"Push-out Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites Used as Intracanal Anchorage Material.","authors":"Richard Sturm, Hagay Shemesh, Emely Bortel, Bernhard Hesse, Kerstin Bitter","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_1991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of different composites with varying viscosity for their suitability as intracanal anchorage (ICA) materials using push-out bond strength testing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>48 human maxillary incisors were root filled, crowns partially removed except one residual wall, and distributed into four groups (n = 12), according to one of the following ICA composites: Ormocer (AFx), preheated composite (VB), core build-up (RDC) or flowable (SDR). A 4 mm deep root canal enlargement was prepared using Gates Glidden burrs, and hard tissues were conditioned using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode. Intracanal cavities were filled using the groups' specific ICA material and a nanohybrid composite (GrandioSO, VOCO) for crown reconstruction. Two samples per group were scanned using phase-contrast-enhanced µ-computer tomography (PCE-CT). The remaining samples were thermo-mechanically loaded (TML), and push-out bond strengths and fracture patterns of ICA materials were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Push-out bond strengths were significantly affected by ICA materials (P = 0.001) and location inside the root canal (P 0.005; generalized estimating equations). VB showed a significantly lower bond strength (13.5MPa ± 5.3MPa) compared to RDC (19.6MPa ±7.6MPa) and AFx (21.4MPa ±7.6MPa), but did not differ significantly from SDR (20MPa ± 10.3MPa). All groups demonstrated predominantly adhesive failures between the composite and dentin (P 0.05; Chi-square test). µ-CT scans indicate material-dependent localization and quantity of voids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survival rates after TML and the push-out bond strength values indicate a sufficient bonding of all ICA materials. Frequently occurring voids highlight problems of application and the effects of materials' viscosity on void formation and bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_1991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of different composites with varying viscosity for their suitability as intracanal anchorage (ICA) materials using push-out bond strength testing.
Materials and methods: 48 human maxillary incisors were root filled, crowns partially removed except one residual wall, and distributed into four groups (n = 12), according to one of the following ICA composites: Ormocer (AFx), preheated composite (VB), core build-up (RDC) or flowable (SDR). A 4 mm deep root canal enlargement was prepared using Gates Glidden burrs, and hard tissues were conditioned using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode. Intracanal cavities were filled using the groups' specific ICA material and a nanohybrid composite (GrandioSO, VOCO) for crown reconstruction. Two samples per group were scanned using phase-contrast-enhanced µ-computer tomography (PCE-CT). The remaining samples were thermo-mechanically loaded (TML), and push-out bond strengths and fracture patterns of ICA materials were analyzed.
Results: Push-out bond strengths were significantly affected by ICA materials (P = 0.001) and location inside the root canal (P 0.005; generalized estimating equations). VB showed a significantly lower bond strength (13.5MPa ± 5.3MPa) compared to RDC (19.6MPa ±7.6MPa) and AFx (21.4MPa ±7.6MPa), but did not differ significantly from SDR (20MPa ± 10.3MPa). All groups demonstrated predominantly adhesive failures between the composite and dentin (P 0.05; Chi-square test). µ-CT scans indicate material-dependent localization and quantity of voids.
Conclusion: The survival rates after TML and the push-out bond strength values indicate a sufficient bonding of all ICA materials. Frequently occurring voids highlight problems of application and the effects of materials' viscosity on void formation and bond strength.