[Experimental study of GBE50 on facial nerve after being crushed in rabbits].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2025-02-01
Hai-Bin Lu, Bing-Bing Zhang, Hui Yu, Yu-E Wang, Shu-Jiang Wu, Qiu-Xu Wang
{"title":"[Experimental study of GBE50 on facial nerve after being crushed in rabbits].","authors":"Hai-Bin Lu, Bing-Bing Zhang, Hui Yu, Yu-E Wang, Shu-Jiang Wu, Qiu-Xu Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the regeneration and repair effects of GBE50 and mecobalamin on facial nerve crush injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty healthy Japan giant ear rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups,namely GBE50 treatment group, mecobalamin treatment group, normal control group and model control group. Each group contained 10 rabbits. Superior buccal branch of facial nerve cursh injured models were established for 2 treatment groups and model control group, while facial incision was made without crush injuries of facial nerve for normal control group. The treatment group was given GBE50 and mecobalamin respectively, while the control group was only given 1 mL of normal saline, respectively. After 28 days of treatment, rabbits' facial injured beard and orbicularis oris muscle movements were observed, neuroelectrophysiological tests, histomorphological observation, and image analysis were performed, facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery were detected. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the model control group, the beard and orbicularis oris muscle movement recovery of rabbits were the worst, but GBE50 treatment group showed better recovery than mecobalamin treatment group. The action potential latency in GBE50 group was lower than the mecobalamin group, and significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The action potential amplitude of GBE50 group was higher than that of mecobalamin group, and significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05). Image analysis result of never myelinated axons area and axon counts of GBE50 group was higher than that of mecobalamin group, and significantly higher than control group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBE50 is superior to mecobalamin in efficacy and speed of facial nerve repair, and it is expected to become another therapeutic drug for rapid and effective treatment of facial nerve injury in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"34 1","pages":"14-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the regeneration and repair effects of GBE50 and mecobalamin on facial nerve crush injury.

Methods: Forty healthy Japan giant ear rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups,namely GBE50 treatment group, mecobalamin treatment group, normal control group and model control group. Each group contained 10 rabbits. Superior buccal branch of facial nerve cursh injured models were established for 2 treatment groups and model control group, while facial incision was made without crush injuries of facial nerve for normal control group. The treatment group was given GBE50 and mecobalamin respectively, while the control group was only given 1 mL of normal saline, respectively. After 28 days of treatment, rabbits' facial injured beard and orbicularis oris muscle movements were observed, neuroelectrophysiological tests, histomorphological observation, and image analysis were performed, facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery were detected. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software package.

Results: In the model control group, the beard and orbicularis oris muscle movement recovery of rabbits were the worst, but GBE50 treatment group showed better recovery than mecobalamin treatment group. The action potential latency in GBE50 group was lower than the mecobalamin group, and significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The action potential amplitude of GBE50 group was higher than that of mecobalamin group, and significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05). Image analysis result of never myelinated axons area and axon counts of GBE50 group was higher than that of mecobalamin group, and significantly higher than control group (P<0.05).

Conclusions: GBE50 is superior to mecobalamin in efficacy and speed of facial nerve repair, and it is expected to become another therapeutic drug for rapid and effective treatment of facial nerve injury in clinical practice.

[GBE50对家兔面神经压碎后作用的实验研究]。
目的:比较GBE50和甲钴胺对面神经挤压损伤的再生修复作用。方法:健康日本巨耳兔40只,随机分为4组,即GBE50治疗组、甲钴胺治疗组、正常对照组和模型对照组。每组10只。2个治疗组和模型对照组分别建立面神经上颊支挤压损伤模型,正常对照组面神经挤压损伤不做面部切口。治疗组分别给予GBE50和甲钴胺,对照组仅给予生理盐水1 mL。治疗28 d后,观察家兔面部损伤胡须及口轮匝肌的运动情况,进行神经电生理检查、组织形态学观察和图像分析,检测面神经再生和功能恢复情况。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行分析。结果:模型对照组家兔的胡须和口轮匝肌运动恢复最差,但GBE50治疗组恢复效果好于甲钴胺治疗组。GBE50组动作电位潜伏期低于甲钴胺组,且显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。GBE50组动作电位幅值高于甲钴胺组,且显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。图像分析结果显示,GBE50组无髓鞘轴突面积和轴突数量均高于甲钴胺组,且显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:GBE50在面神经修复的疗效和速度上均优于甲钴胺,有望在临床实践中成为另一种快速有效治疗面神经损伤的治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍: "Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信