Jun Yang Tay, Sharavan Sadasiv Mucheli, Bingwen Eugene Fan, Sing-Zern Fong, Chek Kia Boo, Ying Ding, Wanni Chia, Chee Wah Tan, Barnaby Young, Poh Lian Lim, Yee Sin Leo, Suma Rao, Ai Leen Ang, Allison Tso, Venkata Sreekanth Sampath, Stephrene Seok Wei Chan, Ponnudurai Kuperan, Christopher Dheepa, Wah Wah Say Naw, Ah Eng Ang, Connie Siew Ping Chen, Laurence Sandig, David Lye, Lin-Fa Wang, Kiat Hoe Ong, Shawn Vasoo
{"title":"Convalescent plasma for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: the Singapore experience and lessons learnt.","authors":"Jun Yang Tay, Sharavan Sadasiv Mucheli, Bingwen Eugene Fan, Sing-Zern Fong, Chek Kia Boo, Ying Ding, Wanni Chia, Chee Wah Tan, Barnaby Young, Poh Lian Lim, Yee Sin Leo, Suma Rao, Ai Leen Ang, Allison Tso, Venkata Sreekanth Sampath, Stephrene Seok Wei Chan, Ponnudurai Kuperan, Christopher Dheepa, Wah Wah Say Naw, Ah Eng Ang, Connie Siew Ping Chen, Laurence Sandig, David Lye, Lin-Fa Wang, Kiat Hoe Ong, Shawn Vasoo","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We report Singapore's convalescent plasma (CP) programme during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on historical data and its potential therapeutic promise, CP was offered as an experimental treatment option for severe or high-risk COVID-19 patients when established therapeutics were lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CP programme was implemented under monitored expanded access approved by Singapore's Ministry of Health. CP donors were primarily selected based on specific antibody titres, while suitable recipients were chosen based on risk factors and disease severity. Operational protocols and logistical considerations are discussed in-depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2020 and September 2020, the CP donor programme successfully collected 33 plasma units from 27 qualified donors. Seven patients received CP treatment under this programme. Six of the seven recipients of CP survived for more than 28 days post-transfusion and were discharged alive. Given the availability of other validated therapeutic options, the CP programme was officially suspended in September 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of Singapore's CP programme, from its operational challenges to the observed clinical outcomes, while highlighting the potential benefits and complexities of CP as a therapeutic option. Successful implementation of the CP programme requires robust collaboration across multidisciplinary teams. Access to serological tests was crucial for donor selection. Both the selection of CP with high neutralising antibodies and careful selection of appropriate recipients are key aspects to optimise the therapeutic success of CP. A meticulous approach is warranted if CP were to be used in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: We report Singapore's convalescent plasma (CP) programme during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on historical data and its potential therapeutic promise, CP was offered as an experimental treatment option for severe or high-risk COVID-19 patients when established therapeutics were lacking.
Methods: The CP programme was implemented under monitored expanded access approved by Singapore's Ministry of Health. CP donors were primarily selected based on specific antibody titres, while suitable recipients were chosen based on risk factors and disease severity. Operational protocols and logistical considerations are discussed in-depth.
Results: Between April 2020 and September 2020, the CP donor programme successfully collected 33 plasma units from 27 qualified donors. Seven patients received CP treatment under this programme. Six of the seven recipients of CP survived for more than 28 days post-transfusion and were discharged alive. Given the availability of other validated therapeutic options, the CP programme was officially suspended in September 2021.
Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of Singapore's CP programme, from its operational challenges to the observed clinical outcomes, while highlighting the potential benefits and complexities of CP as a therapeutic option. Successful implementation of the CP programme requires robust collaboration across multidisciplinary teams. Access to serological tests was crucial for donor selection. Both the selection of CP with high neutralising antibodies and careful selection of appropriate recipients are key aspects to optimise the therapeutic success of CP. A meticulous approach is warranted if CP were to be used in future pandemics.