Preparedness of Dental Undergraduates for Clinical Practice: A Comparison Between Evaluations by Students and Academic Faculty.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/9065801
Kamis Gaballah, Kamran Ali, Daniel Zahra, Eteman Ibrahim
{"title":"Preparedness of Dental Undergraduates for Clinical Practice: A Comparison Between Evaluations by Students and Academic Faculty.","authors":"Kamis Gaballah, Kamran Ali, Daniel Zahra, Eteman Ibrahim","doi":"10.1155/ijod/9065801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Undergraduate dental education aims to equip students with scientific knowledge, clinical skills, and behavioral attributes to prepare them for a career in independent dental practice after graduation. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported preparedness of undergraduate dental students with evaluations by their clinical supervisors. <b>Methods:</b> A probability sampling technique was used to recruit final year dental students at a university in the Middle East. Preparedness of the students was assessed using a previously validated dental preparedness assessment scale encompassing 50 core clinical skills (Part A) as well as cognitive attributes and behavioral skills (Part B). The participating students were also evaluated by their clinical supervisors. <b>Results:</b> A total of 52 of the 70 students invited provided their responses, yielding a response rate of 74.28%. In addition, four clinical supervisors also evaluated the preparedness of the participants. The mean student ratings of their preparedness were significantly higher than ratings provided by their supervisors for Part A, <i>t</i> (93.13) = 7.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001; Part B, <i>t</i> (101.46) = 7.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001; and overall, <i>t</i> (98.48) = 8.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001. <b>Discussion:</b> This study compared students' self-perceived preparedness for dental practice with evaluations by their supervisors. The students rated their preparedness to be higher compared to the evaluations by their supervisors, indicating weak correlations between self-perceived preparedness and supervisors' evaluation. Nevertheless, evaluation by supervisors provides a powerful tool for students to compare their self-assessment and reflect on their strengths and weaknesses for work readiness after graduation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9065801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/9065801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Undergraduate dental education aims to equip students with scientific knowledge, clinical skills, and behavioral attributes to prepare them for a career in independent dental practice after graduation. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported preparedness of undergraduate dental students with evaluations by their clinical supervisors. Methods: A probability sampling technique was used to recruit final year dental students at a university in the Middle East. Preparedness of the students was assessed using a previously validated dental preparedness assessment scale encompassing 50 core clinical skills (Part A) as well as cognitive attributes and behavioral skills (Part B). The participating students were also evaluated by their clinical supervisors. Results: A total of 52 of the 70 students invited provided their responses, yielding a response rate of 74.28%. In addition, four clinical supervisors also evaluated the preparedness of the participants. The mean student ratings of their preparedness were significantly higher than ratings provided by their supervisors for Part A, t (93.13) = 7.48, p < 0.001; Part B, t (101.46) = 7.25, p < 0.001; and overall, t (98.48) = 8.25, p < 0.001. Discussion: This study compared students' self-perceived preparedness for dental practice with evaluations by their supervisors. The students rated their preparedness to be higher compared to the evaluations by their supervisors, indicating weak correlations between self-perceived preparedness and supervisors' evaluation. Nevertheless, evaluation by supervisors provides a powerful tool for students to compare their self-assessment and reflect on their strengths and weaknesses for work readiness after graduation.

牙科本科生临床实习准备:学生评价与教师评价的比较。
本科牙科教育的目的是使学生具备科学知识、临床技能和行为属性,为毕业后独立从事牙科工作做好准备。本研究的目的是比较自我报告的准备本科牙科学生与他们的临床导师的评估。方法:采用概率抽样的方法,对中东某大学牙科专业的高三学生进行调查。使用先前验证的牙科准备评估量表评估学生的准备情况,包括50项核心临床技能(a部分)以及认知属性和行为技能(B部分)。参与的学生也由他们的临床导师进行评估。结果:被邀请的70名学生中,有52人提供了回复,回复率为74.28%。此外,四名临床监督员还对参与者的准备情况进行了评估。学生对备考准备的平均评分显著高于导师对A部分的评分,t (93.13) = 7.48, p < 0.001;B部分,t (101.46) = 7.25, p < 0.001;总体而言,t (98.48) = 8.25, p < 0.001。讨论:本研究比较学生对牙科诊所的自我知觉准备与导师的评估。学生对自己准备程度的评价高于导师对自己准备程度的评价,表明自我感知准备程度与导师评价之间的相关性较弱。然而,导师的评估为学生提供了一个强有力的工具,可以比较他们的自我评估,反思他们毕业后工作准备的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信