Psychosocial work determinants of older adults' participation in the job market: protocol for a scoping review of quantitative longitudinal studies.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ruth Ndjaboue, Stella Ruddy, Fadila Bulver, Joel Diendere, Mélanie Levasseur, Micaelle Nguefack, Heidi Noël, Abigail Djossou
{"title":"Psychosocial work determinants of older adults' participation in the job market: protocol for a scoping review of quantitative longitudinal studies.","authors":"Ruth Ndjaboue, Stella Ruddy, Fadila Bulver, Joel Diendere, Mélanie Levasseur, Micaelle Nguefack, Heidi Noël, Abigail Djossou","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02809-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than one-third of the population in developed countries is aged 50 and older (hereafter older adults), and this proportion has been increasing every year. Aging is associated with labor shortages which places a large socioeconomic stress on individuals, organizations, and governments. Evidence on the influences of psychosocial factors in older workers mostly focuses on adverse health outcomes and early retirement, with little or no evidence of their influences on other aspects or assessments of older adults' participation in the job market. In this work, we aim to describe existing quantitative longitudinal studies on the relationship between psychosocial work factors and older adult's participation in the job market, and to explore how the outcome is operationalized in existing studies on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review frameworks developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Levac and colleagues will guide this study. We will perform a comprehensive search for eligible publications in the followingdatabases: MEDLINE, AgeLine, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, ProQuest One Business, SOCindex, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, and Social Works Abstract. This work will focus on the job-demand-control-support, the effort-reward imbalance, the organizational justice, three renowned theretical models, while paying attention to other work risk factors measured in selected studies. Studies involving older adults of 50 years old or more and published in English or French will be considered, regardless of publication date. Abstracts, full-text screening, and data extraction will be performed independently by two trained reviewers using standard methodology. While sorting studies, we will complete a narrative synthesis of findings considering, when possible, sex and gender.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While rigorous reviews are increasingly being recommended for decision-making in organizational and political guidelines, providing an overview of psychosocial work factors associated with older adult's participation in the job market is a crucial start point. This scoping review will contribute to the understanding of how to define and assess participation in the job market and its work-related determinants in older adults. Our findings may also help to prioritize if and what future systematic reviews on this topic should focus on.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Submitted in Open Science Framework on 07-10-2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02809-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than one-third of the population in developed countries is aged 50 and older (hereafter older adults), and this proportion has been increasing every year. Aging is associated with labor shortages which places a large socioeconomic stress on individuals, organizations, and governments. Evidence on the influences of psychosocial factors in older workers mostly focuses on adverse health outcomes and early retirement, with little or no evidence of their influences on other aspects or assessments of older adults' participation in the job market. In this work, we aim to describe existing quantitative longitudinal studies on the relationship between psychosocial work factors and older adult's participation in the job market, and to explore how the outcome is operationalized in existing studies on this topic.

Methods: The scoping review frameworks developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Levac and colleagues will guide this study. We will perform a comprehensive search for eligible publications in the followingdatabases: MEDLINE, AgeLine, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, ProQuest One Business, SOCindex, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, and Social Works Abstract. This work will focus on the job-demand-control-support, the effort-reward imbalance, the organizational justice, three renowned theretical models, while paying attention to other work risk factors measured in selected studies. Studies involving older adults of 50 years old or more and published in English or French will be considered, regardless of publication date. Abstracts, full-text screening, and data extraction will be performed independently by two trained reviewers using standard methodology. While sorting studies, we will complete a narrative synthesis of findings considering, when possible, sex and gender.

Discussion: While rigorous reviews are increasingly being recommended for decision-making in organizational and political guidelines, providing an overview of psychosocial work factors associated with older adult's participation in the job market is a crucial start point. This scoping review will contribute to the understanding of how to define and assess participation in the job market and its work-related determinants in older adults. Our findings may also help to prioritize if and what future systematic reviews on this topic should focus on.

Systematic review registration: Submitted in Open Science Framework on 07-10-2023.

老年人参与就业市场的社会心理工作决定因素:定量纵向研究的范围审查方案。
背景:在发达国家,超过三分之一的人口年龄在50岁及以上(以下简称老年人),并且这一比例每年都在增加。老龄化与劳动力短缺有关,这给个人、组织和政府带来了巨大的社会经济压力。关于心理社会因素对老年工人的影响的证据主要集中在不利的健康结果和提前退休方面,很少或根本没有证据表明它们对其他方面或对老年人参与就业市场的评估有影响。在这项工作中,我们旨在描述现有的关于社会心理工作因素与老年人参与就业市场之间关系的定量纵向研究,并探讨如何在现有的研究中操作这一主题的结果。方法:乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)和Levac及其同事开发的范围审查框架将指导本研究。我们将在以下数据库中对符合条件的出版物进行全面搜索:MEDLINE, AgeLine, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, ProQuest One Business, SOCindex, Abstracts in Social Gerontology和Social Works Abstract。本文将重点关注工作需求-控制-支持、努力-回报不平衡、组织公平这三个著名的理论模型,同时关注其他研究中测量到的工作风险因素。涉及50岁或以上的老年人,且以英语或法语发表的研究将被考虑,无论发表日期如何。摘要、全文筛选和数据提取将由两名训练有素的审稿人使用标准方法独立完成。在分类研究的同时,我们将在可能的情况下完成对研究结果的叙述性综合,考虑到性别和社会性别。讨论:虽然越来越多的人建议在组织和政治指导方针的决策中进行严格的审查,但提供与老年人参与就业市场相关的心理社会工作因素的概述是一个至关重要的起点。这一范围审查将有助于理解如何定义和评估老年人参与就业市场及其与工作相关的决定因素。我们的发现也可能有助于优先考虑是否以及未来关于该主题的系统评价应该关注什么。系统综述注册:于07-10-2023在Open Science Framework提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信