Triple Versus Double Antibiotic Therapy in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendicectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Case-Control Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kai-Zheong Lim, Ramesh M Nataraja, Maurizio Pacilli
{"title":"Triple Versus Double Antibiotic Therapy in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendicectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Kai-Zheong Lim, Ramesh M Nataraja, Maurizio Pacilli","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> Historically, a triple-antibiotic (TA) regimen (ampicillin, gentamicin, metronidazole) has been used for children with complicated appendicitis (CA) at our institution. We implemented a double-antibiotic (DA) regimen (ceftriaxone, metronidazole) in November 2018. The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative outcomes between the two groups. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical records of children who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) for CA between November 2017 and 2019. Data, reported as number of cases (%) and median with interquartile range or 95% confidence interval (CI), were analyzed with Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test; p values <0.05 were considered significant. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred and ninety-seven patients were identified; 99 treated with the TA regimen and 98 with the DA regimen. The groups had similar demographics. Post-operative complications were similar between the two groups: intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) 12 (12.1%) in TA versus 10 (10.2%) in DA (p = 0.82); surgical site infections 1 (1.0%) in TA versus 2 (2.2%) in DA (p = 0.62). Time to defervescence in the first 5 post-operative days was substantially longer in the TA group: 72 (95% CI 72-96) versus 48 (95% CI 48-72) hours (p = 0.003). Among patients without post-operative IAA, the DA group had a shorter post-operative hospital stay (5 [5-6] vs. 5.5 [5-6] days; p = 0.04). The cost of DA regimen was substantially lower (p < 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The DA regimen provided better post-operative temperature control and a quicker overall recovery, without increasing the incidence of IAA and surgical site infection in children following LA for CA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Historically, a triple-antibiotic (TA) regimen (ampicillin, gentamicin, metronidazole) has been used for children with complicated appendicitis (CA) at our institution. We implemented a double-antibiotic (DA) regimen (ceftriaxone, metronidazole) in November 2018. The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative outcomes between the two groups. Patients and Methods: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical records of children who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) for CA between November 2017 and 2019. Data, reported as number of cases (%) and median with interquartile range or 95% confidence interval (CI), were analyzed with Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test; p values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were identified; 99 treated with the TA regimen and 98 with the DA regimen. The groups had similar demographics. Post-operative complications were similar between the two groups: intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) 12 (12.1%) in TA versus 10 (10.2%) in DA (p = 0.82); surgical site infections 1 (1.0%) in TA versus 2 (2.2%) in DA (p = 0.62). Time to defervescence in the first 5 post-operative days was substantially longer in the TA group: 72 (95% CI 72-96) versus 48 (95% CI 48-72) hours (p = 0.003). Among patients without post-operative IAA, the DA group had a shorter post-operative hospital stay (5 [5-6] vs. 5.5 [5-6] days; p = 0.04). The cost of DA regimen was substantially lower (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The DA regimen provided better post-operative temperature control and a quicker overall recovery, without increasing the incidence of IAA and surgical site infection in children following LA for CA.

腹腔镜阑尾炎患儿行腹腔镜阑尾炎切除术的三联与双联抗生素治疗:病例-对照研究。
背景和目的:历史上,三抗生素(氨苄西林,庆大霉素,甲硝唑)方案已被用于儿童复杂阑尾炎(CA)在我们的机构。我们于2018年11月实施了双抗生素(头孢曲松、甲硝唑)方案。本研究的目的是比较两组的术后结果。患者和方法:从2017年11月至2019年11月接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗CA的儿童病历中收集临床和实验室数据。以病例数(%)和中位数(四分位数范围或95%置信区间(CI))报告的数据,采用Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行分析;结果:共发现197例患者;99例采用TA方案,98例采用DA方案。这两个群体的人口结构相似。两组术后并发症相似:TA组腹腔内脓肿12例(12.1%),DA组腹腔内脓肿10例(10.2%)(p = 0.82);TA组手术部位感染1例(1.0%),DA组2例(2.2%)(p = 0.62)。TA组术后5天至退热时间明显更长:72小时(95% CI 72-96) vs 48小时(95% CI 48-72) (p = 0.003)。在术后无IAA的患者中,DA组术后住院时间较短(5[5-6]天和5.5[5-6]天;P = 0.04)。DA方案的成本显著降低(p < 0.0001)。结论:DA方案提供了更好的术后温度控制和更快的整体恢复,没有增加LA治疗CA后儿童IAA和手术部位感染的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信