State-of-the-art review of blenderized diets-Status and future directions.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sharon Weston, Anushree Algotar, Sara Karjoo, Megan Gabel, Patrice Kruszewski, Debora Duro, Senthilkumar Sankararaman, Danielle Wendel, Shweta S Namjoshi, Ruba A Abdelhadi, David Kawatu, Mark R Corkins, Timothy Sentongo
{"title":"State-of-the-art review of blenderized diets-Status and future directions.","authors":"Sharon Weston, Anushree Algotar, Sara Karjoo, Megan Gabel, Patrice Kruszewski, Debora Duro, Senthilkumar Sankararaman, Danielle Wendel, Shweta S Namjoshi, Ruba A Abdelhadi, David Kawatu, Mark R Corkins, Timothy Sentongo","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This state-of-the-art review was produced by a multidisciplinary team composed of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition healthcare providers to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of blenderized tube feeds (BTFs). The team developed 12 vital questions to address gaps in the current understanding and practice of using BTFs, then performed a comprehensive search of literature published between 2000 and 2023 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase databases, and an individual search of references. There was a scarcity of well-designed randomized clinical trials, and most of the studies were prospective or retrospective observational reports from heterogeneous patient demographics, varieties of BTFs, and medical conditions. Use of BTFs was associated with improved outcomes, including higher satisfaction, reduced gastroesophageal reflux, retching, gagging, constipation, frequency of hospitalization for respiratory disease, and greater diversity of the gut microbiome. However, homemade and commercially manufactured BTFs varied in nutrient composition and physical properties, such as viscosity, which posed challenges related to ease of administration and comparison of clinical outcomes. Therefore, whereas the use of BTFs as an alternative to standard commercial formulas has become increasingly popular, further evidence is warranted to provide guidelines on best practices for usage, monitoring, and comparing clinical outcomes. Pediatric dietitians and clinician practitioners must regularly monitor children receiving BTFs to ensure nutritional adequacy, optimize safe and effective delivery, and promote optimal growth. The team proposed future directions regarding best practices for using BTFs, primarily related to clinical application and nutritional outcomes in children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This state-of-the-art review was produced by a multidisciplinary team composed of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition healthcare providers to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of blenderized tube feeds (BTFs). The team developed 12 vital questions to address gaps in the current understanding and practice of using BTFs, then performed a comprehensive search of literature published between 2000 and 2023 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase databases, and an individual search of references. There was a scarcity of well-designed randomized clinical trials, and most of the studies were prospective or retrospective observational reports from heterogeneous patient demographics, varieties of BTFs, and medical conditions. Use of BTFs was associated with improved outcomes, including higher satisfaction, reduced gastroesophageal reflux, retching, gagging, constipation, frequency of hospitalization for respiratory disease, and greater diversity of the gut microbiome. However, homemade and commercially manufactured BTFs varied in nutrient composition and physical properties, such as viscosity, which posed challenges related to ease of administration and comparison of clinical outcomes. Therefore, whereas the use of BTFs as an alternative to standard commercial formulas has become increasingly popular, further evidence is warranted to provide guidelines on best practices for usage, monitoring, and comparing clinical outcomes. Pediatric dietitians and clinician practitioners must regularly monitor children receiving BTFs to ensure nutritional adequacy, optimize safe and effective delivery, and promote optimal growth. The team proposed future directions regarding best practices for using BTFs, primarily related to clinical application and nutritional outcomes in children and adolescents.

混合饮食的最新进展-现状和未来方向。
这项最新的综述是由一个由儿科胃肠病学和营养保健提供者组成的多学科团队制作的,旨在提供混合管饲(btf)使用的全面概述。该团队提出了12个关键问题,以解决目前对btf的理解和实践中的差距,然后使用PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase数据库对2000年至2023年间发表的文献进行了全面搜索,并对参考文献进行了单独搜索。缺乏设计良好的随机临床试验,大多数研究是前瞻性或回顾性观察性报告,来自不同的患者人口统计数据、不同的btf和医疗条件。使用btf与改善的结果相关,包括更高的满意度,减少胃食管反流,干呕,呕吐,便秘,呼吸系统疾病住院的频率,以及肠道微生物组的更大多样性。然而,自制和商业生产的btf在营养成分和物理性质(如粘度)方面各不相同,这给给药的便利性和临床结果的比较带来了挑战。因此,尽管使用btf作为标准商业配方的替代品越来越受欢迎,但需要进一步的证据来提供关于使用、监测和比较临床结果的最佳实践指南。儿科营养师和临床医生必须定期监测接受btf的儿童,以确保营养充足,优化安全有效的分娩,促进最佳生长。该团队提出了关于使用btf的最佳实践的未来方向,主要与儿童和青少年的临床应用和营养结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信