Neurostimulant Use for Rehabilitation and Recovery After Stroke: A Narrative Literature Review.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048677
Helene Chesnais, Kelly L Sloane, Jens Witsch, Christopher Favilla, Scott E Kasner, Aaron Rothstein
{"title":"Neurostimulant Use for Rehabilitation and Recovery After Stroke: A Narrative Literature Review.","authors":"Helene Chesnais, Kelly L Sloane, Jens Witsch, Christopher Favilla, Scott E Kasner, Aaron Rothstein","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke often results in significant impairments across various domains, including movement, language, cognition, and mood. Neurostimulants have been proposed as potential therapeutic interventions to enhance recovery in these areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative literature review examines clinical trials investigating the efficacy of neurostimulants in poststroke recovery. It evaluates outcomes related to aphasia, motor deficits, cognition, fatigue, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis included 34 trials testing the following neurostimulants: methylphenidate (n=6), amphetamines (n=8), memantine (n=2), modafinil (n=2), levodopa (n=14), amantadine (n=1), bromocriptine (n=3), and ropinirole (n=1). Of the 34 studies, 31 were randomized, placebo-controlled (double-blind, n=27; single-blind, n=2; unblinded n=2), 2 were randomized and not placebo-controlled, and 1 was not randomized. Study design was either multiarm (n=23), crossover (n=10), or used subjects as their own control (n=1). Mean sample size was 49.4 (5-593).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests that memantine may be effective for aphasia, although few phase III trials exist, whereas bromocriptine and amphetamines lack sufficient evidence for long-term recovery of aphasia. Levodopa may improve motor aphasias but has not shown long-term benefits for motor recovery. Similarly, ropinirole has not been shown to improve poststroke motor outcomes. Methylphenidate has limited efficacy for cognitive improvement but may enhance poststroke functionality and mood. Modafinil may help with poststroke fatigue. In conclusion, there are promising results of positive effects of neurostimulants with few side effects, though studies are limited by heterogeneous designs and small sample sizes. Neurostimulant efficacy must be assessed in conjunction with specific rehabilitation modalities as part of larger, well-designed studies to best understand their effects on impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"1853-1871"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke often results in significant impairments across various domains, including movement, language, cognition, and mood. Neurostimulants have been proposed as potential therapeutic interventions to enhance recovery in these areas.

Methods: This narrative literature review examines clinical trials investigating the efficacy of neurostimulants in poststroke recovery. It evaluates outcomes related to aphasia, motor deficits, cognition, fatigue, and depression.

Results: The qualitative analysis included 34 trials testing the following neurostimulants: methylphenidate (n=6), amphetamines (n=8), memantine (n=2), modafinil (n=2), levodopa (n=14), amantadine (n=1), bromocriptine (n=3), and ropinirole (n=1). Of the 34 studies, 31 were randomized, placebo-controlled (double-blind, n=27; single-blind, n=2; unblinded n=2), 2 were randomized and not placebo-controlled, and 1 was not randomized. Study design was either multiarm (n=23), crossover (n=10), or used subjects as their own control (n=1). Mean sample size was 49.4 (5-593).

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that memantine may be effective for aphasia, although few phase III trials exist, whereas bromocriptine and amphetamines lack sufficient evidence for long-term recovery of aphasia. Levodopa may improve motor aphasias but has not shown long-term benefits for motor recovery. Similarly, ropinirole has not been shown to improve poststroke motor outcomes. Methylphenidate has limited efficacy for cognitive improvement but may enhance poststroke functionality and mood. Modafinil may help with poststroke fatigue. In conclusion, there are promising results of positive effects of neurostimulants with few side effects, though studies are limited by heterogeneous designs and small sample sizes. Neurostimulant efficacy must be assessed in conjunction with specific rehabilitation modalities as part of larger, well-designed studies to best understand their effects on impairment.

神经兴奋剂用于中风后的康复和恢复:叙述性文献综述。
背景:中风通常会导致不同领域的显著损伤,包括运动、语言、认知和情绪。神经兴奋剂已被提出作为潜在的治疗干预措施,以提高这些领域的恢复。方法:本文回顾了研究神经兴奋剂在脑卒中后康复疗效的临床试验。它评估与失语、运动缺陷、认知、疲劳和抑郁相关的结果。结果:定性分析包括34项试验:哌甲酯(n=6)、安非他明(n=8)、美金刚(n=2)、莫达非尼(n=2)、左旋多巴(n=14)、亚胺胺(n=1)、溴隐亭(n=3)、罗匹尼罗(n=1)。34项研究中,31项为随机、安慰剂对照(双盲,n=27;单盲,n = 2;非盲法n=2), 2例随机化且非安慰剂对照,1例非随机化。研究设计为多组(n=23)、交叉(n=10)或使用受试者作为自己的对照(n=1)。平均样本量为49.4(5-593)。结论:目前的证据表明,美金刚可能对失语症有效,尽管很少有III期试验存在,而溴隐亭和安非他明缺乏足够的证据证明失语症的长期恢复。左旋多巴可以改善运动失语症,但对运动恢复没有长期的益处。同样,罗匹尼罗也未被证明能改善脑卒中后的运动预后。哌醋甲酯对认知改善的作用有限,但可能增强中风后的功能和情绪。莫达非尼可能有助于中风后的疲劳。综上所述,尽管研究受到异质设计和小样本量的限制,但神经兴奋剂的积极作用和副作用很少,这是有希望的结果。神经刺激剂的疗效必须与特定的康复方式一起评估,作为更大的、设计良好的研究的一部分,以最好地了解它们对损伤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信