Shengfei Hu, Ziyu Liao, Rui Wang, Milan Zhang, Qiuming Zeng, Zhihua Zhao, Xi Wang, Hongyu Zhou, Wei Li, Yaxin Lu, Huan Yang, Wei Qiu, Rui Li
{"title":"Relapse risk after rituximab discontinuation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shengfei Hu, Ziyu Liao, Rui Wang, Milan Zhang, Qiuming Zeng, Zhihua Zhao, Xi Wang, Hongyu Zhou, Wei Li, Yaxin Lu, Huan Yang, Wei Qiu, Rui Li","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13125-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the association between rituximab (RTX) treatment duration and relapse risk, and explore clinical outcomes following treatment discontinuation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from rituximab-treated patients (>1-year follow-up after treatment initiation) with NMOSD at five major clinical centers in China between 2016 and 2023. The main outcome measures were changes in relapse risk based on the RTX treatment duration and clinical outcomes following relapse after RTX discontinuation. The Andersen-Gill model was used to analyze treatment duration-relapse risk associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 106 rituximab-treated patients were included (40 patients discontinued and 66 continued RTX). Longer RTX treatment significantly reduced relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.43, P < 0.001). Among 28 patients who discontinued RTX and were followed-up for >1 year after drug withdrawal, 53.6% (15/28) relapsed at a median interval of 14 months. Patients with >2 years of RTX treatment exhibited lower annual relapse rate (ARR) (mean ARR: 0.97 vs. 0.28, P = 0.020) and less severe relapses (mean ΔEDSS score: 1.42 vs. 0.50, P = 0.021) after discontinuation, compared to pre-treatment levels. Only one of four (25%) longer-treated and clinically stable patients (≥2 years of RTX treatment and no relapses ≥2 years before discontinuation) experienced a non-severe relapse by 50 months. Patients aged >55 years in the discontinuation group had the lowest post-discontinuation relapse rate.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>RTX treatment duration strongly correlated with reduced relapse risk in NMOSD patients. Relapse risk after RTX discontinuation was lower than that after discontinuing traditional oral immunosuppressants, particularly in patients with longer treatment and clinical stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 6","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13125-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the association between rituximab (RTX) treatment duration and relapse risk, and explore clinical outcomes following treatment discontinuation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).
Methods: We retrospectively collected data from rituximab-treated patients (>1-year follow-up after treatment initiation) with NMOSD at five major clinical centers in China between 2016 and 2023. The main outcome measures were changes in relapse risk based on the RTX treatment duration and clinical outcomes following relapse after RTX discontinuation. The Andersen-Gill model was used to analyze treatment duration-relapse risk associations.
Results: In total, 106 rituximab-treated patients were included (40 patients discontinued and 66 continued RTX). Longer RTX treatment significantly reduced relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.43, P < 0.001). Among 28 patients who discontinued RTX and were followed-up for >1 year after drug withdrawal, 53.6% (15/28) relapsed at a median interval of 14 months. Patients with >2 years of RTX treatment exhibited lower annual relapse rate (ARR) (mean ARR: 0.97 vs. 0.28, P = 0.020) and less severe relapses (mean ΔEDSS score: 1.42 vs. 0.50, P = 0.021) after discontinuation, compared to pre-treatment levels. Only one of four (25%) longer-treated and clinically stable patients (≥2 years of RTX treatment and no relapses ≥2 years before discontinuation) experienced a non-severe relapse by 50 months. Patients aged >55 years in the discontinuation group had the lowest post-discontinuation relapse rate.
Interpretation: RTX treatment duration strongly correlated with reduced relapse risk in NMOSD patients. Relapse risk after RTX discontinuation was lower than that after discontinuing traditional oral immunosuppressants, particularly in patients with longer treatment and clinical stability.
目的:我们旨在评估利妥昔单抗(RTX)治疗时间与复发风险之间的关系,并探讨停止治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)后的临床结果。方法:我们回顾性收集2016年至2023年在中国5个主要临床中心接受利妥昔单抗治疗的NMOSD患者(治疗开始后随访1年)的数据。主要结局指标是基于RTX治疗持续时间和RTX停药后复发的临床结果的复发风险变化。采用Andersen-Gill模型分析治疗持续时间与复发风险之间的关联。结果:共纳入106例接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者(40例停止治疗,66例继续接受RTX治疗)。较长时间RTX治疗显著降低复发风险(风险比[HR]=0.43, P停药后1年,53.6%(15/28)患者在中位间隔14个月复发。与治疗前相比,接受RTX治疗bbbb2年的患者停药后的年复发率(ARR)较低(平均ARR: 0.97 vs. 0.28, P = 0.020),复发程度较轻(平均ΔEDSS评分:1.42 vs. 0.50, P = 0.021)。只有四分之一(25%)的长期治疗和临床稳定的患者(RTX治疗≥2年,停药前≥2年无复发)在50个月时出现非严重复发。停药组0 ~ 55岁患者停药后复发率最低。解释:RTX治疗时间与NMOSD患者复发风险降低密切相关。RTX停药后的复发风险低于传统口服免疫抑制剂停药后的复发风险,尤其是治疗时间较长且临床稳定的患者。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.