The association between proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulants users.

npj Cardiovascular Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3
Zixuan Wang, Qiuyan Yu, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Ka Shing Cheung, Celine S L Chui, Esther W Chan, Ian C K Wong, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas, Angel Y S Wong
{"title":"The association between proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulants users.","authors":"Zixuan Wang, Qiuyan Yu, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Ka Shing Cheung, Celine S L Chui, Esther W Chan, Ian C K Wong, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas, Angel Y S Wong","doi":"10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current evidence of whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is limited. Propensity score-weighted cohort and case-crossover studies were conducted separately in England and Hong Kong between 2011.01.01 and 2019.12.31. In the cohort design, we compared the hazards of hospitalised GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> users in people with atrial fibrillation and found higher hazard of GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users in both settings. In the case-crossover design, elevated odds of exposure to <b><i>PPI only</i></b> , <b><i>OAC only</i></b> and <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB between 30-day hazard and referent periods were similarly found in both settings. Overall, the evidence of an elevated risk of <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB compared with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> was modest in the cohort study. Our case-crossover study suggested that residual confounding is likely to explain the association, suggesting that concomitant prescription of PPI with OAC did not modify GIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":501706,"journal":{"name":"npj Cardiovascular Health","volume":"2 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Cardiovascular Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current evidence of whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is limited. Propensity score-weighted cohort and case-crossover studies were conducted separately in England and Hong Kong between 2011.01.01 and 2019.12.31. In the cohort design, we compared the hazards of hospitalised GIB in OAC  +  PPI users with OAC only users in people with atrial fibrillation and found higher hazard of GIB in OAC  +  PPI users in both settings. In the case-crossover design, elevated odds of exposure to PPI only , OAC only and OAC  +  PPI associated with GIB between 30-day hazard and referent periods were similarly found in both settings. Overall, the evidence of an elevated risk of OAC  +  PPI associated with GIB compared with OAC only was modest in the cohort study. Our case-crossover study suggested that residual confounding is likely to explain the association, suggesting that concomitant prescription of PPI with OAC did not modify GIB.

质子泵抑制剂与口服抗凝剂使用者胃肠道出血风险之间的关系。
目前关于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是否降低与口服抗凝剂(OACs)相关的胃肠道出血(GIB)风险的证据有限。倾向评分加权队列和病例交叉研究分别于2011.01.01至2019.12.31在英国和香港进行。在队列设计中,我们比较了房颤患者中OAC + PPI使用者与仅使用OAC的房颤患者住院GIB的风险,发现两种情况下OAC + PPI使用者的GIB风险更高。在病例交叉设计中,在这两种情况下,在30天的危险期和参考期内,仅暴露于PPI、仅暴露于OAC和OAC + PPI与GIB相关的几率也同样升高。总体而言,在队列研究中,与OAC相比,OAC + PPI与GIB相关的风险升高的证据并不明显。我们的病例交叉研究表明,残留的混杂因素可能解释了这种关联,表明PPI与OAC合用并没有改变GIB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信