Christina Oikonomopoulou, Anna Paisiou, Aikaterini Kaisari, Eleni-Dikaia Ioannidou, Anna Komitopoulou, Marina Letsiou, Ioannis Grafakos, Michalis Kastamoulas, Georgia Stavroulaki, Sofia Hante, Evgenios Goussetis
{"title":"Clinically Significant EBV Infection in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplanted Children Receiving Letermovir as Primary CMV Prophylaxis.","authors":"Christina Oikonomopoulou, Anna Paisiou, Aikaterini Kaisari, Eleni-Dikaia Ioannidou, Anna Komitopoulou, Marina Letsiou, Ioannis Grafakos, Michalis Kastamoulas, Georgia Stavroulaki, Sofia Hante, Evgenios Goussetis","doi":"10.1111/tid.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease constitute an important complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high morbidity. Letermovir prophylactic use in adult recipients has reduced the incidence of CMV infection with minimal toxicity. Relevant data on children is scarce, and letermovir has been used off-label. Recently, a couple of studies indicated an association of letermovir with EBV reactivation/PTLD in adults, raising a significant concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to retrospectively compare ultra-high-risk for CMV infection children with leukemia [seropositive children/seronegative donors], who received (LET-group) or did not receive (not LET-group) letermovir. Primary objectives were cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV reactivation, EBV reactivation, and clinically significant EBV infection (csEBVi).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 patients (median age 8.2 years), LET-group-11 and not LET-group-26, were included. The median follow-up was 34.3 months. Compared to the not LET group, patients of the LET group had a lower CI of CMV reactivation, 10% versus 38.4%, p = 0.07, a higher CI of EBV reactivation, 55%, referring to 6/11 patients, versus 23%, p = 0.07, and a higher CI of csEBVI, 40% (4/11 patients) versus 0%, p < 0.001. No patient in the LET group developed GvHD, compared to 23% for aGvHD p = 0.08 and 11.5% for cGvHD p = 0.25 in the non-LET group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms letermovir's effectiveness against CMV. Yet, it also reports a high incidence of EBV reactivation and significant EBV infection, as well as a reduced GvHD prevalence in children receiving the drug. Our single-center, retrospective analysis has major limitations but raises a concern. Our findings require further validation in larger, multicenter, prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease constitute an important complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high morbidity. Letermovir prophylactic use in adult recipients has reduced the incidence of CMV infection with minimal toxicity. Relevant data on children is scarce, and letermovir has been used off-label. Recently, a couple of studies indicated an association of letermovir with EBV reactivation/PTLD in adults, raising a significant concern.
Methods: We aimed to retrospectively compare ultra-high-risk for CMV infection children with leukemia [seropositive children/seronegative donors], who received (LET-group) or did not receive (not LET-group) letermovir. Primary objectives were cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV reactivation, EBV reactivation, and clinically significant EBV infection (csEBVi).
Results: A total of 37 patients (median age 8.2 years), LET-group-11 and not LET-group-26, were included. The median follow-up was 34.3 months. Compared to the not LET group, patients of the LET group had a lower CI of CMV reactivation, 10% versus 38.4%, p = 0.07, a higher CI of EBV reactivation, 55%, referring to 6/11 patients, versus 23%, p = 0.07, and a higher CI of csEBVI, 40% (4/11 patients) versus 0%, p < 0.001. No patient in the LET group developed GvHD, compared to 23% for aGvHD p = 0.08 and 11.5% for cGvHD p = 0.25 in the non-LET group.
Conclusion: Our study confirms letermovir's effectiveness against CMV. Yet, it also reports a high incidence of EBV reactivation and significant EBV infection, as well as a reduced GvHD prevalence in children receiving the drug. Our single-center, retrospective analysis has major limitations but raises a concern. Our findings require further validation in larger, multicenter, prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.