Clinically Significant EBV Infection in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplanted Children Receiving Letermovir as Primary CMV Prophylaxis.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Christina Oikonomopoulou, Anna Paisiou, Aikaterini Kaisari, Eleni-Dikaia Ioannidou, Anna Komitopoulou, Marina Letsiou, Ioannis Grafakos, Michalis Kastamoulas, Georgia Stavroulaki, Sofia Hante, Evgenios Goussetis
{"title":"Clinically Significant EBV Infection in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplanted Children Receiving Letermovir as Primary CMV Prophylaxis.","authors":"Christina Oikonomopoulou, Anna Paisiou, Aikaterini Kaisari, Eleni-Dikaia Ioannidou, Anna Komitopoulou, Marina Letsiou, Ioannis Grafakos, Michalis Kastamoulas, Georgia Stavroulaki, Sofia Hante, Evgenios Goussetis","doi":"10.1111/tid.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease constitute an important complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high morbidity. Letermovir prophylactic use in adult recipients has reduced the incidence of CMV infection with minimal toxicity. Relevant data on children is scarce, and letermovir has been used off-label. Recently, a couple of studies indicated an association of letermovir with EBV reactivation/PTLD in adults, raising a significant concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to retrospectively compare ultra-high-risk for CMV infection children with leukemia [seropositive children/seronegative donors], who received (LET-group) or did not receive (not LET-group) letermovir. Primary objectives were cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV reactivation, EBV reactivation, and clinically significant EBV infection (csEBVi).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 patients (median age 8.2 years), LET-group-11 and not LET-group-26, were included. The median follow-up was 34.3 months. Compared to the not LET group, patients of the LET group had a lower CI of CMV reactivation, 10% versus 38.4%, p = 0.07, a higher CI of EBV reactivation, 55%, referring to 6/11 patients, versus 23%, p = 0.07, and a higher CI of csEBVI, 40% (4/11 patients) versus 0%, p < 0.001. No patient in the LET group developed GvHD, compared to 23% for aGvHD p = 0.08 and 11.5% for cGvHD p = 0.25 in the non-LET group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms letermovir's effectiveness against CMV. Yet, it also reports a high incidence of EBV reactivation and significant EBV infection, as well as a reduced GvHD prevalence in children receiving the drug. Our single-center, retrospective analysis has major limitations but raises a concern. Our findings require further validation in larger, multicenter, prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease constitute an important complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high morbidity. Letermovir prophylactic use in adult recipients has reduced the incidence of CMV infection with minimal toxicity. Relevant data on children is scarce, and letermovir has been used off-label. Recently, a couple of studies indicated an association of letermovir with EBV reactivation/PTLD in adults, raising a significant concern.

Methods: We aimed to retrospectively compare ultra-high-risk for CMV infection children with leukemia [seropositive children/seronegative donors], who received (LET-group) or did not receive (not LET-group) letermovir. Primary objectives were cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV reactivation, EBV reactivation, and clinically significant EBV infection (csEBVi).

Results: A total of 37 patients (median age 8.2 years), LET-group-11 and not LET-group-26, were included. The median follow-up was 34.3 months. Compared to the not LET group, patients of the LET group had a lower CI of CMV reactivation, 10% versus 38.4%, p = 0.07, a higher CI of EBV reactivation, 55%, referring to 6/11 patients, versus 23%, p = 0.07, and a higher CI of csEBVI, 40% (4/11 patients) versus 0%, p < 0.001. No patient in the LET group developed GvHD, compared to 23% for aGvHD p = 0.08 and 11.5% for cGvHD p = 0.25 in the non-LET group.

Conclusion: Our study confirms letermovir's effectiveness against CMV. Yet, it also reports a high incidence of EBV reactivation and significant EBV infection, as well as a reduced GvHD prevalence in children receiving the drug. Our single-center, retrospective analysis has major limitations but raises a concern. Our findings require further validation in larger, multicenter, prospective studies.

同种异体干细胞移植儿童接受莱特莫韦预防巨细胞病毒的临床意义
背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染和疾病是异基因造血干细胞移植的重要并发症,发病率高。在成人受体中预防性使用莱特莫韦降低了巨细胞病毒感染的发生率,毒性最小。关于儿童的相关数据很少,而且letermovir已经在标签外使用。最近,几项研究表明,letermovir与成人EBV再激活/PTLD有关,引起了人们的重大关注。方法:我们旨在回顾性比较接受(let组)或未接受(非let组)利特莫韦治疗的白血病CMV感染超高风险儿童[血清阳性儿童/血清阴性供者]。主要目的是CMV再激活、EBV再激活的累积发生率(CI)和临床显著EBV感染(csEBVi)。结果:共纳入37例患者(中位年龄8.2岁),其中let组11例,非let组26例。中位随访时间为34.3个月。与非LET组相比,LET组患者CMV再激活的CI较低,分别为10%和38.4%,p = 0.07, EBV再激活的CI较高,分别为55%和23%,p = 0.07, csEBVI的CI较高,分别为40%和0%,p结论:我们的研究证实了letermovir对CMV的有效性。然而,它也报告了EBV再激活和显著EBV感染的高发生率,以及接受该药物的儿童GvHD患病率降低。我们的单中心回顾性分析有很大的局限性,但也引起了关注。我们的发现需要在更大的、多中心的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信